ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 October 2024, 10:21 AM | #31 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
|
41 & 21 is the golden size and proportion.
You can't argue with the judge....
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
19 October 2024, 10:36 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 243
|
|
19 October 2024, 10:49 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: PNW
Posts: 139
|
Reliability. 32xx series seems to be not only require substantially early service (repair? part replacement?) but new models still seem to demonstrate very inconsistent and occasionally poor readings on timeographers. I have hope they will magically fix this with a million movements being cranked out year after year, but I am starting to think a 33xx based off a newer Tudor movement may be the only real "fix".
|
19 October 2024, 10:51 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: PNW
Posts: 139
|
Clasp length seems to be the same between 11 and 12. I think it is a visual thing because of increased width and slimmed lugs together making the clasp seem substantially bigger.
Side note for those with small wrists: The 11 series has only 3 non-removable links on each side while the 12 has 3 on 6 oclock and 4 on 12 oclock. |
19 October 2024, 10:51 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 871
|
I will jump on every single 12 v 11 thread I see on TRF to say 11 is my all time favorite.
It’s unique and that makes me appreciate it very much! No mistaking it for an Invicta Pro Diver. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 October 2024, 11:00 AM | #36 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,091
|
|
19 October 2024, 11:02 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 243
|
|
19 October 2024, 11:26 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,106
|
It’s really splitting hairs between the two as it’s literally a matter of 1-2mm here or there.
I prefer the 11. The 12 is just as chunky overall with an even wider bracelet and clasp. The lugs were only thinned by hollowing out the insides more and adding a wider bracelet. The overall width is no slimmer and the case is slightly larger. I would get a 5 digit if I wanted a slimmer case and profile but there’s nothing wrong with the 12. It’s a matter of preference.. |
19 October 2024, 11:49 AM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hillside
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
|
|
19 October 2024, 12:39 PM | #40 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Plankton
Location: US
Watch: less
Posts: 4,161
|
|
19 October 2024, 12:56 PM | #41 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,091
|
|
19 October 2024, 01:16 PM | #42 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,212
|
Quote:
The lugs on the 12XXXX are about 1.1mm thinner when measured across the outer edges of the lugs, plus the 1mm thinner when measured across the inner lugs. Credit: Crown & Caliber at https://youtu.be/C6rJ0qfcgeg?si=aWeYRIyFZAJ_rqhi |
|
19 October 2024, 02:13 PM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,078
|
|
19 October 2024, 02:24 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: PNW
Posts: 139
|
|
19 October 2024, 03:47 PM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Switzerland
Watch: yourself
Posts: 1,302
|
Quote:
Agreed with the taper. I wish it was more tight at the end, like the 11 series. This one feels more like the other brands taper which seems like they couldn’t commit to straight or taper and went midway. My real issue with 12x and ceramic subs in general is the back case, which makes the watch float above the wrist. My 126710GRNR doesn’t do that and sits way more flush on the wrist. Because of how similar they can look, I’m thinking about letting the sub go. |
|
19 October 2024, 05:13 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 455
|
The 124060 is perfect. Way better than the 114060.
This of course is very subjective. I also had the 14060M. This is the best submariner. Yet. ;) P.S. Yes, the clasp could be a bit shorter for my taste, but I love the Glidelock |
19 October 2024, 10:52 PM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,669
|
Quote:
|
|
19 October 2024, 11:22 PM | #48 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,670
|
Quote:
It's not moaning, it's a discussion of differences of opinion and perception. My perfection point is the 116610LV. I don't particularly like the 1 series or the 12 series. I don't care or judge others by what they like, dislike, choose to spend their money on, or their willingness to discuss it in a discussion forum. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.