The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 June 2018, 03:49 PM   #1
imperio
"TRF" Member
 
imperio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: this space
Posts: 1,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
i still don't see what greed has to do with anything. Sales tax was always "due" the only thing that has changed is who is collecting it. I suspect if the compliance was higher from the buyer competing the tax form with the state then it wouldn't be necessary, but they don't and think its a "tax free"... its not. IMO its preventing tax cheating.


Agreed!
__________________
imperio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2018, 07:25 AM   #2
swils8610
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swils8610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,211
Typical...surprised it took this long.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
swils8610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2018, 05:12 PM   #3
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
I guess this is good news...? Tax evasion is what it has been.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2018, 09:07 PM   #4
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayerische View Post
I guess this is good news...? Tax evasion is what it has been.
+1

and it also has been unfair competition for in-state brick & mortar stores with in-state employees and in-state tax payments.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2018, 09:24 PM   #5
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
+1

and it also has been unfair competition for in-state brick & mortar stores with in-state employees and in-state tax payments.
that is my biggest issue. People use B&M for show rooming and buy online and don't pay tax. Its like 8-10% less right off the bat and not taking overhead into account but with that is even more. I like physical stores and if the show roomers are not careful they wont even have a place to see physical products anymore as they are disappearing at an alarming rate.

Ive said it before halfway serious but AD's should charge $50 to try on watches if you are not an established customer. At least that way they get some benefit from people using their establishment with no intent to buy anything. The fee is applicable to a future AD watch purchase.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2018, 09:02 PM   #6
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,795
I'm just glad that I #1 already bought my two Rolex watches from trusted sellers prior to this warning, and #2 that I'm about 30 min away from tax-free Delaware which is where I make most of my large purchases (including my latest Black Bay) anyway.
samson66 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2018, 11:05 PM   #7
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,801
The devil is in the details. I understand the ruling but think enforcement and compliance is going to be very difficult against smaller businesses and companies. How will you handle shipping enforcement to ensure compliance. Many of the transaction I do are trades and fall outside of the sales tax issue for the value of the item I am trading. I would only be liable for extra cash for the trade. 50 states with different rules will set up a mess. Not worried as prices are what they are and adjustments can be made to allow for my best outcome. Buying the watches I want.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2018, 03:44 PM   #8
rolehex
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rolehex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,445
I don't care about tax on new items but second hand items that were already charged tax a one time should not be charged tax again.
rolehex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2018, 04:00 PM   #9
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolehex View Post
I don't care about tax on new items but second hand items that were already charged tax a one time should not be charged tax again.
Agreed, marginal taxation should be present though.

This is how it is in the EU. VAT is added only on new items.

Can of course be added by a VAT registered business ontop of a used items price aswell, but makes no sense to add around 20%. Is often done on items sold/traded between businesses as the VAT is claimable. But not to consumers as VAT can't be claimed by a consumer.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.