ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mustangbrad · 7 September 2009, 12:52 PM

I wish I had a sub. I am still looking.

icnbne · 7 September 2009, 04:21 PM

16610!

Sub · 12 September 2009, 02:21 PM

Submariner......best all rounder watch!

love it , love it, love it...

Cheers!

Asad · 12 September 2009, 02:34 PM

Sub!

culto · 13 September 2009, 06:00 AM

The Deep Sea is beautiful but I do not have the wrist to pull it off.

DM101 · 13 September 2009, 05:22 PM

SUB

Rollie Fingers · 12 August 2012, 10:00 PM

SubC for me

Patrick81 · 13 September 2009, 11:18 PM

Is the price diff between the two watches very big? How many K diff?

SirLoki · 15 September 2009, 03:11 AM

deep sea for me :)

joeychitwood · 29 October 2009, 03:36 AM

The Submariner. I don't like the gaudy lettering on the inner ring (I don't know the formal name of the part) between the crystal and the dial on the DeepSea.

1000ftSub · 29 October 2009, 06:56 AM

I say Deepsea, but you can't go wrong with ether one.

anipit · 30 October 2009, 09:46 PM

Submariner with date, it is thinier, you can look at the date without a microscope, and it is safer because suggests you to stop your diving at 300 meters!!!!!

Ultraman · 30 October 2009, 10:33 PM

The Sub!

NYC6 · 3 November 2009, 06:13 AM

While shopping for a new Sub a couple months ago I tried on a DeepSea. Its an impressive piece to be sure but damn its Ginormous! It seemed to big and seemed like it was screaming "Look at me". If I had wrists the size of Andre the Giant it would look in scale but I dont so I purchased a Sub ND.

Antonis · 31 October 2009, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anipit

Submariner with date, it is thinier, you can look at the date without a microscope, and it is safer because suggests you to stop your diving at 300 meters!!!!!

very clever Laura!

sushisummo · 11 November 2009, 04:49 AM

Deep.

Bumin Khan · 11 November 2009, 05:14 AM

Deepsea

gazp · 27 November 2009, 08:40 AM

sub sub sub

keygold · 27 November 2009, 09:33 AM

I prefer the DeepSea

Nicko · 27 November 2009, 10:02 AM

I mean really, how many times has this poll been done? Please search and see for yourself. Vote, vote, vote....Come on now, geeshhhhh!

ogschile · 22 March 2010, 04:57 AM

DeepSea of course, that is the best, of course you need a wrist in accord

sea-dweller · 22 March 2010, 12:05 PM

Sub, the DSSD is too big for my wrists...

kuchigalore · 22 March 2010, 01:57 PM

Deepsea bc I own it but the new Sub looks killer too!

blackmsport · 22 March 2010, 02:52 PM

Sub... as Deep Sea is a bit bulky

Sub is sleek and classical

AAMD11 · 22 March 2010, 03:56 PM

Sub for sure the SD is just too excessive.

Connoisseur · 23 March 2010, 05:48 AM

I love my DSSD but it's not an everyday watch. That's OK with me because I rotate it with 8 other watches, rocking the DSSD on weekends mainly. For someone with a smaller collection of maybe 1-3 watches that needs that core watch with everyday versatility, I'd go sub all the way. Especially with the new ceramic bezel subs. Love em.

Ceb · 23 March 2010, 07:44 AM

The Sub, cause I just ordered one!!

jamesp7890 · 13 July 2012, 05:52 AM

Man!! I have a submariner , but this just makes me want a deep sa sooo bad

jamesp7890 · 13 July 2012, 05:52 AM

It's so much bigger and more contemporary

h999r · 13 July 2012, 11:57 AM

Deepsea = Sub in steroid .. for bigger wrist hand looks much better with deespsea, for smaller sub.

View Poll Results: Submariner or DeepSea?
Rolex Submariner	410	57.50%
Rolex DeepSea	303	42.50%
Voters: 713. You may not vote on this poll

12 September 2009, 02:34 PM	#4
Asad "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Stillwater, OK Posts: 96	Sub! __________________ Have: Omega Speedmaster Had:Too Many to List; Panerai's, IWC's Omega's, Tag Heuer's and Breitling's.

12 August 2012, 10:00 PM	#7
Rollie Fingers "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Jimmy Location: Sydney Watch: yatalkinboutwillis Posts: 173	SubC for me Attached Images

30 October 2009, 09:46 PM	#12
anipit "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Laura Location: Italy Watch: 16610 + 16220 Posts: 385	Submariner with date, it is thinier, you can look at the date without a microscope, and it is safer because suggests you to stop your diving at 300 meters!!!!! __________________ Laura from Italy. 16610 + 16220.

11 November 2009, 04:49 AM	#16
sushisummo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: JT Location: in a house....:) Watch: Hmmm......? Posts: 1,776	Deep. __________________ Collections: -- R-O-L-E-X --AP-ROO -- P-A-N-E-R-A-I -- B-R-E-G-U-E-T -- I-W-C -- B-A-L-L -- O-T-H-E-R-S WISHLIST: Too many to list...... Member #23367

7 September 2009, 12:52 PM	#1
mustangbrad Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: brad Location: il Watch: 16613 Posts: 286	I wish I had a sub. I am still looking.

7 September 2009, 04:21 PM	#2
icnbne "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: J Location: Brisbane Watch: Rolex Omega Seiko Posts: 1,562	16610!

12 September 2009, 02:21 PM	#3
Sub Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Houston Watch: Submariner, GMTIIc Posts: 53	Submariner......best all rounder watch! love it , love it, love it... Cheers!

13 September 2009, 06:00 AM	#5
culto "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: new york Posts: 260	The Deep Sea is beautiful but I do not have the wrist to pull it off.

13 September 2009, 05:22 PM	#6
DM101 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Singapore Posts: 901	SUB

13 September 2009, 11:18 PM	#8
Patrick81 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 9	Is the price diff between the two watches very big? How many K diff?

29 October 2009, 03:36 AM	#10
joeychitwood "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Way Up North USA Watch: Rolexes & Tudors Posts: 6,361	The Submariner. I don't like the gaudy lettering on the inner ring (I don't know the formal name of the part) between the crystal and the dial on the DeepSea.

29 October 2009, 06:56 AM	#11
1000ftSub "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Orlando Posts: 2,471	I say Deepsea, but you can't go wrong with ether one.

30 October 2009, 10:33 PM	#13
Ultraman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Australia Posts: 2,175	The Sub!

3 November 2009, 06:13 AM	#14
NYC6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Dennis Location: L.I./N.Y. Watch: SUBMARINER 14060M Posts: 2,769	While shopping for a new Sub a couple months ago I tried on a DeepSea. Its an impressive piece to be sure but damn its Ginormous! It seemed to big and seemed like it was screaming "Look at me". If I had wrists the size of Andre the Giant it would look in scale but I dont so I purchased a Sub ND.

11 November 2009, 05:14 AM	#17
Bumin Khan Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Europe Watch: DeepSea Posts: 27	Deepsea

27 November 2009, 08:40 AM	#18
gazp "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: gary Location: uk newcastle Watch: SS Ceramic Sub Posts: 504	sub sub sub

27 November 2009, 09:33 AM	#19
keygold Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Surrey Posts: 21	I prefer the DeepSea

27 November 2009, 10:02 AM	#20
Nicko Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Not here anymore Posts: 4,787	I mean really, how many times has this poll been done? Please search and see for yourself. Vote, vote, vote....Come on now, geeshhhhh!

22 March 2010, 04:57 AM	#21
ogschile "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Chile Posts: 1	DeepSea of course, that is the best, of course you need a wrist in accord

22 March 2010, 12:05 PM	#22
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Sub, the DSSD is too big for my wrists... __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

22 March 2010, 01:57 PM	#23
kuchigalore "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: chicago Posts: 3	Deepsea bc I own it but the new Sub looks killer too!

22 March 2010, 02:52 PM	#24
blackmsport Banned Join Date: May 2009 Location: Melb - Australia Posts: 2,959	Sub... as Deep Sea is a bit bulky Sub is sleek and classical

22 March 2010, 03:56 PM	#25
AAMD11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Illusive Man Location: NYC Watch: Omega Worldtimer Posts: 670	Sub for sure the SD is just too excessive.

23 March 2010, 05:48 AM	#26
Connoisseur "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: MD Watch: Rolex & PAM Posts: 204	I love my DSSD but it's not an everyday watch. That's OK with me because I rotate it with 8 other watches, rocking the DSSD on weekends mainly. For someone with a smaller collection of maybe 1-3 watches that needs that core watch with everyday versatility, I'd go sub all the way. Especially with the new ceramic bezel subs. Love em. __________________ 218238 Day Date II, 11661OV Hulk, 116520 SS WD Daytona, 116660 DSSD, TT Datejust, PAM 233, 232, 505, Breitling Montbrillant Olympus, Bentley GT wife's: 178384 SS Datejust WMOP/Diamond dial, 179171 TT RG Datejust, PAM 49

23 March 2010, 07:44 AM	#27
Ceb "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: UK Watch: SD, Sub's & GMT's Posts: 159	The Sub, cause I just ordered one!!

13 July 2012, 05:52 AM	#28
jamesp7890 Banned Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: James Location: dallas Watch: Sub-c Posts: 78	Man!! I have a submariner , but this just makes me want a deep sa sooo bad

13 July 2012, 11:57 AM	#30
h999r Banned Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: HR Location: Planet Earth Watch: -ing Barts. Posts: 4,244	Deepsea = Sub in steroid .. for bigger wrist hand looks much better with deespsea, for smaller sub.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode