ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2013, 03:56 AM | #91 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Roy
Location: Scotland and Oman
Watch: 16613 / SBGM031
Posts: 33
|
My first GS arrived while I was in the sandpit, absolutely exquisite.
Feels very light, obviously made for smaller wrists (I'm on second last hole on the strap) would post up on original thread but it's now locked. happy bunny (despite freezing my bits off being back in Scotland now) really difficult to get in a picture just how "Lively" the watch is, think this one conveys a little of the "life" in the watch. The 16613 that usually lives there has much more "Presence" on the wrist that the SBGM031 but, both put such a smile on my face for very different reasons. Rolex is superb. GS is superb. The amount of flying I do, absolute accuracy is a moot point as I tend to be re-setting local time so often (tho the local time setting on the 031 is seriously well thought out, so I might see cumulative errors on that) You'll never impress a non WIS with a GS as it is "just" a Seiko. But you'll never annoy people wearing a GS as it is "just" a Seiko. I don't think you can choose one over the other as they are so different. just my $0.02. Now, I'm back off to stare at my watch (and then still be none the wiser what time it is) How silly is it that we can / do stare at our timepieces without registering what time it is wrist art / fine engineering / source of happy smiles. excuse iPhone photo, best I could do. Last edited by airwave; 17 March 2013 at 03:59 AM.. Reason: Spelling mistake corrected (other may still be there) |
17 March 2013, 04:59 AM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
|
Beautiful watch and photo, Roy.
|
17 March 2013, 09:14 AM | #93 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
Quite stunning - congrats!
__________________
|
|
27 March 2013, 03:26 AM | #94 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Roy
Location: Scotland and Oman
Watch: 16613 / SBGM031
Posts: 33
|
Had the gs since the picture above was taken, all 10 days (and 3 watchstraps, did not get along with the oem strap/deployant)
Set it precisely to timeanddate.com Checked it today, it is -1/2 second (total) over 10 days....... |
27 March 2013, 04:35 AM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: weehawken
Posts: 847
|
GSs are awesome.. pay attention to the way the hands/markers reflect light.
My 'blingy' RO 15450 cant compete in this area. |
27 March 2013, 02:09 PM | #96 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD
Posts: 34
|
Hi, this is my second GS and first spring drive. It's on a curved-end leather strap(seiko z20) which to me looks better than on a bracelet.
|
27 March 2013, 03:29 PM | #97 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
If rolex gain 3 seconds per day, GS gain 3 seconds per week. amazing
|
27 March 2013, 06:14 PM | #98 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
Lovely - congrats!
__________________
|
|
27 March 2013, 06:43 PM | #99 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD
Posts: 34
|
|
30 March 2013, 03:56 AM | #100 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: London, England
Watch: Hmmm...
Posts: 2,483
|
Quote:
Anyway, back on topic and that's a genuinely beautifully engineered and finished watch. Congrats!
__________________
Tony |
|
30 March 2013, 05:34 AM | #101 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Quote:
The LFA isn't meant to compete with an Aventador, it's an exercise in engineering. A GTR will rip an Aventador around a track but that's not the point.....I would still by the Aventador if I could. The NSX looked amazing for it's time and a style still loved by car lovers 'til this day, and if it was a total flop I don't understand how every single one available on the secondary market has an extremely inflated price. Unless you just don't like japanese cars, your assessment is way way off, but it is your opinion and you're entitled to it. The suit analogy is bs.....good riddance. Congrats on the GS purchase, I love the shape of the hands. |
|
30 March 2013, 05:37 AM | #102 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Quote:
|
|
31 March 2013, 06:23 AM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 65
|
Beautiful GS snowflake
|
1 April 2013, 08:36 AM | #104 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Tokyo
Watch: GMT 16710, 1675
Posts: 294
|
Congrats on of great watch. I live in Tokyo and have been looking at buying one myself.They are truly beautifully made watches.
Cheers |
1 April 2013, 12:01 PM | #105 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD
Posts: 34
|
Thanks, it looks better in the flesh than from my crappy pic.
Quote:
|
|
2 April 2013, 04:11 AM | #106 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tampa, Fl
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 313
|
Quote:
|
|
2 April 2013, 10:21 AM | #107 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tampa, Fl
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 313
|
I find the Grand Seiko quartz beautifully done:
|
2 April 2013, 10:26 AM | #108 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 1,326
|
Quartz and mechanical movements are not comparable in regards to accuracy. A G-Shock will have better accuracy then a Submariner without having to specifically buy a GS quartz.
|
2 April 2013, 10:30 AM | #109 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
|
2 April 2013, 10:41 AM | #110 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
|
Would anyone really choose a Grand Seiko over a Rolex at the same price?
|
2 April 2013, 11:03 AM | #111 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
|
2 April 2013, 11:20 AM | #112 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
Of course - and why not?
__________________
|
|
2 April 2013, 11:32 AM | #113 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: weehawken
Posts: 847
|
|
2 April 2013, 11:43 AM | #114 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD
Posts: 34
|
|
2 April 2013, 12:16 PM | #115 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
True. For me, as a one and only watch, the answer would be no. I think someone would need to 'graduate' thru some other brands before going to a GS. ie I don't think anyone buys a PP/VC/AP as their first foray into a 'nice' watch (unless you had squillions of dollars lol).
|
2 April 2013, 04:03 PM | #116 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
|
Hi guys - this is an interesting thread. I started getting into watches around 4 years ago. Prior to that I wore a cheap Seiko. My first foray into "high end" watches was to try on a Rolex SDDS. I got close but have yet to buy my first Rolex. Over the years, I've added a few watches to my collection. Even got very close to picking up a Patek Nautilus. But strangely, my tastes in watches have changed. For example, whilst I own Panerais, I now have a preference for smaller more traditional sized/weighted watches. Honestly - would I buy a GS for the same price as a Rolex? Honestly, I probably would. The reason is that I look at watches a lot more differently now than what I did when I first started. So - anyway, TODAY - I put my order in for a Grand Seiko. Can't wait to see it... and will share some pics once its in my hands.
__________________
Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko |
2 April 2013, 04:08 PM | #117 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
Congrats Bryan! You can be assured you will be in a select group of GS owners. Esp in the likes of HK where you are, where you are probably surrounded by Rolex wearers everywhere!
|
2 April 2013, 04:15 PM | #118 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
|
Hi Cary
Many thanks. I too have spent many hours contemplating about the proverbial question "is a Grand Seiko worth the money". For me at least, I am quite comfortable with the image and perhaps lack of brand cache of GS. And yes, in some ways, its kind of cool to be going against the grain. Every taxi driver here seems to have a Rolex, and every Tom Dick and Harry a Panerai.... cheers...
__________________
Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko |
2 April 2013, 05:34 PM | #119 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
Congrats!
__________________
|
|
2 April 2013, 08:51 PM | #120 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
|
Thanks Clive. I've bought a few watches before, but there is something about the GS that has me in anticipation like no other. I think its because many have talked highly of the workmanship and how you've got to see it in the metal. So I'm waiting anxiously to see it...
__________________
Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.