The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 11 September 2018, 12:00 AM   #1
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,707
Boss daily watch



🤣🤣🤣🤣


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2018, 01:35 AM   #2
RRKnight
"TRF" Member
 
RRKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 405
SD43 for me.
RRKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2018, 09:53 AM   #3
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRKnight View Post
SD43 for me.
Great Shot!!!!
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2018, 01:49 AM   #4
R!$
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
the red one
R!$ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2018, 02:21 AM   #5
ras47
"TRF" Member
 
ras47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
I'm reconsidering my negative stance on the SD43. I've always eschewed the new design for the original SD4K. Tradition, history, etc. But I've made this determination without ever seeing the SD43 in person, which is kind of naive on my part.

My grail watch (attained last year) is the GMT Master II BLRO. Lately my fears of a 40mm watch being too small for my 7 3/4" wrist is beginning to recur. I hesitated to buy the GMT because of this, dithering for 30+ years before saying "what the heck."

I was so enamored with the BLRO after coveting it from afar for so long that I talked myself into believing the size was just fine. It's almost fine, mostly fine, but not ideal. Since the SD4K uses an almost identical case it's going to have the same overall size issues for me. Hence my rethinking of my stance on the SD43. I guess my next step is to try on a SD43. Easier said than done these days.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710
Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono
ras47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 01:35 AM   #6
PJC
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: England
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 36
Pre Ceramic 16600 for me, rough and ready watch, perfect proportions. There’s a good reason it lasted so long
PJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 10:39 AM   #7
BlueAZ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Bill
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 73
Agreed, I look at my 16600 every day and it's just like the first time I took it out of the box. It's understated, classic, and the proportions are perfect.
BlueAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 10:39 AM   #8
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJC View Post
Pre Ceramic 16600 for me, rough and ready watch, perfect proportions. There’s a good reason it lasted so long
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAZ View Post
Agreed, I look at my 16600 every day and it's just like the first time I took it out of the box. It's understated, classic, and the proportions are perfect.
Hopefully one day I’ll get a chance to sea one !!!
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 10:42 AM   #9
rph08
"TRF" Member
 
rph08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: USA
Posts: 992
I like the entire SD range. I've got a SDc4K, and may add the new style Deep Blue in the future.
__________________
Can you name the truck with four wheel drive,
smells like a steak and seats thirty-five...

Canyonero! Canyonero!
rph08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 11:07 AM   #10
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
Deep blue has the most unique dial imho
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 11:52 AM   #11
pigman08
"TRF" Member
 
pigman08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tn
Watch: 16610,16710,214270
Posts: 454
16600 for me... I don’t care for the fully indexed bezel on the later iterations, probably due to the fact that I’m accustomed to the bezel on my 16610.
pigman08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2018, 01:23 AM   #12
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by pigman08 View Post
16600 for me... I don’t care for the fully indexed bezel on the later iterations, probably due to the fact that I’m accustomed to the bezel on my 16610.
Never owned a 16600 or 16610ln so to me the
fully indexed bezel is quite intriguing but I can see
the attraction towards the traditional steel bezel...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 05:29 AM   #13
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by pigman08 View Post
16600 for me... I don’t care for the fully indexed bezel on the later iterations, probably due to the fact that I’m accustomed to the bezel on my 16610.
I understand the fully indexed bezel is an ISO requirement now for saturation dive watches; it's not just a design decision. I've seen this on a web site but have been unable to find more references. Anyone?
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 11:40 AM   #14
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
I understand the fully indexed bezel is an ISO requirement now for saturation dive watches; it's not just a design decision. I've seen this on a web site but have been unable to find more references. Anyone?
Good point and good to know Lee.
I didn’t know about this ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 05:26 PM   #15
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
I understand the fully indexed bezel is an ISO requirement now for saturation dive watches; it's not just a design decision. I've seen this on a web site but have been unable to find more references. Anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by superstarmar View Post
Good point and good to know Lee.
I didn’t know about this ...
Only if the dial itself doesn’t have minute markers. As the Rolex dials do, the fully graduated bezel of the Sea Dwellers is not actually required to meet the ISO standards.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 06:07 PM   #16
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
Only if the dial itself doesn’t have minute markers. As the Rolex dials do, the fully graduated bezel of the Sea Dwellers is not actually required to meet the ISO standards.
I understand; I saw somewhere that it was different. But I'm unable to find it.

Below is the best discussion for ISO6425 I've been able to find.

http://timetransformed.com/2017/02/1...ches-iso-6425/
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2018, 03:21 PM   #17
007_Omega
"TRF" Member
 
007_Omega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 905
Honestly, Rolex hit the SD43 out of the park with its proportions. I have never tried on an SD4K but I feel 39mm (that's what people here have said is the actual size) and 15mm thickness would feel incredibly top heavy.

That being said, I do not like the cyclops on a Rolex diver.
007_Omega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2018, 04:53 AM   #18
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007_Omega View Post
Honestly, Rolex hit the SD43 out of the park with its proportions. I have never tried on an SD4K but I feel 39mm (that's what people here have said is the actual size) and 15mm thickness would feel incredibly top heavy.

That being said, I do not like the cyclops on a Rolex diver.
I have a sub c Bluesy and can assure you the SD4K C doesn’t wear
like a 39 mm it actually looks and wears
larger than a sub c cause I have both ...

Now the SD43 is still a phenomenon cause I have yet
to see or try one on in the flesh ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 September 2018, 04:40 PM   #19
acfcheung
"TRF" Member
 
acfcheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: AC
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SD4K for now
Posts: 422
SD4K all day everyday

Sent from my VKY-L29 using Tapatalk
acfcheung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 11:48 AM   #20
Glidelock
"TRF" Member
 
Glidelock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Will Zdorf
Location: So. Cal.
Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC
Posts: 1,947
SDC4K for the Win!!!
Glidelock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 01:11 PM   #21
jbsmith
"TRF" Member
 
jbsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Blake
Location: US
Watch: Daytonas
Posts: 1,869
D blue jc1 gets my vote.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
jbsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 03:25 PM   #22
Bakko
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 50
I personally love the SD43. The 43mm isn’t too big and hugs your wrist nicely. I have a 7.15-7.25inch wrist and i love the way it sits. It’s bigger than a regular sub in a good way. It’s the sub for those wanting a sub without blending in the crowd of subs in my opinion. I also prefer a little heft to a watch, the sub/gmt is too light for me, and I’m not a big guy.

I personally also love the cyclops. It’s definitely a Rolex trademark and I never understood why people hated it so much, I think the date without the cyclops looks weird.

I love the red lettering looking back at me each time I check my wrist (just to check out the watch, not necessarily the time). I really hope they discontinue the red lettering soon to make it even more special.

The gas release valve makes it known it’s a sea dweller right off the bat.

Lastly, I love the tick marks which go all the way around the bezel.

My $.2



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bakko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 03:28 PM   #23
Bakko
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakko View Post
I personally love the SD43. The 43mm isn’t too big and hugs your wrist nicely. I have a 7.15-7.25inch wrist and i love the way it sits. It’s bigger than a regular sub in a good way. It’s the sub for those wanting a sub without blending in the crowd of subs in my opinion. I also prefer a little heft to a watch, the sub/gmt is too light for me, and I’m not a big guy.

I personally also love the cyclops. It’s definitely a Rolex trademark and I never understood why people hated it so much, I think the date without the cyclops looks weird.

I love the red lettering looking back at me each time I check my wrist (just to check out the watch, not necessarily the time). I really hope they discontinue the red lettering soon to make it even more special.

The gas release valve makes it known it’s a sea dweller right off the bat.

Lastly, I love the tick marks which go all the way around the bezel.

My $.2



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Forgot to include a photo :)






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bakko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 06:32 PM   #24
rambo99
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tokyo
Watch: SD43,PAM1616,Hulk
Posts: 3,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakko View Post
I personally love the SD43. The 43mm isn’t too big and hugs your wrist nicely. I have a 7.15-7.25inch wrist and i love the way it sits. It’s bigger than a regular sub in a good way. It’s the sub for those wanting a sub without blending in the crowd of subs in my opinion. I also prefer a little heft to a watch, the sub/gmt is too light for me, and I’m not a big guy.

I personally also love the cyclops. It’s definitely a Rolex trademark and I never understood why people hated it so much, I think the date without the cyclops looks weird.

I love the red lettering looking back at me each time I check my wrist (just to check out the watch, not necessarily the time). I really hope they discontinue the red lettering soon to make it even more special.

The gas release valve makes it known it’s a sea dweller right off the bat.

Lastly, I love the tick marks which go all the way around the bezel.

My $.2



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
they are not going to remove the red text any time soon, why would they? it's the new seadweller's signature.
rambo99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 06:02 PM   #25
soran
"TRF" Member
 
soran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: wait list
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 551
Sd4k is in my opinion the ultimate. No maxi case but all the goods of a modern Rolex
soran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2018, 10:56 PM   #26
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
116600. The unique ceramic with narrow handles
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 12:06 PM   #27
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post
116600. The unique ceramic with narrow handles
Hard to argue with that ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 12:22 PM   #28
Texasjim
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Jim
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: ...this!
Posts: 217
In my eyes...they are all super cool. I have had all of them over the years. As much as I dig the 5 digit classics, the moderns surpasses them.

I believe the SD is the ultimate in Rolex SS sports models, and think the 43 is the best of the SD’s.
__________________
114060, 116010lv, 126710BLRO, 126610, 116600, 4x5513, 4x1675, 2x16610, 2x1680, 16610LV, 16710, 116500, 124300, 16803, 5512, 114300, 126618, 2x6536/1, 6205, 18038, 16570, 1665, 126333, 126603
Texasjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 01:24 PM   #29
Bigcohiba
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Richard
Location: CT
Watch: 1999 SD & SD43
Posts: 25
Choices


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Bigcohiba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2018, 07:09 PM   #30
kans86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,340
The SD4K for me is the best of both world. I also like the SD43, but find it a little big.
Attached Images
 
kans86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.