The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 August 2015, 01:14 PM   #61
Scot_3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Scot
Location: USA
Watch: 1966 boyscout
Posts: 914
Oh wow what a story, glad it worked out, I'm never that lucky
__________________
Thanks Scot
Scot_3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2015, 06:13 PM   #62
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
I was a bit alarmed reading the thread title. Cool story and glad all is well, but hardly hair raising and I dread more important things for sure, particularly health type concerns with family and such.

You need to insure your watch, so next time you can just shrug it off and not be have any hairs raised.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2015, 06:34 PM   #63
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicked View Post
Even though you're a moderator, I don't think that's a constructive comment. My opinion.
Padi can be a bit dry, but has a lot of wisdom even in his seemingly turtle faced humour. How many threads are posted about Rolex being too shiny, hating pcls, not liking ceramics...that the watches aren't rugged or "tool" watch enough.....and then there's this post where the crystal was almost nicked.....because it was being used.
With the demographic of this thread and my background in medicine, the thread title was sombering and as I read the thread I was alarmed at the possibility that someone may have a health crisis with a family member or tragic accident narrowly avoided........but no, it was a possible chip in a watch crystal? sorry but....face palm.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2015, 06:56 PM   #64
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
Padi can be a bit dry, but has a lot of wisdom even in his seemingly turtle faced humour. How many threads are posted about Rolex being too shiny, hating pcls, not liking ceramics...that the watches aren't rugged or "tool" watch enough.....and then there's this post where the crystal was almost nicked.....because it was being used.
With the demographic of this thread and my background in medicine, the thread title was sombering and as I read the thread I was alarmed at the possibility that someone may have a health crisis with a family member or tragic accident narrowly avoided........but no, it was a possible chip in a watch crystal? sorry but....face palm.
Couldn't agree more.
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.