The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 April 2018, 10:03 AM   #91
dtekrad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: los angeles
Posts: 19
excellent information here on Rolex as "investment." I think when people use this word they are using it to describe whether it serves more as storage of wealth rather than buying shares of stocks or bonds. Currently the stock market is at all time highs and in due time our portfoilos can decrease anywhere from 20-50% with a recession.

IMHO, if we have desirable Rolex models, it will retain much of its value and in 10-20 years the return will be of equal and/or higher value. General invesment advice do suggest keeping 'hard assets' in our portfolios at approx 10% which refer to precious metals (ie gold, silver). Why not have a Rolex as part of that category.

-JR
dtekrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2018, 11:13 AM   #92
Amochosto
"TRF" Member
 
Amochosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,168
Investments pay dividends. Dividends buy me Rolexes!

Amochosto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2018, 01:46 PM   #93
Greenandwhite
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: MI
Watch: 124060
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeToWatch View Post
I think people too often confuse speculation with investing.

I’d say anything that in and of itself generates wealth may be considered an investment. Examples being:
-stocks: you own a piece of a company which generates a profit paid in the form of a dividend or reinvestment into the company
-bonds/treasuries: you are paid a rate commensurate with the riskiness of the asset
-real estate: You can rent the property out and generate a profit.

I think oftentimes people confuse “investment” with speculation. Speculation is buying something on the belief that someone at some future date will be willing to pay more for it based on its inherent worth. Examples of speculation are:
-Gold: Gold generates no wealth. You are simply betting someone will one day pay more for it.
-Bitcoin
-Watches
-Cars
Well said. Everybody should do as they see fit but by definition a Rolex isn’t an investment. That doesn’t mean they cannot appreciate in value.
Greenandwhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2018, 11:34 PM   #94
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
To me wearing a Rolex is an investmant, not necessarily to make money but to enjoy and hold its value very well.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2018, 11:40 PM   #95
WEST HAM ROLEX
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinMay View Post
We're all adults here...we should all be able to do whatever we want with our hard earn money :) .

buy watches...
buy stocks...
buy homes...
buy cars...
buy toys...

So, make your own decision and just make sure you have fun :)
Exactly
WEST HAM ROLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2018, 11:53 PM   #96
Buckeye4life
"TRF" Member
 
Buckeye4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Steve
Location: Little Rock, AR
Watch: Z blue Milgauss
Posts: 207
I go by 2 "rules" of thumb: avoid leveraging depreciating assets, and understand the true cost of ownership (e.g. insurance, maintenance, depreciation, and time-value of money, etc.). Rolex watches can perform much better than many other expensive hobbies like cars, clothes, and technology. Buy smart, consider used, and you can get pretty close to wearing a savings account on your wrist.
__________________

2016 Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue
2015 Frederique Constant FC715H4S6 Manufacture Moon Phase
2015 Seiko SARG017
Buckeye4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2018, 12:09 AM   #97
faimag
"TRF" Member
 
faimag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
Not sure why one would get a Rolex, or any watch for that matter, as an investment

I prefer not to wear my long-term financial security on my wrist
faimag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2018, 12:18 AM   #98
TeddyS
"TRF" Member
 
TeddyS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Teddy
Location: London U.K.
Watch: sea-dweller 126600
Posts: 670
25/30% drop? SS professional models drop like that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TeddyS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2018, 12:33 AM   #99
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtekrad View Post
excellent information here on Rolex as "investment." I think when people use this word they are using it to describe whether it serves more as storage of wealth rather than buying shares of stocks or bonds. Currently the stock market is at all time highs and in due time our portfoilos can decrease anywhere from 20-50% with a recession.

IMHO, if we have desirable Rolex models, it will retain much of its value and in 10-20 years the return will be of equal and/or higher value. General invesment advice do suggest keeping 'hard assets' in our portfolios at approx 10% which refer to precious metals (ie gold, silver). Why not have a Rolex as part of that category.

-JR
not in the long run they don't. With that timeframe the market will be higher.

If its 50% lower than today in 10-20 years, I can pretty much guarantee that your rolex will also be worth nothing as there will be much bigger problems than trying to sell a watch not a single person can afford. Your watches value is tied to the general health of the economy in a big way so it is illogical to put money in watches to hedge against a stock market crash.

I agree with the concept of a Rolex as a cash equivalent as savings accounts make no interest anyway.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2018, 12:53 AM   #100
Bt122
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Bi coastal
Watch: Ok...Watching
Posts: 937
What he said^
Bt122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2018, 11:24 AM   #101
dtekrad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: los angeles
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
not in the long run they don't. With that timeframe the market will be higher.

If its 50% lower than today in 10-20 years, I can pretty much guarantee that your rolex will also be worth nothing as there will be much bigger problems than trying to sell a watch not a single person can afford. Your watches value is tied to the general health of the economy in a big way so it is illogical to put money in watches to hedge against a stock market crash.

I agree with the concept of a Rolex as a cash equivalent as savings accounts make no interest anyway.

*Tyler. I agree with all your points. I am not stating that we buy Rolex as a cash equivalent to sell when we need to in a down market. I am simply stating that stocks are at all time high and probably a bubble. Next drop will not be pretty and there can easily be a 30-50% drop. Of course the market will return and I feel that the Rolex SS models should retain its price and with a return in economic health, the watch will preserve and possibly be higher than its original pricing.
dtekrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2018, 09:37 PM   #102
Aventura
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
You are right in everything. And aside you forgot what a service is worth (around $ 700 that you will need in ten years). When you try to sell it you will never get the same price that you see in the ads of the gray dealers. I assure you that in my long life I sold many things not only watches and I assure you that dealing with a gray dealer is much better than a private one because they have a few dollars and think that they are the kings of the world and will exploit you to the fullest. IMHO.
Aventura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2018, 02:25 AM   #103
Mr. Adair
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4
Hmmm...

Not sure I agree with those depreciation numbers at all. Are you buying the wrong watches? I'm no stock market guru but every Rolex I have had has averaged 12% increase in value per year. My 401K has been as low as 7%. My 1982 GMT Master was purchased for $2800 and I sold it like a idiot for 6K 7 years later. Probably a 12K watch now. My 5513 was purchased for 5K and I was offered 10K for it last week. Compare with various JLC's/IWC's etc. I have been beaten up by 50% on several! It's also a helluva lot more fun than stocks :)
Mr. Adair is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.