ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Eulogy · 10 May 2012, 02:37 AM

Maybe if I did something like that to my Sub D I could muffle my desire for a SeaDweller. At least for awhile...

Hesh · 10 May 2012, 03:14 AM

Would love to see how the 42EII 216570 looks without the cyclops!

joesephcho · 10 May 2012, 03:28 AM

With or without, still looks great!

AWS · 10 May 2012, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jolu

Here are a few (black, white, with cyclop and without):

http://s91.photobucket.com/albums/k3...es/ExplorerII/

Jolu, your pictures are always amazing. Thanks for sharing!

Linzjnr · 10 May 2012, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

As a fan of the iconic cyclops can't say I like that. However, since I'm a true believer in wearing what you want, how you want, if it frosts your flakes then go for it!
dP

I'm with Dan, it's something that makes a Rolex stand apart from others, iconic indeed.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10 May 2012, 02:37 AM	#61
Eulogy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: Mark Location: Florida Watch: 1803 and 16610 Posts: 170	Maybe if I did something like that to my Sub D I could muffle my desire for a SeaDweller. At least for awhile...

10 May 2012, 03:14 AM	#62
Hesh "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: NJ Watch: SUBc Posts: 34	Would love to see how the 42EII 216570 looks without the cyclops!

10 May 2012, 03:28 AM	#63
joesephcho "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Submariner ND Posts: 188	With or without, still looks great!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)