ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 March 2018, 10:10 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK Bristol
Watch: DSSD SD43 Mk1 50TH
Posts: 1,247
|
Probably right on the limit with the SD but saying that you have a great selection at 7” , I’m 8” plus and would love an explorer , still you give it a go , I know what your saying with sizing I removed the extension and half link and added a full link to find the sweet spot
|
14 March 2018, 10:21 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
|
Replace the links you took off. Remove divers extension. Re-evaluate other links you need to remove, if any. The Extention is for wear over a wet suit. If you are not wearing a wet suit it is not needed and will not fit comfortably no matter how many oyster links you remove/adjust.
My wrist is 7 something, haven't measured it, and the only link I had removed was the extension. It fits perfectly with the glide lock extended 3 or 4 notches. |
14 March 2018, 10:31 PM | #33 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
|
Don't give up on it yet. At 7" you should be able to pull it off easily. Could be a touch of buyers remorse and you may feel differently in a week or two. It does take some getting used to only because Rolex has gotten us used to 40m sports models, but give it a few more tries...
|
14 March 2018, 10:37 PM | #34 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
|
...and to echo everyone else's comments - take the divers extension off for sure. It was the first thing I did. Then move the links so you end up with (best guess for your wrist) 4 links on the 6 o'clock side and 5 links on the 12 o'clock size. Remove the half link most likely. I'm at 5.5 at 12 and 4 at 6 but my wrist is about a 1/2" bigger than yours. Good luck - again try it a little longer if you can.
|
14 March 2018, 10:47 PM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: David
Location: Chicago
Watch: SkyD,JC, BLNR, Ex2
Posts: 1,578
|
Quote:
|
|
14 March 2018, 10:52 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
Call it a day and get the SD4K instead. Better dimensions for a slender wrist and better prospects to become a collectible.
|
14 March 2018, 10:57 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
|
Go for a Submariner. I had size issues with the SD43 and went for the sub, have never looked back.
__________________
Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270 |
14 March 2018, 11:49 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Jihocesky
Posts: 195
|
I have 7" wrist as well....try nato..it will scale down the watch
|
15 March 2018, 12:11 AM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northeast, USA
Watch: GMT2-DJ2-SubC-SD43
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
|
|
15 March 2018, 12:15 AM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Good advice from the guys, also spend an afternoon at ADs trying on gold and platinum and then when you go back to your SD43 at the end of the day it will feel completely different... just like a vintage I'd say.
|
15 March 2018, 12:18 AM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
|
Give it time! Don’t be hasty and make a mistake
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
15 March 2018, 12:36 AM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
|
Quote:
PS: Can you add a pic or two of SD43 on your wrist? |
|
15 March 2018, 12:44 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
|
It's effectively two links long and as it doesn't bend in the middle (the way two liks would) it stops the bracelet curving around the wrist as well, making it less comfortable to wear (and harder to get a good bracelet fit)
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
15 March 2018, 12:50 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,175
|
I lusted after that watch upon it's release...was coming back from vacation and tried it on in the Panama airport and felt like a hockey puck on my relatively small wrist and fell out of love. Hope it works for you though! For whatever it is worth, if you get 'lucky' and they don't do that watch again this year, you can flip for vintage 1680
|
15 March 2018, 01:03 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 23
|
Wow! Thanks for all the responses. I think I'll give it a few more days and try a few more bracelet link combos. I took the diver extension off almost immediately after buying the watch which helped a lot but still not sure that it's going to work. I have to say I really appreciate all the support with a difficult decision. I sold my 1970 5513 last year to buy this thing and the idea of going back out into the vintage market is not too exciting a prospect, so if I can make this work I'll be happy. I'm sort of hoping that if I just can't connect with it that I can trade it for a vintage Sub...no uncertainty that I can pull off an old Sub on my 7' wrist!
Thanks again guys for all the help Morgan |
15 March 2018, 01:51 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 23
|
Pics as requested
|
15 March 2018, 03:55 AM | #47 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
I think it looks great on you. I can't speak to how it feels to you, though.
|
15 March 2018, 04:07 AM | #48 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,446
|
Quote:
|
|
15 March 2018, 04:09 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
|
I went through the same situation. Way too heavy and big.
|
15 March 2018, 04:12 AM | #50 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
|
Take a few photos with your camera pulled back further from your wrist. Hard to get an idea of fit when the camera is close to the watch.
Quote:
|
|
15 March 2018, 04:33 AM | #51 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
|
|
15 March 2018, 04:47 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 398
|
I have owned a couple 5513s and currently rock the sd4k.
I was in Tokyo and tried on the SD50... It's a big watch. There's no doubt about it. It wears true to its size at 43mm. Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk |
15 March 2018, 04:50 AM | #53 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
We’re going to have to wait about 30 years to see which modern references will become more sought after than others. Hopefully we’ll still be around to sort it out Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
15 March 2018, 05:34 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,909
|
Congrats !
A watch is something u either love it at first sight or not, imo sorry to hear that it’s not comfy.. but u will never get the SD43 to be comfy as the 5513. Lol Since u already have it in ur hands (and u seem to like the look), give it few more days. U might just have to get used to the weight difference. If not, u can def sell it and not lose money. Btw it looks great on u.
__________________
|
15 March 2018, 05:46 AM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 283
|
In all honesty the watch would of been perfect if they left out the cyclops. Cyclops is a datejust and sub thing. Should of kept the heritage. The point of them not having the technology until last year for the crystal is moot, humans dont dive down to 4k feet and they simply cannot... the record btw is alittle over 1000 ft by an egyptian diver. Submarines and test vessels are pressurized so diving that deep is the same as being in a kiddy pool at water park
|
15 March 2018, 05:59 AM | #56 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: Various
Posts: 5,082
|
Quote:
The SD43 is heavy, that's for sure. Lighter watches can be 'forgotten', this one cannot. |
|
15 March 2018, 06:43 AM | #57 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
|
15 March 2018, 07:04 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK Bristol
Watch: DSSD SD43 Mk1 50TH
Posts: 1,247
|
sits fine
|
15 March 2018, 07:22 AM | #59 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Quote:
|
|
15 March 2018, 09:00 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
I was offered aSD43 from my AD but it wasn’t for me! I moved on and never looked back!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.