ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 January 2011, 02:17 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: RG DD40
Posts: 1,149
|
HELP First Watch, Date Just 36mm SS or Explorer 1
im looking to purchase my first watch and im 20. im in between a DJ SS and an explorer 1, im looking to wear it with pretty much everything... i just want to know what you all think of each watch and what you recommend especially as it is going to be my first watch. thank you.
|
15 January 2011, 02:22 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
I would go for the 39mm Explorer.
It's a bit more modern size-wise and the brushed bracelet makes it better to wear with everything, it's less formal and you can beat it all day without it showing it. It's brand new so it won't change for a while, not that Rolex changes watches very often though... Try them both on and see for yourself.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
15 January 2011, 02:37 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
I have both the 114270 and the 116200 and I like them both very much. It's a very hard choice, as they both have a lot going for them.
They are very similar, yet very different and equally rugged. It's entirely a matter of choice. The Explorer is more sporty, while the DJ is more dressy, but either would work for dressy occasions. I just saw the 214270 for the first time the other day. Personally, I prefer the 114270, but I can see the appeal of the 214270. It's larger size brings the Explorer more into line with the other watches in the professional series. Just looking at the watch in the case with the Explorer II, the Subs, and the GMTs, you can see plainly that the 214270 is in its element. On the wrist, it has a definite presence that the 114270 or the 116200 cannot match. The watch dominated my 7.67" wrist. It will certainly appeal to the younger crowd who has practically grown up with the larger watches, yet it does not have the proportion of watches that will look grotesque in a few years as fashion changes. Which ever you choose, you won't go wrong, but I can almost assure you that which ever you choose, you will not be satisfied and will as soon as you are able, buy yourself another Rolex and then another and on and on. You're starting young, so there's a lot to look forward to.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
15 January 2011, 02:39 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
If you want a date feature and many dial options go with the DJ. If not, the EXP is a classic.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
15 January 2011, 02:40 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: RG DD40
Posts: 1,149
|
you just confused the F out of me with all those codes for watches.... seriously.
|
15 January 2011, 02:42 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manila
Posts: 1,177
|
Between the two, I would take the DJ SS on fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet with big roman dial.
If I may ad an option, the 16610 would be a great first Rolex. However, at the end of the day, you cant go wrong with either, including the 16610.
__________________
18083 & 16750 16234 & 16233 16610 & 16800 3717-01 & 104 & 312 Nav B-Uhr |
15 January 2011, 09:14 PM | #7 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
Quote:
http://www.melrosejewelers.com/model...ence-chart.htm Take a look at these. There are three numbers of importance to you: 1. model number or case number 2. serial number 3. caliber number. The model or case number tells you just that, and an indication of age. Serial number, enables you to check if the watch has been stolen, and age. Caliber no. tells you the type of movement in the watch. There is a 4th number, COST. A very important number indeed. Let's make it simple: for a first Rolex: stainless steel(ss) submariner date.....5 or 6 years old can be bought from a trusted seller here on TRF, thousands of dollars less than a new one. For trusted sellers there's a section on this Forum. Of course, you must always get references. Good luck! |
|
15 January 2011, 10:07 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melb - Australia
Posts: 2,959
|
Exp I for me
|
15 January 2011, 10:21 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Gary
Location: Bozeman, MT
Watch: 126508 Paul Newman
Posts: 7,835
|
My vote would be the Explorer. I think it is great for every setting and a little bigger than the DJ.
|
15 January 2011, 11:40 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,472
|
The Explorer is a classic. If you can, try both sizes to see what is a better fit for you.
The DJ has the advantage of the date. Also many dial and bracelet and bezel choices. What appeals to you at 20 may change over time in terms of the combo so think long term and I recommend going simple and classic (I like a stick dial). Take your time and enjoy the process. I also recommend the TRF Trusted Sellers. |
16 January 2011, 03:44 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,297
|
datejust.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
16 January 2011, 10:06 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Explorer 1, for me.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
16 January 2011, 10:18 AM | #13 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Quote:
Google is your friend. The reference numbers aren't necessary in most discussions, but they do make it easy when discussing some models as a shorthand for the full names. 114270 the last of the 36mm Explorers 214270 the new 39mm Explorer 116200 the newer, larger, polished case DateJust in SS with the domed bezel.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
16 January 2011, 10:30 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
TT datejust with jubilee bracelet & stick dial ( I prefer the champagne dial myself),many dials to choose from & it looks great with a suit or casual with a Tshirt & jeans.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
16 January 2011, 01:39 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Erik
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 116234, 116710LN
Posts: 936
|
The DateJust is the classic Rolex. It also has the date function that I find to be a must in a watch. The new 39mm Explorer in nice, but if you have to have the date it's a dealbreaker. I'd go for the DateJust. I did and I have no regrets whatsoever!
__________________
Submariner 116610LN - Black Dial & Stainless Steel DateJust 116234 - White Stick Dial & Roulette Wheel GMT-Master II 116710LN - Black Dial & Green "Fouth Hand" |
9 July 2016, 07:24 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
interesting ,,, same choice , after google the views up pops this old thread again , both holding the same price now , i guess the only difference is the date function , and the bracelet ,, ah lifes choices ,
but great to see when you start to research trf is right at the top of the results. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.