ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
12 October 2020, 08:01 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Ontario
Watch: TT Skydwelli
Posts: 850
|
Lets be honest here. The 38mm was originally a womens model
|
12 October 2020, 11:05 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: NE
Posts: 2,899
|
|
12 October 2020, 04:03 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: KP Jimmy
Location: Singapore
Watch: R/AP/FPJ/Hermès/et
Posts: 6,597
|
__________________
|
13 October 2020, 11:00 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Jason
Location: Maine
Watch: AP & Patek
Posts: 462
|
|
21 October 2020, 02:22 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Quote:
|
|
21 October 2020, 04:50 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
39mm is the way to go IMO.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
21 October 2020, 05:01 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 6,002
|
For AP ROC, it's either 38mm 26315st or 41mm 26331st only, there is no 39mm for new one.
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. AP: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) PP: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Carree 2961, YG Carree, Tank W5000156 Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996" |
21 October 2020, 05:06 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Real Name: Jacob Nalbandy
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: LNTrialLawyers.com
Posts: 78
|
41 always!!
|
21 October 2020, 06:14 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Rick
Location: Wakanda
Watch: amacallit
Posts: 2,090
|
38mm gets my vote , I will however wait till AP starts making their own chrono module.
Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk
__________________
रोलेक्स |
25 October 2020, 12:43 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Asia , Malaysia
Posts: 186
|
I’ve always thought the 41mm is good to go , I have a 7 inch wrist .
Used to wear my 5 digits Rolex nicely , I have a 6 digits sub, but it always feel chunky and extra size . Until I visit the Boutique of AP and tried it on , I know what I want. AP wears extra 1-2mm on wrist But on side by side , you notice huge difference. But on the wrist , is all back to your personality and your own taste Side by side - you see the big difference 38mm on 7 inch wrist - I prefer this size ( feeling like wearing a 5 digits subs , or Daytona C ) 41mm on 7 inch ( it wear chunky and heavy , feeling like wearing 44mm panerai ) Hope it helps |
25 October 2020, 02:59 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 2,173
|
I like the 41mm size in general but the proportions to me look better on a 38.
|
1 November 2020, 03:26 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: Day Date 40 Olive
Posts: 32
|
38mm fit my 6.5" wrist, 41mm fits more like a 43 or 44 from other brands.
|
4 November 2020, 07:40 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 441
|
38mm for sure even if you have a big wrist .
I avoid wearing my 41mm because it feels huge on the wrist. |
19 November 2020, 06:10 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cali
Posts: 39
|
How difficult is it to find the stainless 38mm ROCs at boutiques nowadays?
|
19 November 2020, 06:14 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Posts: 1,365
|
Good photos above for context, thanks. I have the 41mm ROC and have considered downsizing for a more wearable size rather than a "statement piece" size but I'm not sure about the thickness/width proportions. The 38mm always seems like it has been squashed, and with a dainty bracelet taper, but maybe it's just the angles.
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
__________________
Once you aquire your "grail"... then what?! |
19 November 2020, 06:38 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,622
|
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
19 November 2020, 08:12 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 6,002
|
From your picture, 41mm looks perfect on your wrist.
38mm has a smaller bracelet so it doesn't look as elegant as 41mm.
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. AP: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) PP: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Carree 2961, YG Carree, Tank W5000156 Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996" |
19 November 2020, 09:36 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,622
|
Thanks! I think my 39mm 15202 wears just a tad small but perfect too which is why I would think a 38mm ROC would wear small, maybe the chrono pushers make it wear bigger.
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
19 November 2020, 09:44 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: NE
Posts: 2,899
|
Great perspective on this thread. Next to each other, its almost comical how different they are in sizes. On the wrist though, totally different experience and you adjust quickly. Think wearing a daytona and then going to a SD43. Or having them next to each other..
|
20 November 2020, 12:04 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,500
|
I have a 7” wrist and my 25860 (39) fits me like a glove.
For me, the 38s wears a little small and 41 overhangs with the bracelet flare. 38s good option for 6.75 or smaller. IMHO 41s good option for 7.25 or larger. iMHO , That leaves those of us with the most common wrist sizes (6.75-7.25) knowing the 39 would offer the best fit. AP only has one option for us...Jumbo. Coincidence? I think not. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
20 November 2020, 12:35 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Europe/Asia
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 1,352
|
I always feel close up wrist shots make the smaller sizes look better whereas further out sometimes tend to make their dials look smaller overall on the wrist.
Best to see pics further away, like about 20 cm, as that is more true to real life scenario. I also feel larger ROC looks nicer at this range, even on smaller wrists. I was almost set on 37mm RO on my 6.2 inch wrist from pics, until I tried both 41mm and 37mm in store and found the dial on the 37mm way too small so went with a 41mm. Best to try at a dealer and look at it yourself in real life. |
20 November 2020, 01:19 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 173
|
i had an old 14060 sub and the new panda daytona, and recently got the 38mm chrono from AP, they wear similar. i have about a 6-6.25" wrist. if you like the way your 39 OP or 40 sub fits, stick with the 38 imo
|
20 November 2020, 10:20 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Asia , Malaysia
Posts: 186
|
38 on 7”inch again
|
22 November 2020, 10:50 PM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,547
|
Simple -- do you like:
1. large watches that dominate the wrist, or 2. a more classic look, the watch is noticeable but not dominant Personally , I used to be a (2), now a (1) but preferences differ. |
24 November 2020, 12:39 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Jason
Location: Maine
Watch: AP & Patek
Posts: 462
|
I am the opposite, used to be 1 now I am 2. I think the bigger watches look like you are trying to hard to say "look at my watch," at least for me it was. Thats what makes the world go around. Enjoy what "fits" you best.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.