ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
6 March 2016, 10:55 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
|
Blnr.
|
6 March 2016, 11:33 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Scotland
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 292
|
blnr
|
6 March 2016, 02:37 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Blake
Location: US
Watch: Daytonas
Posts: 1,869
|
42 mm expii for sure. Larger size, brushed bracelet, and legibility caused me to flip gmtiic and keep my 42mm polar.
|
6 March 2016, 02:48 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Jakarta
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 106
|
I might be biased since i only have Exp II. I took it because i need the second time zone, although not sure whether i need the third time zone of GMT II. And my wrist is only 6.25 but very happy with the choice.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.