The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 October 2010, 02:59 PM   #1
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Should I make the bold move from 16610LV to Sub-C?

Hey Folks,

This is a fairly commonplace thread and I'm a frequent contributor. The more I sit around and think about watches, the more I think that I should just go for the Sub-C, foregoing my beloved 16610LV and maybe even my GMT Master to make it happen.

I am really more of a one watch kind of guy and think I'd probably be happy with an uber Sub-C vs. a couple of near-misses that keep me thinking, "if only this was x."

What do you think?! Please talk me on or off the ledge. Photos are certainly welcomed.

Regards,
EL
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 03:08 PM   #2
1000ft
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Watch: Submariner 14060m
Posts: 45
A sub ceramic no date and I'm content for life.
1000ft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 03:11 PM   #3
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
New and old




Vs. Old and new



IMO - the 16610LV is just as a great looking piece as the Sub-C. Yes, the 116610LN has the newer case and more solid bracelet, but that is pretty much it - the ceramic insert isn't all "that" IMO.
So, it's up to you at the end of the day. The good thing is that you can fit a black bezel insert on 16610LV too.

I know I'm not really the right person to ask for a suggestion......

Good luck, can't go wrong either way IMO.
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 03:14 PM   #4
sleddog
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
sleddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
Well the Subc is definitely a nice piece but I wouldn't lose the LV to get it...
Have you tried on and seen the Subc in person??
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!!

TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..
sleddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 03:17 PM   #5
stockae92
2024 Pledge Member
 
stockae92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,962
nope, i wouldn't do it

LV is the classic Sub with Maxi dial, the perfect combo :)
stockae92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2010, 01:31 AM   #6
MY-WATCH
"TRF" Member
 
MY-WATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockae92 View Post
nope, i wouldn't do it

LV is the classic Sub with Maxi dial, the perfect combo :)

x2

the sub-c will be there for a long time while the LV will not
take ur time don't rush
MY-WATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2010, 01:36 AM   #7
Hooper
"TRF" Member
 
Hooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by my-watch View Post
x2

the sub-c will be there for a long time while the lv will not
take ur time don't rush
x2
Hooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2010, 04:06 AM   #8
ersnyder
2024 Pledge Member
 
ersnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by MY-WATCH View Post
x2

the sub-c will be there for a long time while the LV will not
take ur time don't rush
Good advice, if you go slow you may not need to flip after the price erodes somwhat. BUT, you should definitely take the plunge and go green!!

ersnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2010, 04:53 AM   #9
Len
"TRF" Member
 
Len's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Hans Henrik
Location: EU, Denmark
Posts: 184
I would not trade or sell my LV to get the new Sub C. The old LV has an harmonic design, maxi dial and can get all black if you at some time want that. The LV bracelet is not as advanced as the new bracelet, but it has proven its value over time, and does its job..
Len is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2010, 11:14 AM   #10
Cabaiguan
"TRF" Member
 
Cabaiguan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Raf
Location: NJ
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 2,155
Eric, I would definitely do it, buddy. The Sub-C is a fantastic watch. I can easily see it being my only watch if it ever came down to that. The maxi dial, ceramic bezel, chromalight and the glidelock just make this the whole package. You wouldn't regret the swap.
Cabaiguan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 10:33 PM   #11
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleddog1000 View Post
Well the Subc is definitely a nice piece but I wouldn't lose the LV to get it...
Have you tried on and seen the Subc in person??
Have to agree and basically the same except for a ceramic insert, different clasp,and slightly restyled case plus quite a price hike.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 10:47 PM   #12
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Try one on before you make the decision..
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 03:17 PM   #13
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Nope, I have tried a few times and no one has had the Sub-C available. I have only seen the seductive photos online. Many of which don't look too much different from my Sub LV with black insert. But I'm still intrigued and that's why I started this thread!
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 03:21 PM   #14
sleddog
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
sleddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post
Nope, I have tried a few times and no one has had the Sub-C available. I have only seen the seductive photos online. Many of which don't look too much different from my Sub LV with black insert. But I'm still intrigued and that's why I started this thread!
Wait till you see it in the flesh before making any rash choices..
Don't get me wrong,it is a beautiful watch IMO....

It is your decision after all and I wish you the best....Just make sure it's the ONE before trading anything!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!!

TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..
sleddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 04:30 PM   #15
timepieceaddict
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sussex, UK
Watch: 116520, Pam 312
Posts: 286
I traded my 16610 for 116610 and have not regretted for one minute. Biggest advantage of 116610 is the glide lock (oh so easy and comfortable to adjust) and the ar coating on cyclops.
timepieceaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 04:44 PM   #16
steubi1
"TRF" Member
 
steubi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Switzerland
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,150
Don't do it, you will regret it!

My new SubC is sitting in the box at home and waiting for some wrist time, but it will not happen anymore. The new case design with the wide lugs is not what I like.

I know that there is always this thrill to get rid of something old and get the new. But from my own experience I can tell you: After 2 months I was fed up with the SubC, couldn't stand out anymore....

But in the end, you have to go for what you really like. I know there are many people around that actually like the new design of the case.

And believe me, technically speaking, the new SubC is one perfect watch...

Tom
steubi1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 04:59 PM   #17
le_baroudeur
"TRF" Member
 
le_baroudeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rennes, FRANCE
Posts: 802
the old classic sub is perfect... The LV brings you in addition the maxi dial and the natural green acid touch... Classic case (beautiful because slim) with maxi dial: Don't sell it! (or buy the new to compare for a month before selling the "old" one)
le_baroudeur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 05:56 PM   #18
exxondus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 568
u need to get the new Sub C or at least, the newer G or alphanumeric older subs/sublv.

the AR on the cyclops is really da bomb imo.
exxondus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 08:05 PM   #19
jameshe
"TRF" Member
 
jameshe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: AP ROC, SkyDweller
Posts: 812
Quote:
Originally Posted by steubi1 View Post
Don't do it, you will regret it!

My new SubC is sitting in the box at home and waiting for some wrist time, but it will not happen anymore. The new case design with the wide lugs is not what I like.

I know that there is always this thrill to get rid of something old and get the new. But from my own experience I can tell you: After 2 months I was fed up with the SubC, couldn't stand out anymore....

But in the end, you have to go for what you really like. I know there are many people around that actually like the new design of the case.

And believe me, technically speaking, the new SubC is one perfect watch...

Tom
PM me if you want to trade with my 2010 116234 I have up on the FS section

I was waiting to sell to get a sub c here in London

James
jameshe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 06:18 PM   #20
Macro80
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 248
In short...no. Several factors, including recent price increases mean this is an even worse deal for you.
Macro80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 06:41 PM   #21
viper
"TRF" Member
 
viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 943
I wouldn't do it . The LV is a perfect watch in my opinion .

it's been my daily watch for over 6 years now .

please make sure you see both side by side before you do anything

with the new increase , it just doesn't seem like it's worth all that money IMO
__________________
16610LV
16200
116600
116500
viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 08:33 PM   #22
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
I would not.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 09:11 PM   #23
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
I wouldn't do it.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 09:26 PM   #24
toolr
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northwest
Posts: 1,369
I wouldn't do it.
toolr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 09:44 PM   #25
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
Personally I wouldn't flip two watches to get one
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 09:46 PM   #26
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
not a chance mate....the LV is perfect..easy to change the insert....and I'm not a fan of the new cases
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 10:01 PM   #27
Frankie13
2024 Pledge Member
 
Frankie13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: US
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 434
Just wait until you see the the Sub-C in person and then do what your hard tells you!
Good luck!!
Frankie13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 10:31 PM   #28
do or die
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: tatustu
Location: Scotland
Watch: SubC ExpII
Posts: 95
Do it, the clasp on its own is worth the upgrade......it is a piece of art.
Attached Images
 
do or die is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 10:26 PM   #29
bmsermd
"TRF" Member
 
bmsermd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Brant
Location: YYZ
Watch: 16610 LV (V......)
Posts: 101
It would be easy for me to say, simply, don't do it.
After all, you're experiencing exactly the dilemma I went through, although I didnt have an LV at the time.
See the Sub-C in person before you even consider this move.
For me the choice became easy one I had both on my wrist.
I fall into the camp of the LV being the perfect, modern Sub.
Wouldnt trade it for anything.
bmsermd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2010, 10:29 PM   #30
Danand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
I agree with those that say wait to see it on your wrist. I was considering the old vs the new, waited until my ad had both and could compare them. (actually was able to compare all four- new and old black and green). Having only seen rhpictures previously I was leaning to the old but once I saw them on my wrist it was no contest- I loved the sub c. And yes the bracelet/ clasp are a huge improvement. As a solo daily wearer you can't go wrong with the new one. Good luck with your choice.
Danand is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.