ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
20 October 2020, 12:45 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,975
|
All my Daytona's are the same, some are +1 and some are +2 and they stay like that every single day.
Positioning makes hardly any difference; they are incredible movements. Esp compared to the speedmaster 1861 which is very sensitive to position. The 3861 is exactly the same as Daytona. Very consistent, very accurate. |
20 October 2020, 01:24 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
Quote:
|
|
20 October 2020, 12:52 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 515
|
My SD43 is consistently 20 seconds slow per month. Once a month I set my watch 10 seconds fast. I am then at most within 10 seconds of atomic clock time all month. That is outrageous accuracy for a mechanical movement.
It came out of the Rolex factory very well adjusted. The delta between face up and crown down (largest deviation) is 4 SPD. I suggest checking it once a month. If you are within a minute a month, you are within Rolex specs. If it is significantly more than that, get it checked out and regulated. |
20 October 2020, 01:13 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
|
|
20 October 2020, 01:16 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 515
|
|
20 October 2020, 01:06 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,625
|
|
20 October 2020, 01:13 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 515
|
get yourself a $200 timegrapher on Amazon and see for yourself what the slowest position is for your watch. Rest it in that position at night.
|
20 October 2020, 01:17 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
|
Yes, one can only make statements if one has some reliable data. A timegrapher is also very useful to see the difference before/after a service of the watch caliber ... That was my way to spot that the initial 32xx calibers had severe problems.
|
20 October 2020, 01:15 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2020
Location: usa
Posts: 111
|
My Daytona has always been +! but it doesn't bother me at all.
|
20 October 2020, 01:17 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 90
|
Yes. Perfectly normal. As stated above, depends on how stored and how worn.
Better to be a little fast, since it's easier to hack to slow down. |
20 October 2020, 01:25 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 515
|
A buddy of mine is an engineer, and spent most of his day working on a computer. His sub was face up on his wrist most of the day. His watch was consistently +2.5 spd. He retired and isn't constantly on the computer anymore. His watch is now consistently +1.5 spd.
|
20 October 2020, 04:50 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
I don't see any merit in it. It's normal, and it could be even more accurate. My Datejust has a movement 3135 with almost 32 years is in -0.26666 a day, or -8 seconds a month
|
21 October 2020, 03:46 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
|
Always plus, never minus.
|
20 October 2020, 05:00 AM | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
|
Quote:
(a) it looks like a very good service (b) every day +2 means that it's well regulated (c) a regulation (after a service) of a few + s/d confirms what I observe too |
|
20 October 2020, 05:48 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: The South, USA
Posts: 991
|
I prefer a slight positive bias and every Rolex I've dealt with has been that way. My Daytona-C was last hacked to WWVB on 9/11 and in the 37 days since is now 13 seconds ahead, or .35 seconds per day. I'm pretty darn happy with that.
That level of accuracy is as good as most non-high-end quartz movements. I have a Seiko Solar diver that gains .33 seconds per day no matter how much or how little I wear it. Warm or cool, doesn't seem to matter. I have a Breitling Chronomat, the first one released with the B1 movement and it always lost time, even after two services (one under warranty). Drove me to Rolex it did. |
20 October 2020, 06:05 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 159
|
Maybe you should sell it.
|
20 October 2020, 05:59 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Simon
Location: Wales
Watch: whichever I wear
Posts: 830
|
__________________
Timing Is Everything Submariner 114060/ Submariner 116613LB/ Daytona 116523/ Omega Seamaster/ Omega De Ville |
20 October 2020, 06:29 AM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,695
|
It's behaving well; consistency is the best results!!! That amounts to a minute per month variance!!!
|
20 October 2020, 09:49 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 515
|
Rolex is engineered for consistent accuracy. You’re paying the premium for it. +/- 10s a day is out of the question. You have a five year warranty that covers adjustments to within +/- 1 minute a month. If your ok with worse then that type of performance out of your mechanical watch, buy a Tag and save some money.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.