ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: What type of Rolex owner are you? | |||
Investor, Buy because of the growth potential | 46 | 11.47% | |
Aestheticist, Buy because of the watch appearance | 190 | 47.38% | |
Technologist, But because the watches are technically excellent | 118 | 29.43% | |
Collectaholic, Buy because your a collector who needs to be collecting the hottest products. | 47 | 11.72% | |
Afficianodo, Buy because you want the best. | 137 | 34.16% | |
Joiner, Buy because you like to own the hottest watches. | 19 | 4.74% | |
Casual owner. Bought because Rolex is the best or because you were given a Rolex | 60 | 14.96% | |
Sentimentalist, Buy because someone dear to you owned a Rolex. | 39 | 9.73% | |
Heroist, Buy because you admire those famous Rolex owners. | 22 | 5.49% | |
Other, Open to ideas not represented in the choices. | 55 | 13.72% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 401. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15 June 2021, 11:53 AM | #61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
You also seem to be fairly dismissive of people interested in learning more about the watches in general- in that thread where someone asked about the differences between a regular sub and the original LV, you stated the only the difference was the bezel, and when it was pointed out that this was not correct, you deflected. What topics do you WANT people to talk about here that would excite you to share your knowledge of the brand and its history? Circling back to the original question posed in the thread, I bought a Rolex because I wanted to “check a box” so to speak. Rolex didn’t reach the position it holds today by building low quality watches, so some of the hype is justified. I very much appreciate that my 116200 Datejust looks largely the same as the original model introduced over 70 years ago, and still think it’s the perfect casual watch that blends sport with dress. Very few brands seem to have figured out how to make minimal changes over time while keeping their designs current. Omega has done it with the Speedmaster, but that’s unfortunately the exception to the rule for them. |
|
15 June 2021, 12:46 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
I got into Rolex because I had no idea about watches. The sales rep said I couldn’t go wrong with Rolex. Well what she said was true. But later on I found out that Rolex was just the tip of the iceberg
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
15 June 2021, 01:17 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
That’s a great point. I think many of us would fit into that category as well. Call it the “researcher/hunter”. That’s definitely part of it for me, too.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.