The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 13 January 2019, 12:30 PM   #1
Ar_Mi
"TRF" Member
 
Ar_Mi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Dubai/Los Angeles
Watch: a few
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
15400 vs. 15500

Is it me, or are the bezel nuts/screws a bit bigger on the 15500 than on the 15400?
maybe thats whats making the balance seem a little off to me..
Ar_Mi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 01:20 PM   #2
bruinmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sal
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: Patek/Rolex/GS
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
15400 vs. 15500

Nicely done.
Hands down, 15500 for me.
bruinmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 07:24 PM   #3
SpunkyQ8
"TRF" Member
 
SpunkyQ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Aj
Location: Kuwait
Watch: RM,AP,PP,RLX,PAM
Posts: 1,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
15400 vs. 15500

Thanks you!
SpunkyQ8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 11:08 AM   #4
christopheran
"TRF" Member
 
christopheran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Chris
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Watch: AP RO Diver
Posts: 389
The 15400 hour markers look so much better.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
christopheran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 11:13 AM   #5
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
I'm honestly not sure which one I prefer. I like the removal of the 3pm marker on the 15500. Also I like the large "AP" on the 15500.

I'm not sure if this hue of blue is representative of what they look like in real life, and if it is...I still don't know which one I like better. My preference will always be for a lighter, more noticeable blue.

If the 15500 is significantly more expensive, then the 15400 is my preference (assuming I could get either at retail).
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 11:21 AM   #6
Horolojust
"TRF" Member
 
Horolojust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 259
Sihh 2019

154 seems more classic and 155 seems more modern and sport I guess, especially with shorter and thicker hour markers, and black dial perimeter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Horolojust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 11:26 AM   #7
korneevy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Yev
Location: SG/GVA/NYC/MEL ->
Watch: AP, VC, RLX, BP
Posts: 171
15500 is AP's response to Rolex's maxi case (some 10 years later). It looks like a pregnant 15400 carrying twins. Basically, they've now got 1 watch that everyone wants (15202), and the rest is just the garnish to sell it;)
korneevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 12:38 AM   #8
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by korneevy View Post
15500 is AP's response to Rolex's maxi case (some 10 years later). It looks like a pregnant 15400 carrying twins. Basically, they've now got 1 watch that everyone wants (15202), and the rest is just the garnish to sell it;)


That's exactly right, only reason they seem to be keeping it. Only heritage they have left. This is all extremely disappointing to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 11:26 AM   #9
Roger Lococco
"TRF" Member
 
Roger Lococco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Roger Lococco
Location: Asia
Watch: 126719BLRO Pepsi
Posts: 2,980
The new one looks way better in that comparison.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
116500 Daytona White Dial
126710BLNR GMT II
126719BLRO Blue Dial Pepsi GMT II
Roger Lococco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 12:01 PM   #10
Slider817
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: William
Location: New York
Watch: Journe, AP & Lange
Posts: 868
I have the 15400, honestly I don’t have much of a preference between the newer and the older. Thickness change seems like a small ding, but longer power reserve is nice. Aesthetically, both a gorgeous, I would say equal.

Glad to see a change, even though it’s minor.
Slider817 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 12:06 PM   #11
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,356
I’m told there is more to come. Not sure what though.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 01:09 PM   #12
Horolojust
"TRF" Member
 
Horolojust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
I’m told there is more to come. Not sure what though.


Maybe white dial 15500?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Horolojust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 01:17 PM   #13
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horolojust View Post
Maybe white dial 15500?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure! Def an RD2 based perp ultra thin. Almost certainly more offshores.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 12:27 PM   #14
zahain
"TRF" Member
 
zahain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: _
Posts: 586
The new 15500 dial although nice, will i beleive look larger on the wrist trying to portray a 42-43mm look. Some people find the 41mm borderline due to many having small wrists but i'll hold my view until i see one. Couldn't Francois make his new calibre the same size as the existing 3120? 9.8mm to 10.4 seems like a considerable larger case. Why is the 15400 still showing on the website? are they going to produce the 15400 this year and discontinue it next year?


Also, has everyone forgot the RD #2? I'm shocked to see him not come out with the one of the thinnest perpetual calendars and case.

The only thing i really like is the new salmon dial 39mm jumbo. That will sell out extremely quick and it's only a 75 piece
zahain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 12:33 PM   #15
RolexZen
"TRF" Member
 
RolexZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
Yep, I don't think the 15500 is a clear winner over the 15400, or vice-versa, even if price remains the same. I favor certain aspects of each, but both are great watches.

But I wonder if the 15500 being a bit thicker helps differentiate the "Extra Thin" Jumbos?

As far as there being no silver/white 15500, I wonder if that's a product of historic demand numbers on the 15400.
RolexZen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 01:15 PM   #16
zahain
"TRF" Member
 
zahain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: _
Posts: 586
I dont think they will come with a white dial 15500. The white dial has always been the slowest seller even though when i saw one i liked the silvery look to it and more interesting than their black and new grey introduction. They fazed out the rose gold 15400 rose gold on a strap so i dont see them introducing a white dial.
zahain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 01:22 PM   #17
Ar_Mi
"TRF" Member
 
Ar_Mi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Dubai/Los Angeles
Watch: a few
Posts: 595
I really wonder why they would make the rose gold 15500 a limited edition.. perhaps a new dial variant will replace the black in the permanent collection, like how they phased out the black RG ROC?
Ar_Mi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 01:46 PM   #18
Horolojust
"TRF" Member
 
Horolojust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 259


My guess; 15500 has same hour markers as this ROC on right. See the difference of hour markers. Also, the AP logo is bigger on 15500 compared to 15400, so again it should be similar to one as on this ROC.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Horolojust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 01:53 PM   #19
Ichiran
2024 Pledge Member
 
Ichiran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Near beach
Watch: PB1967
Posts: 8,165
Is the new 4302 calibre used in other APs? Is it good?

I previously sold my 15400 due to the large case which doesn't look good on my 6.5 inch wrist. I probably won't buy the new 15500 due to the similar diameter but thicker case.
Ichiran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 02:05 PM   #20
RolexZen
"TRF" Member
 
RolexZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichiran View Post
I previously sold my 15400 due to the large case which doesn't look good on my 6.5 inch wrist. I probably won't buy the new 15500 due to the similar diameter but thicker case.

Well, that sounds prudent.
RolexZen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 06:14 PM   #21
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichiran View Post
Is the new 4302 calibre used in other APs? Is it good?

I previously sold my 15400 due to the large case which doesn't look good on my 6.5 inch wrist. I probably won't buy the new 15500 due to the similar diameter but thicker case.


Is it not a brand new movement from the 11:59 range ?

I felt the 400 wore big on me too, but think the new design will wear smaller on the wrist
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 06:38 PM   #22
mnl
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: sf
Watch: 15450ST
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burlington View Post
Is it not a brand new movement from the 11:59 range ?

I felt the 400 wore big on me too, but think the new design will wear smaller on the wrist


You really think the new one will wear smaller? Even though it is a thicker case at a little over 10mm? I would’ve thought that would make it wear even larger!
mnl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 06:43 PM   #23
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnl View Post
You really think the new one will wear smaller? Even though it is a thicker case at a little over 10mm? I would’ve thought that would make it wear even larger!


I think so yes - but based more on the dial. From the alternating comparison pic which was posted, the bezel seems to have a bit more thickness to it too.

The visual impression for me is that my diver wears smaller than the 15400 did, am assuming the 15500 aesthetics would have a similar effect.

Until it’s tried on though - speculation !
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 02:15 PM   #24
uscmatt99
"TRF" Member
 
uscmatt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,036
Sign me up for the 15500 blue dial. The 15400 is a great watch, but the position of the date aperture has always been the giveaway of a movement too small for the case. I like the proportions on the 15500 much better all around, even if it gains a bit of thickness.
uscmatt99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 02:19 PM   #25
myporsche
"TRF" Member
 
myporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: LA<>NY
Watch: Rolex♠Lange
Posts: 2,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by uscmatt99 View Post
Sign me up for the 15500 blue dial. The 15400 is a great watch, but the position of the date aperture has always been the giveaway of a movement too small for the case. I like the proportions on the 15500 much better all around, even if it gains a bit of thickness.
You bring up a good point - how will they fit this movement in a smaller case if the date is stretched out at the 3.
myporsche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 02:57 PM   #26
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by uscmatt99 View Post
Sign me up for the 15500 blue dial. The 15400 is a great watch, but the position of the date aperture has always been the giveaway of a movement too small for the case. I like the proportions on the 15500 much better all around, even if it gains a bit of thickness.
For sure and I’ve owned and enjoyed a few 15400. I predict these will be really hard to get sadly.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 03:29 PM   #27
Crown & Shield
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: The Alps
Posts: 591
Judging by the date window, the 15500 must have a larger calibre, right?
Crown & Shield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 03:37 PM   #28
Crown & Shield
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: The Alps
Posts: 591
Just checked, 32mm vs. 26,6mm on the 15400.
Crown & Shield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 07:35 PM   #29
SpunkyQ8
"TRF" Member
 
SpunkyQ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Aj
Location: Kuwait
Watch: RM,AP,PP,RLX,PAM
Posts: 1,056
This is the only thing that may stand out IMO. Yet still a reedition of the limited edition 14802.. What R&D did AP do for 2019?
ZILCH!

SpunkyQ8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 04:15 AM   #30
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpunkyQ8 View Post
This is the only thing that may stand out IMO. Yet still a reedition of the limited edition 14802.. What R&D did AP do for 2019?
ZILCH!

This is fantastic... platinum would be better
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.