No date sub - what do you think?

[arcampado]

I love my no date Sub. Much cleaner looking without the date cyclops.

[Greenwood_]

From my point of view; what the sub date loses in aesthetics, it makes up for in functionality.

Both great watches.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by GB-man

It’s only the best watch ever made lol you’re good to go.

Have to agree



Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

[bob sims]

Originally Posted by JDelage

I'm curious what people think of the no date sub (compared to the date sub, obviously)? As a diving tool watch, it makes a lot of sense not to have a date on the dial. Esthetically speaking, not having a date window makes for a super clean dial and possibly better visibility at night.

How is the no date sub considered in the Rolex line up? Ugly duckling or just as popular as the rest?

(Personally, I also find date complications early fairly useless generally...)

I think it SUCKS.
Save up for a bluesy, TT sky dweller or TT datejust.

[Skaramanga]

Originally Posted by majidessa

The Sub ND is the most perfect watch in Rolex line up

I agree with you!

[infinity0001]

The date is most actually i think..

[Dougiebaby]

Originally Posted by JDelage

I'm curious what people think of the no date sub (compared to the date sub, obviously)? As a diving tool watch, it makes a lot of sense not to have a date on the dial. Esthetically speaking, not having a date window makes for a super clean dial and possibly better visibility at night.

How is the no date sub considered in the Rolex line up? Ugly duckling or just as popular as the rest?

(Personally, I also find date complications early fairly useless generally...)

If I could have received my Sub without the date ... I would love it even more!

I do much prefer the ND version, however, Rolex does not offer the LV in ND. I asked my AD for either ND or LV. And they offered the LV, so that made my decision.

But in a perfect world, I do wish the LV was ND.







Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Ensign]

For modern ceramic Subs, I prefer the date version. The cases are so chunky that I feel like it should come with at least a date complication and cyclops.

Now the pre ceramics look better in the no date version. Those thinner cases are so elegant and wearable.

[travisb]

One of the nicest watches they make in my opinion.

[Vetracer]

I have both varieties. The Submariner is nicely balanced without the date. It’s my preference.

[domi1]

The best!

[domi1]

Originally Posted by skaramanga

i agree with you!

x2 🍻

[Nairn1980]

Originally Posted by majidessa

The Sub ND is the most perfect watch in Rolex line up

This could be true

[domi1]

Originally Posted by Kyle3130

I think the Submariner is THE Submariner and the Submariner Date is a Submariner Date.

[ogbeans]

Idc what anyone says….I need the date, I use it daily , and they cyclops is soooo iconic

[RBradleigh]

I went ND but now I’d be just as cool with the Date. I do find myself using my phone and or PC taskbar for the date every now and then. But I do prefer the look of the ND. If it were my only watch I’d go Date.

I guess… can’t go wrong with either and in both markets the ND should save ya a grand or two and personally I would pay 0 extra for a green bezel


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Santiago32]

For a sub I prefer a date.
For a no date I prefer a BB58.

[copperjohn]

I’ll preface this with “as a recent retiree” I love my Exp1. The no date is great as a grab and go watch. If I didn’t already have a Sub date, I might’ve chose the no date option instead.

[Gerry62]

my first Sub was a 14060
I then got 5513 beautiful
then 116613 TT
today I appreciate the cyclope (126603 TT 166610 but also 16600)
there is no better and no worse ..... every Submariner / SD is the best

[shammad10]

Love the submariner. But for me, the pre-ceramic models are the best. They’re the purest and I love the tool feel about them. The 116610 and 126610 (and no date versions) are just too clinical for me.

[Dougiebaby]

Originally Posted by RBradleigh

…personally I would pay 0 extra for a green bezel


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is funny is that I paid $550 LESS than the black bezel Sub date (now at $10,100) for my green bezel 126610LV when I purchased it on December 10, 2021 for $9,550. Thank you Rolex price increase!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[GradyPhilpott]

Originally Posted by Kyle3130

I think the Submariner is THE Submariner and the Submariner Date is a Submariner Date.

I got one of the last NIB 14060M models in the United States in December 2011, before the 114060 was introduced at Basil 2012.

I like the new Subs, but the 14060M is my favorite of all the Subs.

[Yzord]

Its simple though. A Submariner is the classic divers watch around. And when you dive you basically want to know one thing...and thats the time. A date is not relevant when you are diving, because you come out of the water the same day, so.

So the Submariner ND is the watch which earns the title as the divers watch. Thats why its called Submariner.

[Harry-57]

Originally Posted by Kyle3130

I think the Submariner is THE Submariner and the Submariner Date is a Submariner Date.

Agreed. There's only one Submariner. An icon. You can also get a version with a date complication, but it's not the original. I prefer the Sub date. Each to our own.

[WilsdorfNDavis]

Can't go wrong with either one!

But I split the difference and went with the 116600 SD4K

:-)

[subprimero]

I prefer the Sub to the Sub Date. I would go for a Sea-Dweller without a cyclops if I wanted a Rolex diver with a date complication.

[ikincooper]

Originally Posted by WilsdorfNDavis

Can't go wrong with either one!

But I split the difference and went with the 116600 SD4K

:-)

Same for me.

My first Rolex was a Sub (ND) and I went with it over the date version for its symmetry. Despite the date on my SD4K, I find that the bezel gives it even more symmetry and I also prefer the slimmer lugs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Nairn1980]

Originally Posted by JDelage

I'm curious what people think of the no date sub (compared to the date sub, obviously)? As a diving tool watch, it makes a lot of sense not to have a date on the dial. Esthetically speaking, not having a date window makes for a super clean dial and possibly better visibility at night.

How is the no date sub considered in the Rolex line up? Ugly duckling or just as popular as the rest?

(Personally, I also find date complications early fairly useless generally...)

Original submariner (nd) is the purists choice.

People go on about having a date, but I look at the date once in the morning and remember it all day (and honestly, I don’t have the best memory)

You can’t go wrong with either watch, but definitely don’t dismiss the classic sub.

[WILLIWALKER]

Originally Posted by Kyle3130

I think the Submariner is THE Submariner and the Submariner Date is a Submariner Date.

Although I appreciate the date, i agree !!

THE sub is the 5513, 14060, 114060, 124060 !
The others are the sub date.

[B.F. Pigeon]

I think the Submariner is a fantastic watch. To me it is just perfect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk