The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 December 2008, 01:29 PM   #31
tudorman8276
"TRF" Member
 
tudorman8276's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,583
...Freddie...

...WELL SAID.

...X-2!

Stan.
tudorman8276 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 01:50 PM   #32
casadecamporolex
"TRF" Member
 
casadecamporolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Louie
Location: CDC/FCGC
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 1,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnEaton View Post
Purchases worse than ROLEX: A perspective

I'd say Citi or Crude futures six months ago and any Madoff investment comes to mind...
[My SS Daytona is still worth $2-3K more than I paid for it]




Re: You want to know something that really holds its value and is always in style CASH!

For deflationary times YES, but How long before inflation or hyper-inflation kicks in, how will you cash hold up then?
One of the positions I had in mid 2008 were corporate bonds in a small unknown company called Lehman Bros. Each $100 worth about 1.5 cents now. Paper cheaper than toilet paper.
Talk about a turn of events never seen before, wiping out $$$$$$$'s.
Cash is good now, gold bullion is a must for 2009.
casadecamporolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 02:04 PM   #33
Whiskey
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 521
I've had this discussion with many people. The ones who always lose are the cigarette-smokers.

I have a buddy of mine who's pretty much a half-pack a day smoker.

I've asked him to estimate what he spends in a year on smokes. I believe the figure he gave me was something like $3500 a year.

I've told him had he saved that money he could have had a nice watch, a car, or a trip.

I find that both genders tend to frown on my expensive watch.

1. Women because they figure I should be spending it on what else......a woman.

2. Men, because they believe I should be spending it on a woman.
Whiskey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 02:13 PM   #34
TempoKing
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
...Wanna buy a watch...???....Or what...?....
TempoKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 02:26 PM   #35
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by casadecamporolex View Post
One of the positions I had in mid 2008 were corporate bonds in a small unknown company called Lehman Bros. Each $100 worth about 1.5 cents now. Paper cheaper than toilet paper.
Talk about a turn of events never seen before, wiping out $$$$$$$'s.
Cash is good now, gold bullion is a must for 2009.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TempoKing View Post
...Wanna buy a watch...???....Or what...?....
In my opinion: Agreed...

Cash is king Now

Gold will be king next 1 to 4 years

But wait longer than that to flip your Rolex

And yes, Anastasios, I do want to buy a watch
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 02:53 PM   #36
2careless
"TRF" Member
 
2careless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
Guys you reckon gold still got legs?
2careless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 03:19 PM   #37
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2careless View Post
Guys you reckon gold still got legs?
YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET

It is impossible to drop eight plus trillion of fiat and not have inflation...

I stated on this forum months ago I don't want to see what it feels like to live in a world where the DOW and Gold are 3000; I hope I'm at worse case scenario there. But I am thinking gold will hit at least $1500/oz before we see economy and jobs stabilize. JMHO
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 04:14 PM   #38
ROLEX MAN
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
ROLEX MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: Home and Away
Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"!
Posts: 3,719
sometimes holidays are just stress!
__________________


it's not just about telling the time...

happy rolexing...



I'm just a man with a passion
ROLEX MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 10:41 PM   #39
rpryan55
"TRF" Member
 
rpryan55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by tnt View Post
I purchased 3 Rolexes for my husband....he says...ok...which made me feel like wasted the money

few weeks back, I bought a pre-owned Porsche 911 turbo for him, with $50k cashed out straightly from my savings..+ insurance....and he jumped to the ceiling.....he cleans his turbo everyday....I have never seen that happy as he is right now....so, I think it was a very worthy purchase for his happiness
Please send me your address so I can leave my wife and marry you.
__________________
“The only reason for time .......................
is so that everything doesn't happen at once."
Albert Einstein
rpryan55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2008, 11:04 PM   #40
miked10270
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: N/a
Location: N/a
Watch: N/a
Posts: 55
Quote:
I purchased 3 Rolexes for my husband... bought a pre-owned Porsche 911 turbo for him
Quote:
Originally Posted by rpryan55 View Post
Please send me your address so I can leave my wife and marry you.
Err... YOUR end of the queue is about a half mile down there!

Mike.
miked10270 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 02:18 AM   #41
tphan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 831
This is the reason why we don't have the M5 park in the garage. Three years from now my ss daytona might drop another thousand or so but not with the BMW.

Buy gold and/or land is the answer.
tphan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 02:55 AM   #42
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
I'm guilt free about all of my purchases, so I don't spend hours comparing depreciation of automobiles to watches (last I checked you can't drive to work on a Rolex though) or trying to measures in the intangible pleasures of travel to a material possession.

I suggest we make the OP sticky though. It would be perfect "ammo" and "medicine" for those starting the never ending neurotic threads (like this one) justifying the purchase to themselves or asking about what they should say / think when their friends, co-workers OR SPOUSES, make snide remarks about their fancy new watches.
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 03:21 AM   #43
ErikAalto
"TRF" Member
 
ErikAalto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Erik
Location: Clayton, NC
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 322
I walked out of the Toyota dealership having paid $25,300 for my Toyota Prius (all taxes/registration included). I probably could have gotten a $13,000 base model Corolla (maybe out the door for $10k less), but the fact is it would not have made driving the cheaper car any more enjoyable even if I had a Daytona on my wrist if I took the difference.

Granted, my watch spends about nearly 24 hours a day on my wrist, it is honestly secondary to all of those things that you mentioned.

We spend a considerable amount of our lifetime on our furniture, in our car, and remembering our trips. What kind of life have you lived if all you can reflect on is a bunch of watches that you bought rather than experiencing life itself?

I would not hesitate to take a $6,000 vacation with my wife over buying a new Rolex. I would not hesitate to refurnish my house with $6,000 over buying a new Rolex. I would not purchase a vehicle that was $6,000 less nice, over buying a new Rolex.

In any of those situations, if I bought a new Rolex, I'd have a pissed off wife who could have had a nice vacation, a lot of nice new furniture, or a much nicer car.

Who cares about depreciation? Does everything you do in life have to focus on cost? Don't you remember those Mastercard commercials? 6 round trip tickets to Barbados - $6,000, Room/Board/Activities - $4,000, spending time with your loved ones - PRICELESS?
ErikAalto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 03:28 AM   #44
wzz
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Jason
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 175
I like Silver more than Gold in 2009.
wzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 03:47 AM   #45
GoldenBear
"TRF" Member
 
GoldenBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,480
It doesn't have to be an either or thing. It would be foolish to spend all of your money on multiple watches and not travel and enjoy all of the other opportunities such as buying a house, etc. By the same token, when you do have the money, there is nothing better than getting your first really nice watch. I was into my thirties and it was worth the wait for both. For me, it is really about balance. Having several nice thing and not overloading on any one.
__________________
____________________________________________
Rolex Blue TT Submariner
Rolex SS Submariner
Breitling Emergency Mission

**They are just watches, wear 'em.**
____________________________________________
GoldenBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 04:10 AM   #46
SPORTSFAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: NW England
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBear View Post
It doesn't have to be an either or thing. It would be foolish to spend all of your money on multiple watches and not travel and enjoy all of the other opportunities such as buying a house, etc. By the same token, when you do have the money, there is nothing better than getting your first really nice watch. I was into my thirties and it was worth the wait for both. For me, it is really about balance. Having several nice thing and not overloading on any one.
Sounds spot on to me............

I don't want to spend any more than I already have on watches.

Regards Mike.
SPORTSFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 04:20 AM   #47
stusrt
"TRF" Member
 
stusrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Motor City
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,114
If I had $30,000 to spend on transportation - I would get a $20,000 awesome motorcycle and a used $10,000 car.

I know it's stupid, but everyone has their priorities on what is most important when it comes to money.
So if someone wants to blow $100,000 on a Paul Newman Daytona, $75,000 on a car;
I say good for them!
stusrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 04:49 AM   #48
BTSinAustin
"TRF" Member
 
BTSinAustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by milspec View Post
yesterday I met a friend and as we were talking, he mentioned he got a new car. I remember he bought one new car about 6 yrs ago for $18,000. Then spent money decking it up and adding accessories. He told me that the bluebook value is only $2,500 -- $4,500, after adding 80,000miles.

Just look at the money he lost: $15,000 gone, insurance $$ for the last 6 yrs and gas $$ for the last 6 yrs ....and now his car's value is steadily declining....

So I told him he should have bought a couple of ROLEXes instead, since this car was a pleasure and not a necessity ... the value and demand of a rolex would still be there ....

Another friend spent $18,000 on furniture... one stupid dining table, 2 beds and 3 cabinets .....could have done it way way cheaper for similar quality but had the $$ to throw away .... you know how hard a time he would have if he were to try to sell this stuff back?

Another friend spent $4800 on a TV and sound system last year ... one little malfunction and it is all over .....

My parents took a european cruise ... flew from Los Angeles to Spain ... spent about $6,000 and now all they come back with is a DVD of what they did and some stories and memories that are fading fast ....$6,000..that's a freakin GMT IIc ......yeah they enjoyed, had a good time blah blah blah but got nothing much to show for that $$ ,,,,,one dvd and some pics in their digital camera.....


So the lesson is that don't feel bad about your rolex purchase ... there are enough dumb things we do in our lives that make a rolex purchase seem and actually makes it a real wise decision...just think of all other places you are throwing your money and have nothing to show for it after 5-10 yrs ....apart from buying real estate, gold or investing in the long term, there is not much out there where you can make a purchase, use it and enjoy it and your item still be in demand when you sell it...



My story, somewhere around 1978 or 79 I almost bought a TT DJ, it was maybe 900.00? Instead I bought a Seiko for 200. What a bad decision.
BTSinAustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 07:01 AM   #49
DHLChief
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Walt
Location: Minneapolis
Watch: Savings Vaporize
Posts: 268
I agree as well. This year I bought two pre owned Rolex watches from an AD, one for myself and one for my wife. Compared to my investment portfolio, that has lost 30% this year, the watches have held their own. No regrets!
DHLChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 08:44 AM   #50
BZA
"TRF" Member
 
BZA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: B
Location: UK
Posts: 976
As others have said, its all about balance. Nice watches are meant to be an enrichment to life, rather than a replacement for living life.

Wearing a nice watch whilst on holiday, at an event, etc just makes the time spent more memorable and the watch more meaningful to you
__________________
Current: 1: Rolex DSSD M 2008 2: Rolex Day-Date 40 YG White Dial Random 2018 3:Panerai Luminor Submersible Titanium PAM 25 2013 P
Previous:[/B] 1: Rolex 16610 Y 2002 2: Rolex Daytona V 2008 3: Rolex 16610LV Z 2007 4: Rolex Milgauss 116400GV V 2008 5: Panerai Luminor Marina PR PAM 93 2005 6: AP ROO Diver H 2013 7: Rolex DJ II Slate w/ Grn Romans Random 2013 8:Panerai Submersible Ti PAM 25 2013
BZA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 11:33 AM   #51
Defiancekofb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmh1013 View Post
I use to dress flashy back when I was young ,30-35 trying to impress the ladies ....and I did ...the wrong type. LV purse babes that took 3k+ a month
to keep them happy....I was dumb, then got smarter.
Dumped the expensive suits and cars...and the girlfriends
Now that I cant work and must be watch all our funds.
If you look at me now I look lower middle class, wife shops garage sales,Wal-mart all sorts of nasty places.
Except for the watch I like looking poor.
AMEN on the walmart thing, This is what I never got. You can get 1 Hanes Medium white undershirt at Urban Outfitters for $25, but if you go to walmart, you can get the same Hanes Medium white undershirt in a 5 pack for $17. I guess the Urban Outfitters know something I don't..........

PS - Greg I dress like a bum too, alot of people probably think my watch is fake.
Defiancekofb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 12:23 PM   #52
Boopie
"TRF" Member
 
Boopie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 3,952
I agree in part with the OP and in part with others commenting. It all depends on your perspective, and what you can afford. It is helpful to always look at the opportunity cost of something, whether it's a child's birthday party, going out to dinner, financing a college education, traveling, or buying a car. I live within my means, but also enjoy what I can afford.

I don't drive an ultra-luxury car (no Porsche Cayenne or BMW 7 series for me) but I have had a MBZ (C-class) and currently have an Acura MDX. They have both been very pleasant to drive, and are safe for my kids. Frankly I have enjoyed having leather seats and other creature comforts. When I was in college, I owned a stripped-down Toyota Tercel with hand-crank windows, no A/C, and cheesy cloth-covered seats. That's all I could afford then, and there was no shame in owning it. I graduated from college and law school without debt, in great measure because I didn't outspend my means. That being said, I prefer my luxury cars, just as I prefer my Rolex.

While I don't have high-end designer clothing (e.g. from Neiman Marcus or Barney's), I do get most of my casual clothes from Nordstrom, not from J.C. Penney. All of my business suits are designed by me and custom made for me by a Hong Kong tailor. I realize that probably all of my clothes have zero resale value. But, in my line of work I'm just not going to wear a polyester outfit that I got from Target for $80. So, yeah, I easily could have bought a Daytona with the money that I've spent on clothes on the last 10 years.

I fly coach and don't stay at the Four Seasons or Ritz Carlton when I travel, but I don't stay at the Motel 6, either. Spending money on travel, when you can afford it, is money well spent for the experiences and memories.

I cherish my Rolex because we could afford to buy it. If we had gone into serious debt to buy it, then it wouldn't be worth it.
Boopie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 12:37 PM   #53
rpryan55
"TRF" Member
 
rpryan55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boopie View Post
I agree in part with the OP and in part with others commenting. It all depends on your perspective, and what you can afford. It is helpful to always look at the opportunity cost of something, whether it's a child's birthday party, going out to dinner, financing a college education, traveling, or buying a car. I live within my means, but also enjoy what I can afford.

I don't drive an ultra-luxury car (no Porsche Cayenne or BMW 7 series for me) but I have had a MBZ (C-class) and currently have an Acura MDX. They have both been very pleasant to drive, and are safe for my kids. Frankly I have enjoyed having leather seats and other creature comforts. When I was in college, I owned a stripped-down Toyota Tercel with hand-crank windows, no A/C, and cheesy cloth-covered seats. That's all I could afford then, and there was no shame in owning it. I graduated from college and law school without debt, in great measure because I didn't outspend my means. That being said, I prefer my luxury cars, just as I prefer my Rolex.

While I don't have high-end designer clothing (e.g. from Neiman Marcus or Barney's), I do get most of my casual clothes from Nordstrom, not from J.C. Penney. All of my business suits are designed by me and custom made for me by a Hong Kong tailor. I realize that probably all of my clothes have zero resale value. But, in my line of work I'm just not going to wear a polyester outfit that I got from Target for $80. So, yeah, I easily could have bought a Daytona with the money that I've spent on clothes on the last 10 years.

I fly coach and don't stay at the Four Seasons or Ritz Carlton when I travel, but I don't stay at the Motel 6, either. Spending money on travel, when you can afford it, is money well spent for the experiences and memories.

I cherish my Rolex because we could afford to buy it. If we had gone into serious debt to buy it, then it wouldn't be worth it.

This could've been written by my wife and I. Could not agree more.
__________________
“The only reason for time .......................
is so that everything doesn't happen at once."
Albert Einstein
rpryan55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 01:10 PM   #54
Mrdi
Banned
 
Mrdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
Odd discussion.
I imagine most here to be relatively affluent.
This is not an either or forum.
Second base is not better than third or first.
You gotta touch'em all.
Happy New Year.




Mrdi
Mrdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 01:40 PM   #55
Denny M
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBear View Post
It doesn't have to be an either or thing. It would be foolish to spend all of your money on multiple watches and not travel and enjoy all of the other opportunities such as buying a house, etc. By the same token, when you do have the money, there is nothing better than getting your first really nice watch. I was into my thirties and it was worth the wait for both. For me, it is really about balance. Having several nice thing and not overloading on any one.
Wise words, i believe it's about balance too.

I think along the lines of having 1 good house in a nice area (until i can afford more), 1 reliable car, 1 quality watch, 1 overseas holiday a year etc. Having multiple watches and constantly upgrading/changing cars, especially if not in a financial position to do so, seems excessive and not a good use of funds. I estimate my brother has spent over $100k on cars in the past few years and now only has the one average car to show for it and a large mortgage to boot.
Denny M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 02:24 PM   #56
East Bay Rider
"TRF" Member
 
East Bay Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
My story is contrary to many of yours.
My wife and I have not really vacationed away since our honeymoon in '92. We rented for a few years and saved as much as we could, then had a baby, then bought a house etc. We do go away for a couple of weekends away every year or two. We were saving for a nice vacation but then my wife got a new job and couldn't get away for the trip so she took the vacation money and bought me my watch for our 15th anniversary gift. Maybe I don't have great trip memories etc. but I'll tell you what, when I look at my watch I see a loving sacrifice made by my wife and this watch is a symbol of that. I guess she thought that I was worth more than that trip as well.
I agree with the OP that there are many things we spend $$ on and at the end of the year there is nothing to show for it. My older cars have been paid off for years and are considered low mileage. The smart thing to do is to keep them now and just use them. My house is small, efficient, well maintained and suitable for small family of 3. Not very impressive to many I'm sure but the fact pointed out by the OP is that the watch is still valuable as our consumerables become worthless.
A wise man once said "Live within your means, not your dreams."
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man
Floating down canal
It doesn't use numbers or moving hands
It always just says "now"
Now you may be thinking that I was had
But this watch is never wrong
And if I have trouble the warranty said
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
J. Buffett
Instagram: eastbayrider46
East Bay Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.