ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 April 2009, 11:30 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Down under
Watch: my wrist candy
Posts: 567
|
An inconvenient truth: we're all getting fatter.....So need larger watches to match........but seriously the trend in obesity is not a laughing matter.
|
19 April 2009, 11:40 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Peter
Location: Canada
Watch: You know... Rolex
Posts: 1,520
|
Big response to a topic I was going to post. Looks like I got beat to the punch. All I have to add is that at work I like my little by todays standards 34mm air-king. At the beach or weekends I enjoy my Sub.
To each and everyones own. I will say that I am not a fan of the chuncky watch cases on the new Subs they seem wider to fit the look of as some people say wider butts ha ha |
19 April 2009, 11:44 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: 16622
Posts: 536
|
All I would say is that Rolex Daytona must be at least 43mm in diameter !
__________________
16622 |
20 April 2009, 01:02 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: David
Location: SW Fla
Watch: SS Daytona & TT DJ
Posts: 1,430
|
True! Maybe we're headed for the day when they charge more for an airplane seat if you're wearing an alarm clock on your wrist.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.