The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 January 2021, 03:55 AM   #31
Asumer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Colorado
Watch: 116500LN - BLK
Posts: 94
5 digit vs 6 digit is a valid dilemma. I think one has to look at the core use and naming of steel rolex sports models. The "sports" part in the name is key, you don't want a heavy metal watch when doing athletic or physical activities, I am a long distance runner and would never in a million years run with a 6 digit model, its just too heavy(garmin all the way!).

The 5 digit bracelet feels flimsy because its supposed to be light and is designed for sports like activities. That being said the 6 digits feel bank vault sturdy and engineered perfectly. They also have anti magnetic capabilities and anti shock resistantance. The ceramic bezels never fade but a drop from up high could shatter them.

Really I think it comes down to wrist size, a bias to or not towards more shiny features, weight preference and how much one values all the new techology of the 6 digits. Choose from those values and you can't go wrong. 5 or 6 digit refs are great watches that will last a few lifetimes and hold their value like no other watch brand.
Asumer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 06:33 AM   #32
sond86
"TRF" Member
 
sond86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Real Name: Gym Rat
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,327
Ya I feel that same way and only wear the older one a couple times month
sond86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 06:58 AM   #33
socialpro
"TRF" Member
 
socialpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Alex
Watch: Rolex || Panerai
Posts: 1,348
It's my favorite Rolex watch in the entire lineup (pepsi 16710), and very rare a day goes by when I don't daily it on my wrist. Few others make it into the rotation but this remains king.

socialpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 07:01 AM   #34
nachopc
2024 Pledge Member
 
nachopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Nash
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Only
Posts: 1,579
It’s absolutely a beautiful watch, if you follow that try a Paul Newman Daytona....Don’t want to spoil the surprise!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
nachopc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 09:45 AM   #35
Dsmith1974
"TRF" Member
 
Dsmith1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
Repeat after me.. five digits are not flimsy. Six digits are over engineered.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dsmith1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 12:08 PM   #36
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dsmith1974 View Post
Repeat after me.. five digits are not flimsy. Six digits are over engineered.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is kind of funny since in nearly any practical metal work, excess metal is milled away that does not contribute to the structural integrity of the final product. Because metal is heavy and excess weight is a bad thing usually (but not always, sometimes a specific weight is integral to proper functioning.) I'm trying to think of one other instance were superfluous metal is left on, without an increase in structural performance, and the increased weight is considered an engineering upgrade. As others have noted the the high wear points are not affected by the extra metal in the case or bracelet.
csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 01:19 PM   #37
huba01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,449
Have both, 16710 all the way for me
huba01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 01:27 PM   #38
mosanman
"TRF" Member
 
mosanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Dom
Location: London
Posts: 263
I'm the opposite, I have a BLRO but I started to find it slightly too bulky for my small wrist.
Recently picked up a coke, and I actually prefer how much lighter and smaller it wears, with the jubilee I actually forget it's on my wrist and that's how I prefer it.




Good luck with your search for the right GMT, both are great references!
mosanman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 02:08 PM   #39
copperjohn
"TRF" Member
 
copperjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: john
Location: San Antonio, TX
Watch: Exp
Posts: 469
I like the look of the 5 digit. Sociopaths looks really good. But seeing it in person, having it inspected, and being able to make sure the bracelet is comfortable would not be an easy thing to do when buying online. And over $11000 on secondary market? Eesh. I’m waiting for the 6 digit to become available at the AD (hahahahahaa..). But I’d consider the 5.
copperjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 02:34 PM   #40
YoyoGift8
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
YoyoGift8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: MNL/Henderson NV
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 976
I like everything about the 16710 reference except for the bracelet especially when you are used to wearing the 6 digits often.
YoyoGift8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 03:46 PM   #41
CFR
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by copperjohn View Post
I like the look of the 5 digit. Sociopaths looks really good. But seeing it in person, having it inspected, and being able to make sure the bracelet is comfortable would not be an easy thing to do when buying online. And over $11000 on secondary market? Eesh. I’m waiting for the 6 digit to become available at the AD (hahahahahaa..). But I’d consider the 5.
Please tell me this was autocorrect!
CFR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 03:49 PM   #42
rmurphy
2024 Pledge Member
 
rmurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: Augusta Georgia
Watch: 16600
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by mosanman View Post
I'm the opposite, I have a BLRO but I started to find it slightly too bulky for my small wrist.
Recently picked up a coke, and I actually prefer how much lighter and smaller it wears, with the jubilee I actually forget it's on my wrist and that's how I prefer it.

Good luck with your search for the right GMT, both are great references!
Your coke is stunning, I need to unload one of mine and get one ... it creates an emotional response every time I see one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rmurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 04:01 PM   #43
michaelodonnell123
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Michael
Location: NJ
Watch: Panerai 112
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaZCaL View Post
Is it crazy I’m thinking about getting myself a Tudor GMT for now while I wait for the BLRO. Tried it on the other day and liked it. They are not as refined as Rolex but definitely a great value IMO.
Go read the 'date wheel' threads before you plunk down your money.
michaelodonnell123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2021, 04:21 PM   #44
henrylee
"TRF" Member
 
henrylee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,223
I actually prefer modern (BLNR & rootbeer) more lately over my 5 digit Pepsi.
__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021
henrylee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2021, 12:13 AM   #45
HiBoost
"TRF" Member
 
HiBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,528
I've owned a 16710 and now a 126613 and they are very different experiences. The Sub never disappears, you are always conscious of it on the wrist. The 16710 just felt balanced and comfortable. Just like you aren't constantly aware of a well fitting pair of jeans. I imagine the newer GMT with its maxi case would be even more of a presence, which sounds like a good thing in your mind (and a bad thing in mine).

Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk
HiBoost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2021, 08:27 AM   #46
copperjohn
"TRF" Member
 
copperjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: john
Location: San Antonio, TX
Watch: Exp
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFR View Post
Please tell me this was autocorrect!
Oh ya, Siri... I double checked. It’s socialpro up above.
copperjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2021, 08:54 AM   #47
Alliy
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 141
I like the watch. Seems like a good watch to me.
Alliy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2021, 10:02 AM   #48
RaZCaL
"TRF" Member
 
RaZCaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: 116500,116610,VCO
Posts: 847
Quote:
Originally Posted by mosanman View Post
I'm the opposite, I have a BLRO but I started to find it slightly too bulky for my small wrist.
Recently picked up a coke, and I actually prefer how much lighter and smaller it wears, with the jubilee I actually forget it's on my wrist and that's how I prefer it.




Good luck with your search for the right GMT, both are great references!
Man....that Coke is beautiful! Contemplating again....
RaZCaL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2021, 01:44 PM   #49
ddaly12
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Cranford
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by mosanman View Post
I'm the opposite, I have a BLRO but I started to find it slightly too bulky for my small wrist.
Recently picked up a coke, and I actually prefer how much lighter and smaller it wears, with the jubilee I actually forget it's on my wrist and that's how I prefer it.




Good luck with your search for the right GMT, both are great references!

That coke is CRISP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ddaly12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2021, 06:02 PM   #50
28mm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaZCaL View Post
Perhaps the word “substantial” is the wrong term. It just felt small and light on my wrist. I prefer a bit of weight on my wrist that’s all. The reference is beautiful though. Nothing against the 16710.
I find it hard to really 'know' what I think without having time with it..

I appreciate my 16710 for exactly the reasons you are not bonding with it.

I can tell you that of all my watches, by far I get the most compliments on the Pepsi. I'm sure it's partly a matter age but while I have a new BLRO on indefinite 'order', for me, it's flashier and showy and I'm much more comfortable with the low key 16710.

I got a 124060 today, feels a little bit sleeker than my 114060, so I am not all about the 5 digits.

To each their own of course.

Your search continues!
__________________
126610LV • 16613 • 116710LN • 16710 116713 • 126710BLNR • 116520 • 16570 • 214270 • 16622 • 116400V • 124300 • 114300 * 116334 • 116519LN • 126720VTNR
28mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2021, 06:11 PM   #51
28mm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,318
Love that Coke w jubilee..

Want!

I have to stop buying watches..
__________________
126610LV • 16613 • 116710LN • 16710 116713 • 126710BLNR • 116520 • 16570 • 214270 • 16622 • 116400V • 124300 • 114300 * 116334 • 116519LN • 126720VTNR
28mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.