The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 January 2021, 09:33 AM   #31
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefishtaco View Post
It's not 1945 last I checked... 39mm is the smallest I'll go so that it doesn't get confused for my wives timepiece.
My point was that the 36mm DJ has worked for many decades (not just in 1945), so I always wonder "What has changed?" nowadays. Wrist sizes haven't.

I understand some style changes through the years, like wide jacket lapels and wide ties, bell-bottoms, etc ... But a watch size is different, and is not tied to a specific fashion trend. The 36mm DJ seems timeless and classic, regardless of wrist size.

Still, to each their own. Definitely subjective.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 09:34 AM   #32
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,257
Sweet.
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 09:38 AM   #33
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post

Men's wrists aren't any bigger or smaller on average nowadays than they were in the 1940s, '50s, '60s, etc .... when the 36mm DJ was the quintessential Rolex. Not sure why some guys think it's too small today.
This. I have a fairly big wrist, and can easily pull off a 36 mm DJ. I even go down to 34 with those lovely old Tudors whose lugs make them wear big.
Attached Images
 
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 09:39 AM   #34
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefishtaco View Post
It's not 1945 last I checked... 39mm is the smallest I'll go so that it doesn't get confused for my wives timepiece.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 09:50 AM   #35
onefishtaco
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorningTundra View Post
I think the point is that it’s persisted 75 years and is still desirable and still looks sophisticated and understated. The jury’s still out on whether the dinner plate size is a good look or not. FWIW, I think it will go the way of square toed shoes.
41mm DJ has been in production for 12ish years going strong... it's in their new lineup too. Hasn't gone anywhere. Most other watches in their lineup moving to larger cases too... not a trend anymore but becoming the standard.
onefishtaco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 10:02 AM   #36
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefishtaco View Post
41mm DJ has been in production for 12ish years going strong... it's in their new lineup too. Hasn't gone anywhere. Most other watches in their lineup moving to larger cases too... not a trend anymore but becoming the standard.

12 years isn’t 75. That’s only as long as flared pants and paisley neck ties.
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 10:24 AM   #37
onefishtaco
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorningTundra View Post
12 years isn’t 75. That’s only as long as flared pants and paisley neck ties.
Fair enough, time will tell!

Don't get me wrong, I like 36mm for vintage watches but wouldn't buy a modern 36mm for my wrist and overall proportions... I need something more substantial, and it seems so do a lot of others.

One of my favorite references is the Datejust Thunderbird Turn-O-graph... but it just looks dainty on me, and I don't prefer that look.

onefishtaco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 11:33 AM   #38
Nickn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: London
Posts: 526
We are not talking about modern Rolex this is the vintage section
The original posters watch is very nice and I am sure he will enjoy wearing it
Nickn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 11:36 AM   #39
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickn View Post
We are not talking about modern Rolex this is the vintage section
The original posters watch is very nice and I am sure he will enjoy wearing it

I agree. A nice DJ at a reasonable price
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 11:54 AM   #40
GST15
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: USA
Watch: CHNR/YM/DJ/OP/SUB
Posts: 1,972
Great watch, best of luck. Love the vintage. I picked up this 1978 a few months ago and love it!
Name:  IMG_3741.jpeg
Views: 84
Size:  69.6 KB
GST15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 12:08 PM   #41
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
OP, if you don't have enough affirmative advice by now, I will add my voice to the choir saying that you've found a nice example of the classic silver dial 1601 (one of the more common variants) at a good price. If it appeals to you, you should buy it before someone else beats you to it. Don't dilly dally.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 12:11 PM   #42
MorningTundra
"TRF" Member
 
MorningTundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Morningtundra
Location: USA, UK & HKG
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by GST15 View Post

That’s gorgeous. These vintage TT pieces have a totally different character than the newer ones
MorningTundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 05:38 PM   #43
ancientmariner
"TRF" Member
 
ancientmariner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: UK
Posts: 1,174
OP, I think these classic 36mm DJs are great.

Have a 7.25" wrist and think size is perfect.

1603 from 1966
Attached Images
 
ancientmariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2021, 06:59 PM   #44
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
It's truly all in your head, whatever you believe is true for you. This is my 36mm 1600 on my 7.5 inch wrist, looks great to me. :)

Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2021, 02:28 AM   #45
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefishtaco View Post
41mm DJ has been in production for 12ish years going strong... it's in their new lineup too. Hasn't gone anywhere. Most other watches in their lineup moving to larger cases too... not a trend anymore but becoming the standard.
Yes, but the 36mm DJ hasn't gone anywhere either ... for 75 years. The 36mm DJ, vintage or modern, has the most DNA of any men's Rolex from the original. That just one reason I love it.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2021, 02:29 AM   #46
rolexest
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Canada
Watch: ya gunna do
Posts: 508
Very nice I much prefer these over the new Datejusts.
rolexest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2021, 04:34 AM   #47
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Yes, but the 36mm DJ hasn't gone anywhere either ... for 75 years. The 36mm DJ, vintage or modern, has the most DNA of any men's Rolex from the original. That just one reason I love it.
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2021, 04:35 AM   #48
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexest View Post
Very nice I much prefer these over the new Datejusts.
Me too.
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.