Rolex 3135 versus 3235

[alphadweller]

I own one 3135 and two 3235s. The 3135 runs flawlessly, one 3235 is ok, the other 3235 has low amplitude (below 200º in all vertical positions after 24h) and shows poor time keeping (-6 s/d on average after a full wind).

If given the choice of movement for an otherwise similar looking watch, I'd go for the 3135. If the model I want only exists with the 3235, then I’d still get it but would manage my expectations accordingly (potential sub-par performance and shorter service intervals).

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by IsaaH

Just thought I'd ask and see what everyone's thoughts are comparing the predecessor of the 3235, the 3135 movement. Seems like the 3135's were a true workhorse of Rolex's lineup (as was the even-earlier 3035s).

Judging from the discussions regarding the 3235, it would seem the older movements seem in general to have better track records when it comes to reliability. Perhaps some of these issues re. low amplitude will be ironed out in the future, or perhaps not.

If given the option today for a brand new Rolex w/ either movement, would you opt for the 3135 or the 3235? Would love to hear your thoughts and opinions.

To answer your question.
I will opt for a balance of accuracy and well proven reliability.
Therefore it can only be a 3135 for me despite it's main inherent flaw, over a 3235 as things currently stand.
Like many respondents there are a number of current watches that I would jump on in a heartbeat, but that movement lurking inside is the biggest turn off.

3135 rules

[Gearjockey]

A week ago as I was dining on vacation, I received a call from an AD for a 126610LN Sub-date. I politely declined. Once I believe Rolex has satisfactorily addressed the 32xx movement issues, I will be interested in acquiring a newer model again. Until then, It’s 31xx for me.

[1William]

I guess we can add the 32xx movement discussion to the topics that never seem to get put aside. The latest that is still going is case size, with an army of small case fans jumping on the band wagon at every new release or review of a model. I will say my selection has nothing to do with the movement and everything to do with look and fit from Rolex. The 31xx and the 32xx both work for me and it is about the watch. Accuracy that is only a few seconds off will not move me and the reported issues with the 32xx have not impacted me. So, buy what you like and will wear.

[Robf52]

Originally Posted by 1William

I guess we can add the 32xx movement discussion to the topics that never seem to get put aside. The latest that is still going is case size, with an army of small case fans jumping on the band wagon at every new release or review of a model. I will say my selection has nothing to do with the movement and everything to do with look and fit from Rolex. The 31xx and the 32xx both work for me and it is about the watch. Accuracy that is only a few seconds off will not move me and the reported issues with the 32xx have not impacted me. So, buy what you like and will wear.

This.

[Calatrava r]

I said we would start all over again. LOL

[saxo3]

Best posts …

Originally Posted by Easy E

Just a guess, but here’s how this thread plays out
Some of this
Followed by then several
Then a tremendous amount of this
The end

Originally Posted by SearChart

Pls no

[worldofoyster]

the 3135 is robust and has a good track record

[SOG DIVER]

At this point, I think I will retain my 1960 gilt 5512 Submariner with a COSC 1560
caliber engine.

Also, to get a balanced perspective, I asked two CW 21 Rolex watchmakers their opinion.
One of them stated that the metals used on Rolex watch movement parts was superior in the earlier calibers. That could start with the 15xx caliber family. They did seem to slightly favor the 31XX caliber family over the 32xx, with the caveat to officially remain neutral since the 32XX brought repairs to their door.

Started with a 1575 and have been more vintage for 50 years in the tool watch era.
The 3130/14060M is somewhat a fascinating reference.
Until all this is thrashed out, will have to agree with most of Peter's conclusions.
Without drilled lugs, the watch would be unacceptable regardless of its caliber.

[amh]

Anyone asking these questions should delete themselves from all ADS wish-lists immediately. (Then we'll have less posts like "Was offered a GMT/Sub but declined because it's 32xx. No 32xx for me!")

[Mystro]

Originally Posted by amh

Anyone asking these questions should delete themselves from all ADS wish-lists immediately. (Then we'll have less posts like "Was offered a GMT/Sub but declined because it's 32xx. No 32xx for me!")

[Tools]

Originally Posted by IsaaH

. . .

If given the option today for a brand new Rolex w/ either movement, would you opt for the 3135 or the 3235? Would love to hear your thoughts and opinions.

Kind of a nonsense question since you are only going to get the latest movement with a new watch.

The 32xx doesn't have any more bugs than any other new movement brought out, it just has the Internet to sensationalize it all.

When the 30xx movements first came out there was a notable journalist who criticized it heavily because "it didn't have hand finishing and there was grit in the case". That article stilll makes the rounds now, as an indictment of all Rolex movements compared to "high end" quality.

[Chewbacca]

Disgruntled Rolex owners with the 32xx are taking matters into their own hands. Rolex needs to fix this!

[EaglePilot]

oh God, no....this kind of post again ....