The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 5 February 2008, 09:08 AM   #61
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman View Post
JJ has a 4 second issue with his sheep too


__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 February 2008, 02:29 PM   #62
116710LN
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kennedy
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 30
why I am so interested in the accuracy (or you might say that is repeatibility), because the GMTII can only be adjusted the date by turning the hour hand (at Position 2) clockwise only. In the meanwhile, your minute and second hands will be keep running to maintain your watch time when you are changing the date. That is a good feature of GMTII or EXP II (the both use the 3185 or 3186 movements).
116710LN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 February 2008, 09:36 PM   #63
RAS
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Reza
Location: Malaysia
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 21
Speaking of accuracy, my EXPII which I bought last year (around March) have been running quicker than it should. I actually held back from having it regulated as I wanted to give it ample time to "run in".

Well, last time I synched it with accurist website (and a TAG quartz) was 02/01/08 and as of yesterday the EXPII was quicker by 8 minutes or so, whilst the TAG was off by a couple of seconds or so.

So I decided to bring it in to the RSC. The lady behind the counter took it to their technician to be tested and after 15 minutes or so came back out to tell me that the watch was "magnetized" and asked me if I worked long hours in front of the computer (which was quite the case). She told me they have demagnetised (at no charge) it and it should be running okay.

Will let you guys know how it goes after this.

RAS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2008, 12:57 AM   #64
RAS
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Reza
Location: Malaysia
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAS View Post
Well, last time I synched it with accurist website (and a TAG quartz) was 02/01/08 and as of yesterday the EXPII was quicker by 8 minutes or so, whilst the TAG was off by a couple of seconds or so.

Just to be exact, 02/01/08 should read 2nd January 2008 as I've only recalled in some parts of the world, the said date could be read as 1st of February 2008.

RAS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 February 2008, 01:20 AM   #65
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710LN View Post
why I am so interested in the accuracy (or you might say that is repeatibility), because the GMTII can only be adjusted the date by turning the hour hand (at Position 2) clockwise only. In the meanwhile, your minute and second hands will be keep running to maintain your watch time when you are changing the date. That is a good feature of GMTII or EXP II (the both use the 3185 or 3186 movements).
I don't think that's true. I think it's okay to set the hour hand in either direction, clockwise or counterclockwise. That stands to reason, because you don't always travel in the same direction. If you're travelling west, you don't want to have to spin all the way through the calendar just to set the correct time.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.