ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

winged wheel · 8 January 2010, 03:12 AM

Almost looks like a negative mag on the cyclops. Sheesh

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rare-Rolex-Datej...item2304ab1dd6

Name: rlxgold1.jpg
Views: 86
Size: 93.2 KB

Name: rlxgold2.jpg
Views: 86
Size: 96.3 KB

1000ftSub · 8 January 2010, 03:51 AM

BASSETHOUNDS · 8 January 2010, 07:15 AM

Nasty ... BIN PLEASE !

Noonan · 8 January 2010, 07:21 AM

I don't see the issue. It's a lady's model which has a different magnification.

BASSETHOUNDS · 8 January 2010, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noonan

I don't see the issue. It's a lady's model which has a different magnification.

Yes , but it still has a magnification , and no rolex has such a fat date font ...

Noonan · 8 January 2010, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BASSETHOUNDS

Yes , but it still has a magnification , and no rolex has such a fat date font ...

Lady's model DJ's do.

BASSETHOUNDS · 8 January 2010, 07:44 AM

This is a picture of my wife's date just with identical movement , only one year younger then what the other is supposed to be . Sorry for the lousy Iphone picture , but you can clearly see the difference in font .

Noonan · 8 January 2010, 07:47 AM

Is that a lady's size and not a normal 36mm DJ? All of the lady's models I've seen look like the one in the OP.

BASSETHOUNDS · 8 January 2010, 08:11 AM

Ok, ours is 78274 model (mid size ) , I confused with 69xxx model that is the smaller one . I feel a right idiot . See how easy it is to see the wrong things without checking properly . I guess you are right then . Sorry

8 January 2010, 03:12 AM	#1
winged wheel Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Tennessee Posts: 164	Check out this beauty Almost looks like a negative mag on the cyclops. Sheesh http://cgi.ebay.com/Rare-Rolex-Datej...item2304ab1dd6

8 January 2010, 07:44 AM	#7
BASSETHOUNDS Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Tristan Location: GIRONA , SPAIN Watch: 116520/660/710/334 Posts: 7,147	This is a picture of my wife's date just with identical movement , only one year younger then what the other is supposed to be . Sorry for the lousy Iphone picture , but you can clearly see the difference in font . Attached Images

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

8 January 2010, 03:51 AM	#2
1000ftSub "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Orlando Posts: 2,471

8 January 2010, 07:15 AM	#3
BASSETHOUNDS Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Tristan Location: GIRONA , SPAIN Watch: 116520/660/710/334 Posts: 7,147	Nasty ... BIN PLEASE !

8 January 2010, 07:21 AM	#4
Noonan Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: US Watch: 3570.50 Posts: 2,156	I don't see the issue. It's a lady's model which has a different magnification.

8 January 2010, 07:47 AM	#8
Noonan Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: US Watch: 3570.50 Posts: 2,156	Is that a lady's size and not a normal 36mm DJ? All of the lady's models I've seen look like the one in the OP.

8 January 2010, 08:11 AM	#9
BASSETHOUNDS Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Tristan Location: GIRONA , SPAIN Watch: 116520/660/710/334 Posts: 7,147	Ok, ours is 78274 model (mid size ) , I confused with 69xxx model that is the smaller one . I feel a right idiot . See how easy it is to see the wrong things without checking properly . I guess you are right then . Sorry

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)