The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 3 March 2021, 09:00 AM   #1
jamestucker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: England
Posts: 578
Emma Donaldson was the Rolex manager at Liverpool Goldsmiths and she no longer holds that position. May be a coincidence.
jamestucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2021, 10:28 AM   #2
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,588
I feel privileged to be among such an altruistic group of watch enthusiasts who would never try to sell something for what ir was worth instead of 50% of that because someone in Switzerland says they should.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
zengineer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2021, 10:52 AM   #3
Rolexforthewin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Far far away!
Posts: 335
I can tell you that when I went to pick up my Rolex last week, my sales rep stated there was 25 people ahead of me, for what its worth.
Rolexforthewin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2021, 11:16 AM   #4
clickingdru
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 169
This isn't the full story yeah?
clickingdru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2021, 06:33 PM   #5
Sandpit
"TRF" Member
 
Sandpit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,808
I'm not sure if its the same store that I'm thinking of, but I have heard of a particular store where this has happened - also in the North West of England.
Sandpit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2021, 01:40 AM   #6
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
What’s so sacred about these lists? We’re not talking about organ donors or COVID vaccines? Luxury watches!!! Not getting one doesn’t prevent you from keeping the time. The lists are fabricated, often phantom, devised by the AD based on purely subjective assessments of their customers and availability of stock (over which they have little control)
Rolex wants no part in managing the personnel of their AD’s, nor do they want to get involved in retail sales, it’s a headache.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2021, 05:06 AM   #7
Rolexatlast
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack T View Post
What’s so sacred about these lists? We’re not talking about organ donors or COVID vaccines? Luxury watches!!! Not getting one doesn’t prevent you from keeping the time. The lists are fabricated, often phantom, devised by the AD based on purely subjective assessments of their customers and availability of stock (over which they have little control)
Rolex wants no part in managing the personnel of their AD’s, nor do they want to get involved in retail sales, it’s a headache.
Depends on whether the Manager was taking backhanders. In the UK, bribery is illegal, and a serious criminal and legal matter for both individual and their employer
Rolexatlast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2021, 07:01 PM   #8
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexatlast View Post
Depends on whether the Manager was taking backhanders. In the UK, bribery is illegal, and a serious criminal and legal matter for both individual and their employer
You are a client, I want your business, I fly you to Vegas and take you to lunch, is that a bribe, a backhander?

Are the owners of Rolex AD’s happy with their discount given the $$’s to be made in the current Rolex bonanza?

I have been in sales for nearly 50 years and if this situation happened with one of my agencies serious questions would be asked.

But do I want to keep the agency or play the game?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2021, 11:51 PM   #9
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexatlast View Post
Depends on whether the Manager was taking backhanders. In the UK, bribery is illegal, and a serious criminal and legal matter for both individual and their employer
One can say paying the manager directly, personally for preferential treatment is bribery; however it is, in effect, no different than being told officially one must spend, spend, spend on jewelry, other watches and accessories to be considered for a high demand watch.

One is condoned, the other is punished. In each case, it’s all so someone can put a very expensive watch on their wrist. There are more important things to worry about.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2021, 01:59 AM   #10
Cambo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cam
Location: North of 49th
Watch: Rolex/Grand Seiko
Posts: 1,934
Really depends on the policy/instructions of the AD owner. I own a business and if I caught any of my employees (Manager or not) taking gifts (bribes) or giving preferential treatment to someone without my expressed permission they would be out on their ear.

All IMHO
__________________
16618 126710BLRO 116500 LN (White) 228235 228239
SBGK002
Cambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2021, 05:39 AM   #11
Matty99365
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: England
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 232
Which AD was it?
Matty99365 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2021, 12:20 PM   #12
jamestucker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: England
Posts: 578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty99365 View Post
Which AD was it?
Emma Donaldson was the Rolex manager at Liverpool Goldsmiths and she no longer holds that position. May be a coincidence.
jamestucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2021, 07:06 PM   #13
RDT-G23
"TRF" Member
 
RDT-G23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 332
The word “sacked’...you Brits...
RDT-G23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2021, 09:43 PM   #14
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,676
Sacked for reorganising a list? LOL!

Rolex policy? ROFRLMAO!

This is the luxury retail sector.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2021, 02:13 AM   #15
VonSomething
"TRF" Member
 
VonSomething's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Europe
Posts: 821
I don't think this classifies as a "bribe".

Bribery is defined by Black's Law Dictionary as the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any item of value to influence the actions of an official, or other person, in charge of a public or legal duty.
VonSomething is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2021, 02:52 AM   #16
dtwer
"TRF" Member
 
dtwer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: midwest
Watch: DJ 41
Posts: 1,507
Quote:
Originally Posted by VonSomething View Post
I don't think this classifies as a "bribe".

Bribery is defined by Black's Law Dictionary as the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any item of value to influence the actions of an official, or other person, in charge of a public or legal duty.
This exactly. I lol whenever people throw around words that they have no understanding.
dtwer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2021, 03:06 AM   #17
Cambo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cam
Location: North of 49th
Watch: Rolex/Grand Seiko
Posts: 1,934
I LOL when people feel compelled to quote dictionaries while completely missing the point or context of someone's statement(s) on a forum site.
__________________
16618 126710BLRO 116500 LN (White) 228235 228239
SBGK002
Cambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2021, 04:31 AM   #18
Rolexatlast
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtwer View Post
This exactly. I lol whenever people throw around words that they have no understanding.
and I love it when arrogance betrays ignorance

Am open to your apologies
Rolexatlast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2021, 08:08 AM   #19
Cambo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cam
Location: North of 49th
Watch: Rolex/Grand Seiko
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexatlast View Post
and I love it when arrogance betrays ignorance

Am open to your apologies
__________________
16618 126710BLRO 116500 LN (White) 228235 228239
SBGK002
Cambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2021, 08:24 AM   #20
MiDoon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexatlast View Post
and I love it when arrogance betrays ignorance

Am open to your apologies
I can go to Facebook to find this kind of dialogue. Just sayin...
MiDoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2021, 07:44 AM   #21
Rolexatlast
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
The Bribery Act 2010
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga...0100023_en.pdf

Section 1 states:
Section 1 makes it an offence for a person (‘P’) to offer, promise or give a financial or other advantage to another person in one of two cases:
• Case 1 applies where P intends the advantage to bring about the improper performance by another person of
a relevant function or activity or to reward such improper performance.
• Case 2 applies where P knows or believes that the acceptance of the advantage offered, promised or given in itself constitutes the improper performance of a relevant function or activity.
18 ‘Improper performance’ is defined at sections 3, 4 and 5. In summary, this means performance which amounts to
a breach of an expectation that a person will act in good faith, impartially, or in accordance with a position of trust. The offence applies to bribery relating to any function of a public nature, connected with a business, performed in the course of a person’s employment or performed on behalf of a company or another body of persons.
Therefore, bribery in both the public and private sectors is covered.


For the purposes of deciding whether a function or activity has been performed improperly the test of what is expected is a test of what a reasonable person in the UK would expect in relation to the performance of that function or activity

https://assets.publishing.service.go...0-guidance.pdf
See page 11

Section7 states that commercial organisations which fail to prevent persons associated with them from bribing another person on their behalf are committing an offence



Therefore if a reasonable person says that taking cash backhanders to give preferential treatment is improper, then that is bribery. If the company fails to stop it, then they are also committing an offence.

The real world difference (cynical view) to asking customers to buy additional jewellery in order to be bumped up the list, is that this would give the employer more profit, whereas a backhander benefits the employee
Rolexatlast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2021, 01:32 PM   #22
Polar Bear
"TRF" Member
 
Polar Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Australia
Watch: Panerai PAM687
Posts: 762
Is there really much difference between buying so much Jewelry that your AD makes $10k in margins/commission and just giving your AD $10k in cash up front?
Polar Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2021, 09:17 AM   #23
Sweetswisssteel
"TRF" Member
 
Sweetswisssteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Brisbane
Watch: 126618LB
Posts: 588
Would only be sacked if he was somehow harming the business. Might have just been a bad manager.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Sweetswisssteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2021, 12:02 PM   #24
JDsnewwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: JD
Location: NJ
Watch: 116710LN with BCL
Posts: 430
In the US you can't take a bribe. This is why they force you to spend money on useless knickknacks that are gathering dust around the shop that no one wants. If you collect a bribe, there is no tax to be collected. If you purchase c&%p diamonds, well, that's taxable so the government will look the other way.

Selling out the back door to the grey market is happening all over the place in the US. It breaks Rolex policy and I would venture to guess that the ADs arent declaring the sales on their taxes. This is where the downfall will happen.

Plenty of watches are available with none of the drama from the gray market. Just walk out of the ADs. Market saturation is a reality. (Piaget in the 1980s?) (Omega.. all the time). If you want the watch, buy the watch. Let the ADs choke on their own vomit.
JDsnewwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.