The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 June 2016, 11:38 PM   #31
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
Come on chaps...have pity. The Cellini range is genuinely well-priced for an 18kt gold watch with a great movement. It's got decent waterproofing and the superb 3135 movement, with high shock resistance. And Rolex serviceability.
Be kind, it's a fine watch but just not fashionable.
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2016, 11:51 PM   #32
belligero
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: EUR
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robrob777 View Post
Just look at them

image credit: Rolex


I've certainly seen worse when it comes to dressier watches.
belligero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 12:03 AM   #33
Headshrinker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 4,056
I am going to guess that most members see Rolex as more of a sports watch. The Cellini line is much more formal, that notion is becoming less and less in important in today's world. Even going to church or or a funeral is no longer a suit and tie event. I, myself, see it as sad.
Headshrinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 12:54 AM   #34
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,350
I think the Cellini Time looks great in WG. I saw my AD manager wearing the black dialed one.

As others have mentioned, there is a lot of competition out there for a dress watch in PM with a leather strap. I think it would be a nice purchase if you can find one in good condition for under $10K USD.
Attached Images
 
jon_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 01:06 PM   #35
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by belligero View Post

image credit: Rolex


I've certainly seen worse when it comes to dressier watches.
Isn't that a vintage model?
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 01:15 PM   #36
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Isn't that a vintage model?
Yes, I have the current (deceased a few months ago) model. It's sad because thus ended a Rolex line stretching back to 1928. And probably the last ever manual wind. It also had an open back. All very 'unrolex'. The latest Cellini's are far more conventional.
I like them, perhaps because so few people give them a second thought. Unloved little brother in the hulking great Rolex family.
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 01:32 PM   #37
osamu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
I remember when I was first shopping for a Rolex, I was drawn to a few Cellini models. At the time I didn't know the first thing about Rolex, and was looking for a wedding present, so I thought a dressier watch would be more suitable. Two ADs I went to (one in Japan, one here) both steered me away from the Cellini line, and suggested I choose something from their case with just the oyster case models.

I recall when looking in Japan, they had a Prince for around like 12k USD? That was a bit out of my budget at the time, and with the AD not suggesting it, I didn't go for it. I still think that sounds like a good price for a gold watch. Sometimes I see Cellini Prince's on the used market for 7-9k. I hope I can pick one up someday.
osamu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 03:52 PM   #38
Eric Chan
"TRF" Member
 
Eric Chan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterskinner View Post
Come on chaps...have pity. The Cellini range is genuinely well-priced for an 18kt gold watch with a great movement. It's got decent waterproofing and the superb 3135 movement, with high shock resistance. And Rolex serviceability.
Be kind, it's a fine watch but just not fashionable.
Personally, I think they are beautiful timepieces. And would proudly wear one if I were on the market for a dress watch. As I get older, I feel the need to acquire at least one dress watch and if that is the case, why not a Cellini. For the price, you get a lot of watch.

Attached a picture of my favourite model for the new Cellini line. It was released during this year's Basel. The black dial version with black leather strap is pretty sharp too.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Eric Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 03:54 PM   #39
Eric Chan
"TRF" Member
 
Eric Chan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headshrinker View Post
I am going to guess that most members see Rolex as more of a sports watch. The Cellini line is much more formal, that notion is becoming less and less in important in today's world. Even going to church or or a funeral is no longer a suit and tie event. I, myself, see it as sad.
In total agreement with you my friend. There are some traditions that should not be forgotten. Very sad indeed.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Eric Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 05:57 PM   #40
belligero
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: EUR
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Isn't that a vintage model?
Yes, it's the predecessor to the more recent models:




image credit: hodinkee

Personally, I'd consider the Cellini range just because there would be less stress associated with them than their conglomerate-owned equivalents. (I got rid a nice Reverso a few years ago in large part because I didn't want to deal with Richemont at service time.)

They're well-finished watches with high-quality, well-thought-out movements. Probably worth a look for someone who wants something at the dressier end of the range.
belligero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 06:50 PM   #41
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
Yes, the whole service issue influences my selection quite a lot. I believe you will get easier, quicker, service from an RSC than Richement...in fact I know so from personal experience.
That's why a Rolex dress watch makes sense to me. I like to look ahead.
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 06:54 PM   #42
Cimballi
"TRF" Member
 
Cimballi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: N. California
Watch: Love them all
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
This question comes up quite often here. The general consensus usually seems to be that other brands make more attractive dress watches at a similar price.
Yes. "Attractive" as in "better".
__________________
Submariner, Datejust, Aqua Terra, Speedmaster, Chronomat, Pathfinder, Nettuno, vintage Girard Perregaud, vintage Rogers, vintage Election, etc...
Cimballi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 07:03 PM   #43
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
This question comes up quite often here. The general consensus usually seems to be that other brands make more attractive dress watches at a similar price.
This is the case for me.
AP
Patek
IWC
JLC
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 07:12 PM   #44
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
It's my impression that the majority of Rolex's advertising over the years has been directed at building the image that their watches are sporty and rugged (the stars which endorse the brand are mainly from the worlds of tennis, golf, sailing and polo).

Somehow, Cellini doesn't fit that image so that could explain the brand's relative unpopularity.
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 08:01 PM   #45
Ouro9999
"TRF" Member
 
Ouro9999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Romero
Location: Brasil
Watch: SUB16610lv
Posts: 587
For me there is a very strange thing: the name! Yes the problem with this line of watches is the name.

Cellini sounds a lot like a womans watch, Rolex should keep Cellini for Womans, and get i new name for the mens collection of dress watches.

This will fix the issue.
Ouro9999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 08:48 PM   #46
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
Not a Cellini hater here, but I think the new Cellini is thick for a time only dress watch. I have a PP Calatrava 5022G and it's about 50% thinner than a Cellini. I like how the PP sits flat and fits easily under any sleeve
Star Ferry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 10:41 PM   #47
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
There will always be a limited market for 'Dress watches' compared to other types.
There have been some lovely models in the Cellini range over the years and many look just fine in a work environment. They are great value second-hand.
The Prince models are distinctive and really stand out.
The new Cellini range is just outstanding and could be worn daily by any professional without looking out of place. The problem for me is that I couldn't pick just one that I like best.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 10:44 PM   #48
DaveDhc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ouro9999 View Post
... Cellini sounds a lot like a womans watch, ...
Submariner, Oyster Perpetual, Daytona, GMT ... they all sound like a women's watches. I guess Rolex has a lot to fix so that we can feel more like men when we put our watches on. Since I have a rose gold Daytona, I have real issues besides the name.
DaveDhc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2016, 11:09 PM   #49
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveDhc View Post
Submariner, Oyster Perpetual, Daytona, GMT ... they all sound like a women's watches. I guess Rolex has a lot to fix so that we can feel more like men when we put our watches on. Since I have a rose gold Daytona, I have real issues besides the name.
What we need is a range of gentleman's watches called something like: 'Bloke.'
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2016, 02:21 AM   #50
bjavor
"TRF" Member
 
bjavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Geneva
Posts: 56
I used to like them. Even though I'm normally not a fan of Roman numerals (too blocky most of the time) the thin, sublime numbers on the previous generation Cellinis really appealed to me. But this year they've removed them for some reason :(

Last edited by bjavor; 8 June 2016 at 02:22 AM.. Reason: Typo
bjavor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2016, 07:11 AM   #51
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Demand. Having more or less invented the sports watch genre Rolex does what it does best in the sports lineup. Purposeful, waterproof bulletproof watches are what the brand is famous for. These traits aren't particularly needed in a dress watch. Though a nice Day Date is the best of both worlds. Generally speaking when people want a purely dress watch the go to brands are JLC, Patek, Vacheron, Lange etc. All of which do dress watches better. No question.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2016, 04:40 PM   #52
Lee66
"TRF" Member
 
Lee66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 88
The Cellini can't compete with the Holy Trinity - Vacheron, Audemars and Patek at that price point. These three are seen as superior to Rolex in the same way a Rolls Royce or Bentley are superior to a Mercedes.

Rolex is famous for the DJ and sports models - the oyster case and ruggedness. It was never in the running to take the top spot for dress watches.
__________________
16710 GMT Master II (Coke)
116610LN Sub-C
116710 BLNR Batman
Lee66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2017, 01:05 AM   #53
McFly
"TRF" Member
 
McFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Marty
Location: Hill Valley, Cal
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 55
hope they make a lower price Cellini, I love to wear leather bracelets Rolex but Cellini's price is to high for me, Rolex make a leather watch at least price range of $8k to $10k
jumping to basic Cellini here in Toronto is $17,400 right away plus Canadian Taxess.
McFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2017, 01:17 AM   #54
meganfox17
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by McFly View Post
Basic Cellini here in Toronto is $17,400 right away plus Canadian Taxess.
Whad'Ya know, well, former President Barack Obama was spotted along side Prince Harry at the Invictus Games in Toronto over the weekend wearing his first Rolex watch , 15k WG Ref 50509 CelliniMcFly ? When I was in primary school , I had a huge crush on Marty McFly ( Michael J Fox is Canadian too !) in the adventure movie about time travelling ->Back To The Future
meganfox17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2017, 02:15 AM   #55
Wcdhtwn
"TRF" Member
 
Wcdhtwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony-GB View Post
Strange that you post this. I've actually started looking into the Cellini range as have always admired from afar and am looking to actually buy one now. I've recently PM'd a member here regarding his experience on one and am awaiting a response (albeit an older reference in platinum. This one: http://www.watchclub.com/w7181/rolex...-dial-platinum )

I think the WG blue dialed is a stunner and is most likely the one I'll settle on. My one criticism of this piece is the date indicator hand should be the same as the time hands. They got the strap to follow the case shape so to overlook this minor detail of the date hand is a teeny bit sloppy:
I get what you are saying but for roughly half a month, 1st - 15th, the minute and hour hand can cover the same area of the watch a certain times of the day. Having a different hand could help someone read the date or time with a quick glance without confusing the two hands.

I like the Cellini's and attended the GTG in 2016 in Houston which had the regional manager from Rolex give a presentation on the Cellini and it's updated movement with all the shock absorption bells and whistles the sports models come with. The downside IMO is the price, as has been said lots of other watches come into play in the mid to high 20's that are more desirable and probably hold value better than the Cellini.
Wcdhtwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2017, 03:38 AM   #56
drosen1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 63
Not a huge Cellini fan. For me, it's because it doesn't fit the Rolex stereotype. Looks like a watch you would find at a cheap jewelry store, idk it just doesn't do it for me.
drosen1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2017, 03:59 AM   #57
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
I saw a pt cellini that really caught my eye. now that they are auto and have some water resistance i think i will pick one up in the future.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2017, 04:00 AM   #58
Tony64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
This question comes up quite often here. The general consensus usually seems to be that other brands make more attractive dress watches at a similar price.
^^^ This was the answer a year ago and nothing has changed.


Tony64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2017, 03:12 PM   #59
regnant
"TRF" Member
 
regnant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Close to Rolex AD
Posts: 3,474
Oyster watches are built so greatly that Celli line is overlooked. Frankly, when one says Rolex first thing that comes my mind is not a Cellini.
Cellini watches are exclusive tooo
__________________
http://s30.postimg.org/eykg4i271/A_Lange_Sohne_Movement.jpg
regnant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2017, 07:36 PM   #60
Thunderbird88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16713 & 116610LV
Posts: 368
Honestly, because JLC, PP, A.Lange & Sohne, IWC, Zenith, Omega and all the others does it better.
Even Breitling and Fredrique Constant do the dress watches better than Rolex.
I would buy any of them in a heartbeat over a Cellini.

Rolex do manufactur many gorgeous watches.
And Cellini is no doubt gorgeous, But the other manufacturers do it better. Hence why I, along with most others, would rather buy their watches.
Thunderbird88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.