The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 January 2009, 09:16 AM   #31
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
Search, there are plenty of posting from forums members with the M and not the 3186 that is why you can find "The Wiggle Test" instructions on the board..

I all M were 3186 there would be no need for the wiggle test.

Yes, I know I said I was done BUT I am answering a legit ?
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 09:47 AM   #32
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
:

I am done with this thread

NEXT!
I guess you had one more in you. I am laughing with you Jeremy, not at you, very funny.

That's twice today you made me laugh.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 11:02 AM   #33
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
Search, there are plenty of posting from forums members with the M and not the 3186 that is why you can find "The Wiggle Test" instructions on the board..

I all M were 3186 there would be no need for the wiggle test.

Yes, I know I said I was done BUT I am answering a legit ?

I believe you are mistaken, it is my understanding that all M's do have the 3186, it is the Z's that are hit & miss.
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 11:24 AM   #34
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDHNTER View Post
I believe you are mistaken, it is my understanding that all M's do have the 3186, it is the Z's that are hit & miss.
This is true, that is why my late Z came with the new GMT booklet highlighting the new hairspring. During this time frame Rolex was apparently grabbing movements off the shelf and putting them into the GMT II's. Some got the 3185, some got the 3186, that is why I make the point of taking the 3186 out of a Explorer II and putting it in my late Z, no one would know and no one should care, it does not add value.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 11:47 AM   #35
tubojunk
"TRF" Member
 
tubojunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2careless View Post
It's all perception mate.
Finally someone said it, 3186 v 3185, stick vs non-stick, it doesn't mean a thing unless the buyer places value on that. And the value is all based on the buyer's perception of these characteristics, not you or me. If they want to pay more for it, great, if not good for them.

As for explorers not receiving any hype with 3186, it's simple. Explorers with 3186 are still in production while GMTs with 3186 aluminum bezel are discontinued.
__________________
Audemars 15707ce
Lange 191.032
Patek 5990/1a
Rolex 126610LN
tubojunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 12:07 PM   #36
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
Search, there are plenty of posting from forums members with the M and not the 3186 that is why you can find "The Wiggle Test" instructions on the board..

I all M were 3186 there would be no need for the wiggle test.

Yes, I know I said I was done BUT I am answering a legit ?
Jeremy,

Easy question to answer. Show me a GMT II 'M' with a 3185 movement.

I checked the 'wiggle test' with my 'M' GMT II against my GMT IIc TT and it looked the same so I presumed it was a 3186. I took the back off and fitted a clear case bask and yes it was a 3186. Some members have appeared confused when evaluating the 'wiggle test' in the absence of a comparison.

I'm done with this thread - I'm done with this thread. Sorry - double post.

Ha - an 'M' with a 3186 - only real way to tell if it's even a Rolex movement.
Attached Images
 
__________________
E

Andad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 12:14 PM   #37
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Buying any 16710 at a premium is hype pricing, regardless of what movement or dial it has.

If history is any indication, then a few years down the road prices will stabilize and it is very unlikely that the 3186 (which is a 3185 with a different main mounting plate and a couple of moved gears) will make any difference at all.

Right now slick sellers are making a few extra bucks....it won't last long..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 12:55 PM   #38
Lubrifar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Mr. T
Location: anc/sfo
Watch: for the signs!
Posts: 776
Regardless of what series and for how much, after reading this entire thread, I am just happy to pay a little over $5k for my M3186 six months ago ... BNIB from an AD with no sale tax.
Lubrifar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 01:13 PM   #39
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
Look through the old for sale ads, I dont have the time or care enough to
BUT there were plenty of M's with the 3185....

But..........

WHO CARES?????
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 02:30 PM   #40
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,528
Ok, no pix, so I will accept that you are wr..wro...wron.....mistaken?
__________________
E

Andad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 03:19 PM   #41
2careless
"TRF" Member
 
2careless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
Look through the old for sale ads, I dont have the time or care enough to
BUT there were plenty of M's with the 3185....

But..........

WHO CARES?????
As long as there are people willing to buy the 3186 GMT2 at a premium, there is a market. Nobody forces buyers to pay $6k for a GMT2, but do ask hkperf how many GMT2 3186 he has sold http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=43153

People don't care because he/she got a 3185 and don't want to admit it's the second last/best
OR they are not going to sell it and will just enjoy the watch.
2careless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 12:33 AM   #42
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2careless View Post
People don't care because he/she got a 3185 and don't want to admit it's the second last/best
OR they are not going to sell it and will just enjoy the watch.
Just enjoying the watch, now that's a novel idea. I wish people would just buy the watch they liked the most and not the one they though might be worth something 50 years down the road. Seriously, sometimes it seems like people are looking for investment advice, and all people ever say is watches are horrible investments, yet people keep thinking they are buying the next Comex models.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 12:42 AM   #43
Darren Retour
"TRF" Member
 
Darren Retour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bexley Kent
Watch: Bluesy M
Posts: 141
Quick question, i know its been done before but i thought i would ask:

Has a 16613 Sub M Serial the 3185 or 3186 ???

Darren
Darren Retour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 01:41 AM   #44
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darren Retour View Post
Quick question, i know its been done before but i thought i would ask:

Has a 16613 Sub M Serial the 3185 or 3186 ???

Darren
Neither just a Cal 3135 but all of the mens Rolex watches movements except for the chronographs. Are all just basically clones of the 3135 with or without added complications.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 04:02 AM   #45
CPTL
"TRF" Member
 
CPTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Texas on my mind
Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ
Posts: 2,445
I don't think there are any M serial GMT-IIs with the 3185. We first started discussing the wiggle test here in late 2007, before Rolex released its first M. It was first posted and discussed on another forum prior to that.
__________________

16610 Submariner Date; D Serial
16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial
16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial

And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial
CPTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 06:42 AM   #46
krattzz
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC, Philly.
Watch: GMT BLNR
Posts: 695
Why is there always one person that comes onto a thread to throw in an inciting comment? But since you made it an issue he is asking $5700 for a NIB “M” Series Coke GMT with all stickers in tact, however the card is filled in so I would call this LNIB and don’t think it’s that great of a deal considering I can get ones from - http://www.demesy.com/p/50951.html or http://www.demesy.com/p/51561.html
krattzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 07:00 AM   #47
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by karmatp View Post
Just enjoying the watch, now that's a novel idea. I wish people would just buy the watch they liked the most and not the one they though might be worth something 50 years down the road. Seriously, sometimes it seems like people are looking for investment advice, and all people ever say is watches are horrible investments, yet people keep thinking they are buying the next Comex models.
Bravo! So true...I understand it's human nature to want to find the best price possible, but in the end it really comes down to if you like the product and YOU think it's worth the price, then get it and don't worry about it. 'Not worth the $' is such a subjective statement that it drives me crazy...any product, be it a watch, car, house, ect. is 'worth' what it sells for to each individual buyer...regardless of what others might say.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.