Should I make the bold move from 16610LV to Sub-C?

[Eric88]

Hey Folks,

This is a fairly commonplace thread and I'm a frequent contributor. The more I sit around and think about watches, the more I think that I should just go for the Sub-C, foregoing my beloved 16610LV and maybe even my GMT Master to make it happen.

I am really more of a one watch kind of guy and think I'd probably be happy with an uber Sub-C vs. a couple of near-misses that keep me thinking, "if only this was x."

What do you think?! Please talk me on or off the ledge. Photos are certainly welcomed.

Regards,
EL

[1000ft]

A sub ceramic no date and I'm content for life.

[esm]

New and old




Vs. Old and new



IMO - the 16610LV is just as a great looking piece as the Sub-C. Yes, the 116610LN has the newer case and more solid bracelet, but that is pretty much it - the ceramic insert isn't all "that" IMO.
So, it's up to you at the end of the day. The good thing is that you can fit a black bezel insert on 16610LV too.

I know I'm not really the right person to ask for a suggestion......

Good luck, can't go wrong either way IMO.

[sleddog]

Well the Subc is definitely a nice piece but I wouldn't lose the LV to get it...
Have you tried on and seen the Subc in person??

[stockae92]

nope, i wouldn't do it

LV is the classic Sub with Maxi dial, the perfect combo :)

[MY-WATCH]

Originally Posted by stockae92

nope, i wouldn't do it

LV is the classic Sub with Maxi dial, the perfect combo :)

x2

the sub-c will be there for a long time while the LV will not
take ur time don't rush

[Hooper]

Originally Posted by my-watch

x2

the sub-c will be there for a long time while the lv will not
take ur time don't rush

x2

[ersnyder]

Originally Posted by MY-WATCH

x2

the sub-c will be there for a long time while the LV will not
take ur time don't rush

Good advice, if you go slow you may not need to flip after the price erodes somwhat. BUT, you should definitely take the plunge and go green!!

[Len]

I would not trade or sell my LV to get the new Sub C. The old LV has an harmonic design, maxi dial and can get all black if you at some time want that. The LV bracelet is not as advanced as the new bracelet, but it has proven its value over time, and does its job..

[Cabaiguan]

Eric, I would definitely do it, buddy. The Sub-C is a fantastic watch. I can easily see it being my only watch if it ever came down to that. The maxi dial, ceramic bezel, chromalight and the glidelock just make this the whole package. You wouldn't regret the swap.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by sleddog1000

Well the Subc is definitely a nice piece but I wouldn't lose the LV to get it...
Have you tried on and seen the Subc in person??

Have to agree and basically the same except for a ceramic insert, different clasp,and slightly restyled case plus quite a price hike.

[Shade]

Try one on before you make the decision..

[Eric88]

Nope, I have tried a few times and no one has had the Sub-C available. I have only seen the seductive photos online. Many of which don't look too much different from my Sub LV with black insert. But I'm still intrigued and that's why I started this thread!

[sleddog]

Originally Posted by Eric88

Nope, I have tried a few times and no one has had the Sub-C available. I have only seen the seductive photos online. Many of which don't look too much different from my Sub LV with black insert. But I'm still intrigued and that's why I started this thread!

Wait till you see it in the flesh before making any rash choices..
Don't get me wrong,it is a beautiful watch IMO....

It is your decision after all and I wish you the best....Just make sure it's the ONE before trading anything!

[timepieceaddict]

I traded my 16610 for 116610 and have not regretted for one minute. Biggest advantage of 116610 is the glide lock (oh so easy and comfortable to adjust) and the ar coating on cyclops.

[steubi1]

Don't do it, you will regret it!

My new SubC is sitting in the box at home and waiting for some wrist time, but it will not happen anymore. The new case design with the wide lugs is not what I like.

I know that there is always this thrill to get rid of something old and get the new. But from my own experience I can tell you: After 2 months I was fed up with the SubC, couldn't stand out anymore....

But in the end, you have to go for what you really like. I know there are many people around that actually like the new design of the case.

And believe me, technically speaking, the new SubC is one perfect watch...

Tom

[le_baroudeur]

the old classic sub is perfect... The LV brings you in addition the maxi dial and the natural green acid touch... Classic case (beautiful because slim) with maxi dial: Don't sell it! (or buy the new to compare for a month before selling the "old" one)

[exxondus]

u need to get the new Sub C or at least, the newer G or alphanumeric older subs/sublv.

the AR on the cyclops is really da bomb imo.

[jameshe]

Originally Posted by steubi1

Don't do it, you will regret it!

My new SubC is sitting in the box at home and waiting for some wrist time, but it will not happen anymore. The new case design with the wide lugs is not what I like.

I know that there is always this thrill to get rid of something old and get the new. But from my own experience I can tell you: After 2 months I was fed up with the SubC, couldn't stand out anymore....

But in the end, you have to go for what you really like. I know there are many people around that actually like the new design of the case.

And believe me, technically speaking, the new SubC is one perfect watch...

Tom

PM me if you want to trade with my 2010 116234 I have up on the FS section

I was waiting to sell to get a sub c here in London

James

[Macro80]

In short...no. Several factors, including recent price increases mean this is an even worse deal for you.

[viper]

I wouldn't do it . The LV is a perfect watch in my opinion .

it's been my daily watch for over 6 years now .

please make sure you see both side by side before you do anything

with the new increase , it just doesn't seem like it's worth all that money IMO

[Art 1]

I would not.

[nauticajoe]

I wouldn't do it.

[toolr]

I wouldn't do it.

[Puffy]

Personally I wouldn't flip two watches to get one

[dalip]

not a chance mate....the LV is perfect..easy to change the insert....and I'm not a fan of the new cases

[Frankie13]

Just wait until you see the the Sub-C in person and then do what your hard tells you!
Good luck!!

[do or die]

Do it, the clasp on its own is worth the upgrade......it is a piece of art.

[bmsermd]

It would be easy for me to say, simply, don't do it.
After all, you're experiencing exactly the dilemma I went through, although I didnt have an LV at the time.
See the Sub-C in person before you even consider this move.
For me the choice became easy one I had both on my wrist.
I fall into the camp of the LV being the perfect, modern Sub.
Wouldnt trade it for anything.

[Danand]

I agree with those that say wait to see it on your wrist. I was considering the old vs the new, waited until my ad had both and could compare them. (actually was able to compare all four- new and old black and green). Having only seen rhpictures previously I was leaning to the old but once I saw them on my wrist it was no contest- I loved the sub c. And yes the bracelet/ clasp are a huge improvement. As a solo daily wearer you can't go wrong with the new one. Good luck with your choice.