The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 December 2012, 03:18 AM   #61
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Ultimately it depends on your wrist size, right?

HAGCD!
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 03:19 AM   #62
Castor
"TRF" Member
 
Castor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Canada
Watch: Polar Explorer II
Posts: 1,231
Big watches, to a certain extent, are not a fad. The bigger watches will always appeal to a certain type of person. Possibly a person who likes to be noticed.

The bigger watches will also be preferred I think by people within a certain age demographic who's eyes can't focus in like they used to (people like me). That would fall in line with the 'Boomer' generation. As the Boomers start dying off then the current spike in the desire for larger watches will go with it.

But the desire for larger watches will always be there.
Castor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 04:06 AM   #63
Armyguy03
"TRF" Member
 
Armyguy03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocco22 View Post
hulk hogan is 6'5 and had 21" arms at his biggest and now has 20" arms,only saying cause I have met him a few times.but my main point is why start being an ass when I'm explaining my size to my watch.i don't say anything about your username as its obvious you want everyone to know your in the army.im a bodybuilder and I thought I would explain my size to my watch size and how I think it's weird when I see a 5'6 135 lb guy wearing a 50mm watch.
Chill bro it's just a watch forum. Sense of humors vary, and it's evident that yours and mine failed to meet in the middle. "Being an ass" is subjective, and no further comments are needed. Happy holidays and I hope you find a watch that can satiate your size requirements.



CPT
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Armyguy03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 04:41 AM   #64
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelerFan65 View Post
And I am tired of you so now finally you are like a true ghost--vanished with only your troll like spirit to haunt us.

Bye bye you won't be missed--My first Christmas ban.
Thank you sir. That was perfect timing.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 04:42 AM   #65
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdog View Post
Thank you sir. That was perfect timing.
My pleasure Seth and long overdue!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 05:35 AM   #66
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7 View Post
Personally, I think they have already changed too much. My interest basically stops after 5 digits.
Me too. If PCLs on sports models, RolexRolexRolexRolex..., fat cases, and $8,000 Subs are what we mean by "change", then I'd rather they go back to how they were.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 05:35 AM   #67
Zed Homme
"TRF" Member
 
Zed Homme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
Is it possible to like both small and large?

Lets remember that this large watch trend didn't start for rolex in the last few years with the maxi case. They've been bumping up the size of the date just for the past 40 years. Would the so called purists like 34mm watches? If so they must have really hated it when they grew to 36mm.

Wear what you like.
Zed Homme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 05:42 AM   #68
TimeOnMyHands
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 16570
Posts: 457
I suppose I should comment after owning many higher end brands over the last twelve years...when we talk bigger often we refer to the size of the watch/case only and not necessarily the size of the face ie: increase in dial legibility (the newest EXP II an exception). I have worn larger watches than 40mm but none have been more legible than a well designed, uncluttered dial/face set up. My wifes 36mm Exp I is certainly more legible at a glance than the DSSD and or the Daytona I owned. In terms of heft (that feeling of something substantial on your wrist) again wearing a 262 gram 18kt timepiece quickly became uncomfortable as did 'trying' to make a thick cased watch feel comfortable -- they in the end never truly *disappear* on the wrist. I wear my 16570 and my wife wears her 14270 24/7 in the north and through an extremely active outdoor lifestyle -- often dressed in multi-layered clothing. These watches are supremely comfortable with the more legible dial going to the 14270. So if you reside in a warmer climate where cuffs of tight fitting jackets/winter gloves are a non-issue, or you do not wear your watch while physically active -- then a larger watch could work for you. Ideally a larger watch should mean a clearer, easier to read face -- but that it not always the case. One more thing: I am 6'1" / 230lbs and would feel very comfortable wearing an Explorer 14270 (with an extra link) if I did not own the 16570.
TimeOnMyHands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 05:43 AM   #69
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zed Homme View Post
Is it possible to like both small and large?

Lets remember that this large watch trend didn't start for rolex in the last few years with the maxi case. They've been bumping up the size of the date just for the past 40 years. Would the so called purists like 34mm watches? If so they must have really hated it when they grew to 36mm.

Wear what you like.

words of genius. thank you for that!!!!!
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 06:03 AM   #70
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelerFan65 View Post
And I am tired of you so now finally you are like a true ghost--vanished with only your troll like spirit to haunt us.

Bye bye you won't be missed--My first Christmas ban.
So long overdue - thank you and merry Christmas.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 06:14 AM   #71
theironchef106
"TRF" Member
 
theironchef106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Ft Lauderdale, FL
Watch: Day Date II
Posts: 436
Buy a breitling if you are looking for a big watch
__________________
Someone once told me "Money is not the most important thing in the world. is. Fortunately, I money."
theironchef106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 06:17 AM   #72
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
So long overdue - thank you and merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 06:23 AM   #73
Rocco22
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mass/Vegas/disney
Watch: Hulk,114060,14060
Posts: 929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armyguy03 View Post
Chill bro it's just a watch forum. Sense of humors vary, and it's evident that yours and mine failed to meet in the middle. "Being an ass" is subjective, and no further comments are needed. Happy holidays and I hope you find a watch that can satiate your size requirements.



CPT
No prob bro,happy holidays.
Rocco22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 06:30 AM   #74
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7 View Post
Personally, I think they have already changed too much. My interest basically stops after 5 digits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
Me too. If PCLs on sports models, RolexRolexRolexRolex..., fat cases, and $8,000 Subs are what we mean by "change", then I'd rather they go back to how they were.
Cool!
Maybe we can start a

"= or < 5 Digit Club®"
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 07:50 AM   #75
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
I never understand why these size threads always get so out of hand. Size doesn't matter, it's how you wear it.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 08:00 AM   #76
imono
"TRF" Member
 
imono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
I never understand why these size threads always get so out of hand. Size doesn't matter, it's how you wear it.
Size matters.
A woman wearing a 40mm always likes it bigger.
Go ask her!
Ask any women if they like it bigger or smaller.
Most will say bigger watch.
imono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 08:23 AM   #77
FLB03TT
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Franz
Location: Colorado/Florida
Watch: PAM, G.O., G.P.
Posts: 174
Imono: Very interesting observation.
FLB03TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 08:41 AM   #78
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakesALickin View Post
I'm hoping the trend toward bigger and bigger watches is finally starting to reverse. I sympathise with guys who have 8" wrists, but my sense is that they are in the minority.
8 1/4 here ,,, still on a 36mm watch, now i seldom wear a sub as it feels big , im thinking mid size ym next.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 08:54 AM   #79
Tony-GB
"TRF" Member
 
Tony-GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
I never understand why these size threads always get so out of hand. Size doesn't matter, it's how you wear it.
Tell that to my mistress!
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?"

http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/

www.cheetah.org
Tony-GB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 10:06 AM   #80
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
Cool!
Maybe we can start a

"= or < 5 Digit Club®"
Consider me a member.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 02:00 PM   #81
Bulldurham08
"TRF" Member
 
Bulldurham08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Kyle
Location: PA
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 404
RIP swiss ghost. After reading the first page of this thread, I was begging for a ban...Complete troll, immature behavior.

Merry Christmas! lol
__________________
Rolex Datejust II 116300
(new watch swagger in full effect)

Bulldurham08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 02:12 PM   #82
Jsan20
"TRF" Member
 
Jsan20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: James
Location: Michigan
Watch: 116613LB
Posts: 861
I originally passed on Rolex because of the size and purchased a breitling. However, my second and third purchases were rolex. I love the size of the sub and now I am thinking of getting a second one. Also, will probably pick up a SD in the next few years if I can swing it. I hope they don't change a thing.
Jsan20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 06:00 PM   #83
Cato
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Land of the Lost
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7 View Post
Personally, I think they have already changed too much.
I agree; even the DDII and DJII don't have any appeal to me. A part of me feels that they aren't exactly genuine; even though I know they are. I guess I'm still living in the 80s when I first got to know the brand.
Cato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 06:35 PM   #84
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Interesting discussion. It seems to me that Rolex takes it's own approach to how its watches should look and what size they should be. They don't seem to follow in much of anything, especially in terms of fashions trends.

When I first became interested in Rolex a long time ago, most of the line was relatively huge compared to other brands. But this is what they thought their watches should look like. All these decades later many of these models are still in production and except for minor evolutionary (rather than revolutionary) changes, Rolex has stayed true to the original vision of the proper size and style cues for these models.

I'm not sure the "average" buyer getting older thing means watches will get bigger. Watches have been around an awful long time, why would that trend just be happening now?

Perhaps larger watches are here to stay and perhaps not. But even if they are, a 40mm Sub or GMT is not a puny timepiece and there is much more to wrist presence that just diameter. There is also the possibility that at least to an extent the large watch thing was influenced by the lady's fashion trend towards wearing oversize or men's watches, this causing men to want something larger than what women were wearing. If the lady's fashion trend reverses, which it very well may, so might the trend to larger watches for men.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 09:08 PM   #85
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7 View Post
Personally, I think they have already changed too much. My interest basically stops after 5 digits.
Me too.
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 11:39 PM   #86
69mach351
"TRF" Member
 
69mach351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Midwest
Watch: 116900
Posts: 1,066
I am a bigger guy and have just over an 8" wrist. Anything smaller than 40mm looks way to small on me. I really wanted an air king, but it looked like a ladies watch when I put it on. That said, even though I need a bigger watch , I still want it to look like a normal watch. Many of the larger watches (44+mm) tend to look like a fashion watch or rip off the U-Boat design which still seems like a fashion watch, and that does not appeal to me either. I would like Rolex to have more/continued offerings in the 40-44mm range, because I know they will look more traditional and not like some rapper hardware.
69mach351 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 11:41 PM   #87
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by iberfoptic View Post
Hi i really love the rolex brand the only thing that stops me from pulling the trigger on one is that i like bigger size watches and was wondering do you experts think rolex will make a bigger size sub i have seen the deep sea which is nice but very thick i actually own a omega planet ocean xl which is a great size for me so what do you think will happen at baselworld this year please tell me a bigger sub is on its way....
They have changed. And they have stayed true to their roots.

They already make a bigger Sub, it is called a Sea Dweller. No one here can tell you what is on the way. Live, be happy!
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 11:42 PM   #88
jets
"TRF" Member
 
jets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mario
Location: CANADA
Posts: 2,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by iberfoptic View Post
Hi i really love the rolex brand the only thing that stops me from pulling the trigger on one is that i like bigger size watches and was wondering do you experts think rolex will make a bigger size sub i have seen the deep sea which is nice but very thick i actually own a omega planet ocean xl which is a great size for me so what do you think will happen at baselworld this year please tell me a bigger sub is on its way....
Established companies don't just change their whole lineup in an instant. Why alienate the core customer base to attract another? It will take time but eventually we'll see bigger options.
__________________
DJII 116234 · Submariner 126610LV · Yacht Master 42 226659
Pelagos 25600TN
Ω X-33 Speedmaster Skywalker · 1861 Speedmaster Modsukoshi · SMP 2254.50 · SMP 2230.50 NAC · Seamaster 300 166.0324 · Genève 162.037
Seiko SLA033 Willard · SKX007
jets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 11:47 PM   #89
kxux
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
kxux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Jan
Location: PA
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 1,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Where'd you read that Rolex was losing sales daily? Last thing I read indicated that they just had a banner year. The Seadweller and Explorer lines have never really been high sellers. I really doubt a Sub bigger than 40" will happen.
^^
|-----This.

And I must say that I love my DSSD. I also feel that the current Rolex line-up is well balanced.
kxux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 11:59 PM   #90
kxux
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
kxux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Jan
Location: PA
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 1,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psmith View Post
There are so many factors involved, beyond mere 'size', that threads on this subject rarely seem to have all in agreement. For example; age/demographic, personal style preference, brand preference, watch design (small watches that wear large and vice-versa), etc ad infinitum...
Something I notice around Melbourne, is that more 'mature' gents generally wear a smaller watch (35 mm or less). But describing sizes as 'small' or 'huge' is vague/subjective and not especially helpful

Personally I am happy with watches in the size range 40 - 47 mm, and it just so happens that my favourite brands produce pieces I like within that range

I like the Sub at 40 mm, but I would also like it at 42 mm or larger
Thank you for putting it so eloquently. This is exactly how I feel - love the 40mm GMT and 43mm DSSD. They are both great. I loved 36mm Exp I as well. Never felt like anything was wrong with any of them on my wrist.
kxux is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.