The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 14 March 2018, 10:10 PM   #31
rudestew
"TRF" Member
 
rudestew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK Bristol
Watch: DSSD SD43 Mk1 50TH
Posts: 1,247
Probably right on the limit with the SD but saying that you have a great selection at 7” , I’m 8” plus and would love an explorer , still you give it a go , I know what your saying with sizing I removed the extension and half link and added a full link to find the sweet spot
rudestew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2018, 10:21 PM   #32
Wcdhtwn
"TRF" Member
 
Wcdhtwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
Replace the links you took off. Remove divers extension. Re-evaluate other links you need to remove, if any. The Extention is for wear over a wet suit. If you are not wearing a wet suit it is not needed and will not fit comfortably no matter how many oyster links you remove/adjust.

My wrist is 7 something, haven't measured it, and the only link I had removed was the extension. It fits perfectly with the glide lock extended 3 or 4 notches.
Wcdhtwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2018, 10:31 PM   #33
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
Don't give up on it yet. At 7" you should be able to pull it off easily. Could be a touch of buyers remorse and you may feel differently in a week or two. It does take some getting used to only because Rolex has gotten us used to 40m sports models, but give it a few more tries...
samson66 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2018, 10:37 PM   #34
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
...and to echo everyone else's comments - take the divers extension off for sure. It was the first thing I did. Then move the links so you end up with (best guess for your wrist) 4 links on the 6 o'clock side and 5 links on the 12 o'clock size. Remove the half link most likely. I'm at 5.5 at 12 and 4 at 6 but my wrist is about a 1/2" bigger than yours. Good luck - again try it a little longer if you can.
samson66 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2018, 10:47 PM   #35
yxc145
"TRF" Member
 
yxc145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: David
Location: Chicago
Watch: SkyD,JC, BLNR, Ex2
Posts: 1,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahllo View Post
So after waiting 6 months to get my hands on my first new Rolex (normally a vintage Sub guy) it finally arrived, a brand spanking new SD43. After trying every micro adjustment and combination of number of link etc, I have come to the decision that it's just not comfortable for me. It is a seriously beautiful watch, but for my 7 inch wrist it just seems too heavy and not ideal for the daily watch that I was hoping for. I guess its back to Vintage for me. Sometimes you gotta know when to fold em.
I have my 44mm D-blue on today. I did not even notice it till I read your posting. I rotate between 40mm GMT, 42mm Sky-D. I have 6.5" wrist. It is not too big. Like others said, try removing the diver extension link. That might help.
yxc145 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2018, 10:52 PM   #36
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Call it a day and get the SD4K instead. Better dimensions for a slender wrist and better prospects to become a collectible.
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2018, 10:57 PM   #37
dr35mm
"TRF" Member
 
dr35mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
Go for a Submariner. I had size issues with the SD43 and went for the sub, have never looked back.
__________________


Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80

Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270
dr35mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2018, 11:49 PM   #38
Ignace Worang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Jihocesky
Posts: 195
I have 7" wrist as well....try nato..it will scale down the watch
Ignace Worang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 12:11 AM   #39
tac34vt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northeast, USA
Watch: GMT2-DJ2-SubC-SD43
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahllo View Post
So after waiting 6 months to get my hands on my first new Rolex (normally a vintage Sub guy) it finally arrived, a brand spanking new SD43. After trying every micro adjustment and combination of number of link etc, I have come to the decision that it's just not comfortable for me. It is a seriously beautiful watch, but for my 7 inch wrist it just seems too heavy and not ideal for the daily watch that I was hoping for. I guess its back to Vintage for me. Sometimes you gotta know when to fold em.
Sent you a PM.
tac34vt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 12:15 AM   #40
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Good advice from the guys, also spend an afternoon at ADs trying on gold and platinum and then when you go back to your SD43 at the end of the day it will feel completely different... just like a vintage I'd say.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 12:18 AM   #41
Tebow15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
Give it time! Don’t be hasty and make a mistake


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tebow15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 12:36 AM   #42
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahllo View Post
So after waiting 6 months to get my hands on my first new Rolex (normally a vintage Sub guy) it finally arrived, a brand spanking new SD43. After trying every micro adjustment and combination of number of link etc, I have come to the decision that it's just not comfortable for me. It is a seriously beautiful watch, but for my 7 inch wrist it just seems too heavy and not ideal for the daily watch that I was hoping for. I guess its back to Vintage for me. Sometimes you gotta know when to fold em.
From a vintage Sub to SD43 is a huge jump. If you like a SubC, that would have been welcome change, you aimed too high with SD43!!

PS: Can you add a pic or two of SD43 on your wrist?
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 12:44 AM   #43
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfjan View Post
What's the reason for diver extension removal? So it doesn't stick out of the clasp by that 0.25" or so?? Or?
It's effectively two links long and as it doesn't bend in the middle (the way two liks would) it stops the bracelet curving around the wrist as well, making it less comfortable to wear (and harder to get a good bracelet fit)
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 12:50 AM   #44
dhknola
"TRF" Member
 
dhknola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,175
I lusted after that watch upon it's release...was coming back from vacation and tried it on in the Panama airport and felt like a hockey puck on my relatively small wrist and fell out of love. Hope it works for you though! For whatever it is worth, if you get 'lucky' and they don't do that watch again this year, you can flip for vintage 1680
dhknola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 01:03 AM   #45
Rahllo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 23
Wow! Thanks for all the responses. I think I'll give it a few more days and try a few more bracelet link combos. I took the diver extension off almost immediately after buying the watch which helped a lot but still not sure that it's going to work. I have to say I really appreciate all the support with a difficult decision. I sold my 1970 5513 last year to buy this thing and the idea of going back out into the vintage market is not too exciting a prospect, so if I can make this work I'll be happy. I'm sort of hoping that if I just can't connect with it that I can trade it for a vintage Sub...no uncertainty that I can pull off an old Sub on my 7' wrist!
Thanks again guys for all the help
Morgan
Rahllo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 01:51 AM   #46
Rahllo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 23
Pics as requested

Name:  SD43-1.jpg
Views: 222
Size:  113.4 KB

Name:  SD43-2.jpg
Views: 223
Size:  83.0 KB

Name:  SD43-3.jpg
Views: 223
Size:  92.0 KB
Rahllo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 03:55 AM   #47
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
I think it looks great on you. I can't speak to how it feels to you, though.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 04:07 AM   #48
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahllo View Post
Wow! Thanks for all the responses. I think I'll give it a few more days and try a few more bracelet link combos. I took the diver extension off almost immediately after buying the watch which helped a lot but still not sure that it's going to work. I have to say I really appreciate all the support with a difficult decision. I sold my 1970 5513 last year to buy this thing and the idea of going back out into the vintage market is not too exciting a prospect, so if I can make this work I'll be happy. I'm sort of hoping that if I just can't connect with it that I can trade it for a vintage Sub...no uncertainty that I can pull off an old Sub on my 7' wrist!
Thanks again guys for all the help
Morgan
Wow......that's not one move I would ever endorse (selling off that 5513 for this). You're not going to get that kind of comfort/profile from the SD43...the 5513 just wears so effortlessly and screams vintage class. Hopefully you bond with the SD43 sooner than later.....but coming from a nice 5513 this is going to be on the opposite of the spectrum.
sensui is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 04:09 AM   #49
Pmt2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
I went through the same situation. Way too heavy and big.
Pmt2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 04:12 AM   #50
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
Take a few photos with your camera pulled back further from your wrist. Hard to get an idea of fit when the camera is close to the watch.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahllo View Post
samson66 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 04:33 AM   #51
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by sensui View Post
Wow......that's not one move I would ever endorse (selling off that 5513 for this). You're not going to get that kind of comfort/profile from the SD43...the 5513 just wears so effortlessly and screams vintage class. Hopefully you bond with the SD43 sooner than later.....but coming from a nice 5513 this is going to be on the opposite of the spectrum.
Yeah, big time. Coming from a 5513 to this would be a shock to the wrist. The two watches have almost nothing in common aside from both being Rolex dive watches.
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 04:47 AM   #52
phillycheez
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 398
I have owned a couple 5513s and currently rock the sd4k.

I was in Tokyo and tried on the SD50... It's a big watch. There's no doubt about it. It wears true to its size at 43mm.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
phillycheez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 04:50 AM   #53
kangajack
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschneid View Post
Call it a day and get the SD4K instead. Better dimensions for a slender wrist and better prospects to become a collectible.


We’re going to have to wait about 30 years to see which modern references will become more sought after than others. Hopefully we’ll still be around to sort it out


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kangajack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 05:34 AM   #54
crazycarlitos
"TRF" Member
 
crazycarlitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,909
Congrats !

A watch is something u either love it at first sight or not, imo

sorry to hear that it’s not comfy.. but u will never get the SD43 to be comfy as the 5513. Lol

Since u already have it in ur hands (and u seem to like the look), give it few more days. U might just have to get used to the weight difference.

If not, u can def sell it and not lose money.

Btw it looks great on u.
__________________
crazycarlitos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 05:46 AM   #55
RedLs3
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 283
In all honesty the watch would of been perfect if they left out the cyclops. Cyclops is a datejust and sub thing. Should of kept the heritage. The point of them not having the technology until last year for the crystal is moot, humans dont dive down to 4k feet and they simply cannot... the record btw is alittle over 1000 ft by an egyptian diver. Submarines and test vessels are pressurized so diving that deep is the same as being in a kiddy pool at water park
RedLs3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 05:59 AM   #56
amh
"TRF" Member
 
amh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: Various
Posts: 5,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLs3 View Post
In all honesty the watch would of been perfect if they left out the cyclops. Cyclops is a datejust and sub thing. Should of kept the heritage. The point of them not having the technology until last year for the crystal is moot, humans dont dive down to 4k feet and they simply cannot... the record btw is alittle over 1000 ft by an egyptian diver. Submarines and test vessels are pressurized so diving that deep is the same as being in a kiddy pool at water park
Bite your tongue! I love the cyclops!

The SD43 is heavy, that's for sure. Lighter watches can be 'forgotten', this one cannot.
amh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 06:43 AM   #57
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLs3 View Post
the record btw is alittle over 1000 ft by an egyptian diver.
That's SCUBA diving. Saturation divers can go deeper - down to nearly 2000 feet. But the takeaway is the same: 4K-foot WR is already overkill, to say nothing of the absurd 12.8K feet of the DSSD.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 07:04 AM   #58
rudestew
"TRF" Member
 
rudestew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK Bristol
Watch: DSSD SD43 Mk1 50TH
Posts: 1,247
sits fine
rudestew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 07:22 AM   #59
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahllo View Post
Looks fine on you.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2018, 09:00 AM   #60
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
I was offered aSD43 from my AD but it wasn’t for me! I moved on and never looked back!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.