The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 25 December 2014, 11:54 PM   #61
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
Btw - JLC doesn't have a great residual value fwiw
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 12:24 AM   #62
rollerball
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 245
Got a feeling that the new Cellini will be successful. Whether its better than Patek, JLC is subjective. But its at least much much better than similar range from Cartier, Bulgari, Omega etc etc. I think that's the market share Rolex is eyeing at rather than fans of the oyster, Patek, AP. Nevertheless, if the Cellini line comes out with an Annual Calendar, something like the Sky-Dweller, then, they are heading towards Patek. Anyway the cellini line is really nice, especially the time only rose gold black dial model.
rollerball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 12:34 AM   #63
andrewd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 360
I think the new Cellinis are way too big for a dress watch.
andrewd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 12:36 AM   #64
submariner123
"TRF" Member
 
submariner123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: England
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewd View Post
I think the new Cellinis are way too big for a dress watch.
Same size as the new Patek Calatrava 5227.
submariner123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 12:57 AM   #65
Rondineli
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Watch: DJ II
Posts: 1,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinquecento View Post
Merry Christmas!
Fantastic watch merry Xmas !
Rondineli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 01:01 AM   #66
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
Absolutely beautiful.
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 01:20 AM   #67
Dyim
"TRF" Member
 
Dyim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,237
The silver guilloche dials look stunning IMO.
Dyim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 01:52 AM   #68
ansharma
"TRF" Member
 
ansharma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Watch: Lange 1 Moonphase
Posts: 1,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewd View Post
I think the new Cellinis are way too big for a dress watch.
Really? It's 39mm which I think is a great size. It's modern-classic size
ansharma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 01:56 AM   #69
xchjhgj
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: mr
Posts: 3
Those date numbers must be tiny. Are they even readable? [img]http://******.com/ws9eg[/img] [img]http://******.com/paea6[/img]
xchjhgj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 02:07 AM   #70
ansharma
"TRF" Member
 
ansharma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Watch: Lange 1 Moonphase
Posts: 1,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by xchjhgj View Post
Those date numbers must be tiny. Are they even readable? [img]http://******.com/ws9eg[/img] [img]http://******.com/paea6[/img]
They were fine to me - I've seen smaller sub dials.

ansharma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 02:13 AM   #71
bdex75
"TRF" Member
 
bdex75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
It is my opinion that if Rolex dropped the Cellini name and gave them a regular model name and put them in the lineup and catalog with all the other watches that say "Rolex" on the dial they would be much more popular (and hold their value better). Look at the Air King. Same issues. People think it's a "cheap" or "entry level" Rolex. The average consumer cannot afford and the WIS look down upon them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bdex75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 03:10 AM   #72
andrewd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by submariner123 View Post
Same size as the new Patek Calatrava 5227.
Personal preference of course, but I think this style of watch is better suited to a smaller size, like the PP 5516.
andrewd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 03:21 AM   #73
Choo Yao Chuen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 518
I love the new Cellinis
Choo Yao Chuen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 03:40 AM   #74
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
I really like the new Cellini line but I must be honest if the price was comparable I'd go for this.
Attached Images
 
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 03:47 AM   #75
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Congrats!
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 05:34 AM   #76
~JJ
"TRF" Member
 
~JJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,291
Not sure why people are comparing the new Cellini with a Calatrava in terms of direct competition. Yes, both are on the dressy side, strap bands and gold cases. However, one cost about 50% less $ from my understanding, which makes it an obtainable gold piece for the masses!
~JJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 07:50 AM   #77
ansharma
"TRF" Member
 
ansharma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Watch: Lange 1 Moonphase
Posts: 1,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~JJ View Post
Not sure why people are comparing the new Cellini with a Calatrava in terms of direct competition. Yes, both are on the dressy side, strap bands and gold cases. However, one cost about 50% less $ from my understanding, which makes it an obtainable gold piece for the masses!
Totally agree.

I prefer this is over a Calatrava all day long - they just look a bit old fashioned to me.
ansharma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 06:18 PM   #78
rollerball
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 245
I think the problem lies in the name "Cellini". Sounds feminine for a men's line of dress watch. And if you pronounce it slightly wrongly, it may sounds like "Silly". I really hope Rolex would consider changing the name of the line. Otherwise, it does not do any justice for such a fantastic line of dress watches.
rollerball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 06:27 PM   #79
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by rollerball View Post
I think the problem lies in the name "Cellini". Sounds feminine for a men's line of dress watch. And if you pronounce it slightly wrongly, it may sounds like "Silly". I really hope Rolex would consider changing the name of the line. Otherwise, it does not do any justice for such a fantastic line of dress watches.
It doesn't sound feminine in Europe, at least among educated people (who are the target market for Rolex dress watches). The line is named after this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benvenuto_Cellini
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 06:39 PM   #80
rollerball
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 245
Rolex Benvenuto would sound more marketable I feel.

~~The Rolex Benvenuto, educated choice for smart people~~
rollerball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2014, 11:09 PM   #81
submariner123
"TRF" Member
 
submariner123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: England
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewd View Post
Personal preference of course, but I think this style of watch is better suited to a smaller size, like the PP 5516.
Yeah tbh I agree.
submariner123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.