The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 19 May 2010, 06:56 AM   #1
DiscoPanda
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: Scotland
Posts: 52
Paid a deposit today...

on the new Explorer (214270). Just need to wait till Christmas!

I tried the Explorer 1 and found it too small. The Explorer 2 was the perfect size but I didn't like the look of it on me. Also tried a Milgauss but it was way too big and chunky for me.

The AD assured me that the new Explorer won't be the size of the Milgauss. Is she right? Will it be nearer the size of the Explorer 2?

Anyway, I'm excited!
DiscoPanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2010, 07:13 AM   #2
tulsaokusa
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: N/A
Location: N/A
Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC
Posts: 773
Congrats Philip! It is exciting to order one of the new watches from Rolex's lineup this year.

Cheers,
jason
tulsaokusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2010, 07:16 AM   #3
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
The Milgauss is thicker to be able to hold the movements Faraday cage.

As for diameter... the Explorer II measures just slightly over 39mm, as does the Milgauss - both are advertised as 40mm watches....

I think that you will find the Explorer 39 about the same size but without the thickness, therefore it will be less "chunky."

I doubt that your AD has ever laid eyes on an Explorer 39, so take what they say with a grain of salt..........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2010, 02:02 PM   #4
JMIND
"TRF" Member
 
JMIND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jerry
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 16610 M Series
Posts: 1,084
Congrats; can't wait to see the wrist shot pics!
JMIND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2010, 03:22 PM   #5
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,258
I read the new explorer is 39mm diameter vs. milgauss @ 40mm. I wonder which has a longer case length (lug to lug) or is thicker......the milgauss or new explorer?
Dr. Robert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2010, 05:36 PM   #6
DiscoPanda
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: Scotland
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Robert View Post
I read the new explorer is 39mm diameter vs. milgauss @ 40mm. I wonder which has a longer case length (lug to lug) or is thicker......the milgauss or new explorer?
I'd also like to know this.
DiscoPanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2010, 08:52 PM   #7
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Congrats--now all you have to do is wait!!!!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2010, 01:25 AM   #8
chris russell
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
The Milgauss is 40mm, the new Explorer I is 39mm and thinner.

It will definitely wear smaller on your wrist.
chris russell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2010, 01:33 AM   #9
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Congrats, post photos when you do receive it.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2010, 01:58 AM   #10
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris russell View Post
It will definitely wear smaller on your wrist.


I just posted some thoughts on, among other things, the new Explorer here: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=129955

I didn't try on a Milgauss to directly compare, but I do confirm that it "wears thin"....It's not a bulky watch by any means. And I was very impressed by it.

Congrats on a great choice!! I'm fully confident you're going to LOVE IT.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2010, 07:35 AM   #11
DiscoPanda
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: Scotland
Posts: 52
Thanks all for the feedback.

Cru Jones, I see in your other post that you have an Explorer II. I felt that the ExpII was the perfect fit for my wrist. How does the new Explorer compare in terms of size including the lugs? I really couldn't go any larger than the ExpII. Thanks again.
DiscoPanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2010, 07:39 AM   #12
OYSTERMANN
"TRF" Member
 
OYSTERMANN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
No wonder you're excited, Philip - it will be a great Rolex

Congratulations on reserving your new Explorer!!

Christmas will soon come around.

Welcome to TRF
__________________
Neil

116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007
118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007
116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008
116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009
216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013
116520 SS DAYTONA 2014
OYSTERMANN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.