The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Watch Gallery

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 June 2007, 08:03 AM   #1
RLXGMT-1675
"TRF" Member
 
RLXGMT-1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 8
Icon20 Check out my ~40yr GMT 1675 after complete rehaul

Hi guys,

I'm very much new to this forum. I'm also new to owning Rolex and even newer at photographing Rolex!

My father recently gave me his vintage 1965 GMT-Master.
Details are as follows:
Case ref: 1675
Caliber 1575GMT (non-quickset)
Case serial: 1820XXX
Dial: Matte Black
Bracelet: 93150 with 580 end-pieces (a sub bracelet)
Prior service date: sometime in June 1987(!)

After 20 years without a service, merely washing my hands wearing it resulted in immediate water ingress. Not wasting a minute I took it to the RSC and requested:

New dial (the old tritium dial had lost its luminosity)
New hands (same as above)
New bezel insert
New acrylic crystal
Full movement service and calibration
Bracelet and case refinish
____________________________
Grand total: Euro 515 (~692.754 USD)

I know, I know, damn expensive but I live in Europe so everything is more expensive here!

Take a look at the pictures too:










I must say, photographing a watch is MUCH more difficult than it seems. After having taken about 80 images, only the 4 shown are actually any good. Either my camera sucks or I do.
On the same note, I noticed that using the flash on close-ups reveals little scratches and even dust(!) which really spoils the pic.

Guys, tell me what you think about this marvellous 40yr old watch.
I am only 23!
RLXGMT-1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 08:10 AM   #2
C.J.
"TRF" Member
 
C.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: *
Posts: 10,196
That's a damn fine watch with a lot of sentiment behind it Congratulations and welcome to TRF
__________________
Me? I'm still looking for Kokomo. I just hope that damn golfer isn't there
C.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 08:26 AM   #3
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Congrats on a lovely and 100% functional 1675. Heirlooms are always the most special as the sentamental value of these pieces are priceless.
Do take the time to learn all the stories you can as to what this watch has seen over the years and always cherish the memories!
The photos are fantastic! Well done!!
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 09:19 AM   #4
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Congrats on a great watch and welcome to TRF.

With Rolex you might try approaching it at an angle with your camera. The crystals do tend to bounce light.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 09:58 AM   #5
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,191
A freakin great looking watch! I agree with Mike, I would ask your dad if there are any interesting stories about the GMT after all those years. AND WRITE THEM DOWN for your son to enjoy when he takes ownership of that beautiful Swiss timepiece.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 09:59 AM   #6
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,191
Oh, forgot, nice photos too.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 10:11 AM   #7
RLXGMT-1675
"TRF" Member
 
RLXGMT-1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 8
thanks for all your kind words everybody.

I have a couple of questions and I'm wondering if anybody knows the answers:
1) To what depth is this watch water resistant to?
2) There is a slight rattle caused by non SEL bracelet. Is it possible to fit an SEL bracelet on older GMT-Masters?
3) Did Rolex use 904L steel on vintage watches or 316L?

I'm just very curious to find out as much as I can about the technology behind such fine timepieces.
Couple that with a few great stories for which I'll be asking my dad soon and I've got a lot more than just a watch on my wrist every day!
RLXGMT-1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 10:17 AM   #8
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by RLXGMT-1675 View Post
thanks for all your kind words everybody.

I have a couple of questions and I'm wondering if anybody knows the answers:
1) To what depth is this watch water resistant to?
2) There is a slight rattle caused by non SEL bracelet. Is it possible to fit an SEL bracelet on older GMT-Masters?

Thanks for your responses.
1. 50 meters
2. the rattle is normal, all non-sels will do that to one extent or another.
I don't think you can on that reference.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 10:40 AM   #9
KJacques
"TRF" Member
 
KJacques's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: USA
Watch: the skies
Posts: 1,250
That is a great looking watch, which will mean so much to you in the years to come. I have an old vintage that I'm waiting to come back from service that I mostly took for granted. Seeing those pictures gives me an appreciation of vintage Rolex so I'm looking forward to getting mine back now.

Kevin
KJacques is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 11:02 AM   #10
mikey
"TRF" Member
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
Excellent
mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 03:59 PM   #11
coltex
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 21
Beautiful vintage timepiece, worth every cent in servicing!
coltex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 08:59 PM   #12
mailman
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
Welcome to TRF What an entrance. That's a beautiful watch and something to cherish for a lifetime.
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 09:18 PM   #13
Flyjet601
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
Whoaaaa!

Gorgeous....

Take care of that baby
Flyjet601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 09:59 PM   #14
problmchylde
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: PETER
Location: Singapore
Watch: 1665 SD
Posts: 768
Don't care what the hardcore/purist vintage collectors say....i think the new luminova replacement dials look FANTASTIC Beautiful watch indeed
problmchylde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2007, 10:28 PM   #15
yongkim
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Day Date
Posts: 19
Beautiful timepiece. I too took a ton of pics of my watch and less than 1% were suitable for posting. It is tougher than it looks to take nice pics. Awesome history behind the watch I'm sure. I just got my rollie and plan on giving it to my son when he reaches the right age. Congrats!
yongkim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 02:17 AM   #16
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,088
Looks amazing, Like it was bought just yesterday
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 02:52 AM   #17
Earl
"TRF" Member
 
Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Who Me?
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: out
Posts: 4,616
RLXGMT, Congratulations and wear in with pride :o)
Earl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 08:19 AM   #18
khergert
"TRF" Member
 
khergert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 9
You did not overspend in your rehab. I spent more with an independent guy I've delt with for over 20 years. I finally allowed them to redo the spider webbed dial, now line 2 says OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE. When I ask about it, they argue how the 3 words are right. Spent more, got less, I only go to the Rolex Repair Center for all work now.
khergert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 09:44 AM   #19
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by RLXGMT-1675 View Post
thanks for all your kind words everybody.

I have a couple of questions and I'm wondering if anybody knows the answers:
1) To what depth is this watch water resistant to?
2) There is a slight rattle caused by non SEL bracelet. Is it possible to fit an SEL bracelet on older GMT-Masters?
3) Did Rolex use 904L steel on vintage watches or 316L?

I'm just very curious to find out as much as I can about the technology behind such fine timepieces.
Couple that with a few great stories for which I'll be asking my dad soon and I've got a lot more than just a watch on my wrist every day!
OK, (I swear I didn't see #3 the first time --I love those senior moments! )

Your GMT-Master uses 316L. 904 did not make it's debut untill the reference 168000 circa 1988-89.
I belive you mentioned the watch carried a 1.8 mil. ser.no. It should have the 1575 slow beat movement (19,800bph)
Of course non-hacking, non-quick-set. Since it's a 1675 the "stack" of the hands will be as follows:
24 hr., 12hr. minute, second.

1675,


This is different than the "newer" 16750 which introduced the quick-set feature to the GMT line which puts the 12 hr. hand on the bottom then the 24 hr. minute and second

16750 (WG surrounds)


Earlier 16750 matt,


While the dials appear similiar, they are NOT interchangable due to different placement of the dial feet to accomodate the newer fast beat movement of the 16750.

Orginally introduced circa 1960, the GMT-MASTER reference 1675 was the only sport model to have been sold with a jubilee bracelet option. (early 70s)
additionally, while first introduced with the classic Red/Blue insert, the 1675 was the first GMT to sport an all black insert.

The GMT has a long an storied history, being a favored watch of Military and Police during the 60s and 70s. Many say the GMT was the favored watch of the orginal NASA astronauts. While the GMT never landed on the moon, it's well documented that Col. Jack Swigert wore one on Apollo 13. That watch now rests in the Rolex museum with an inscription from the Col. saying "Thank you for getting me there on time"
http://www.secondtimeround.biz/histo...mt_master.html

The 1675 was the first watch I ever bought. I still have it and while I've been fortunate enough to have added a couple more nice pieces over the years, it's my most cherished piece!
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 10:33 AM   #20
RLXGMT-1675
"TRF" Member
 
RLXGMT-1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
OK, (I swear I didn't see #3 the first time --I love those senior moments! )

Your GMT-Master uses 316L. 904 did not make it's debut untill the reference 168000 circa 1988-89.
I belive you mentioned the watch carried a 1.8 mil. ser.no. It should have the 1575 slow beat movement (19,800bph)
Of course non-hacking, non-quick-set. Since it's a 1675 the "stack" of the hands will be as follows:
24 hr., 12hr. minute, second.
Mike,

Its my fault, kinda. I edited my original post after you replied to it which is why you missed my 3rd point.

Take a look at this pic:


On this pic we see the caseback of a 1970 GMT 1675. It shows clear signs of pitting/rust/corrosion. Now admittedly some watches are better taken care of than others.

I am aware that 904L steel is pretty much an example of Rolex overdesigning their watches "Because we can".

Are you aware of, say, your own watch having such corrosion issues? I was pretty much under the impression SS doesn't corrode when not exposed to sour/sulphide/hydrogen sulphate environments.

And a question for anyone who has dabbled in vintage watches, regardless of brand.
How long does a mechanical watch last?

Mine is certainly in great shape but do you guys reckon my swiss timepiece can actually last, say, another 40 yrs. That would be a grand total of 80yrs.

Frankly, I'm quite surprised Rolex achieved all this back in the 60's without the aid of CAD and immensely fast personal computers!

Just imagine how spectacular their modern watches are if their 40yr old models are this good!
RLXGMT-1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 10:39 AM   #21
RLXGMT-1675
"TRF" Member
 
RLXGMT-1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by khergert View Post
You did not overspend in your rehab. I spent more with an independent guy I've delt with for over 20 years. I finally allowed them to redo the spider webbed dial, now line 2 says OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE. When I ask about it, they argue how the 3 words are right. Spent more, got less, I only go to the Rolex Repair Center for all work now.
You're quite right. Who knows what kinds of things go on behind the scenes at non-official SCs. They certainly don't have the legendary Rolex name to uphold when they get on with their day to day business.

That's not to say thet there are no honest people in this business but frankly, even hearing that some unscrupulous watch tecnicians/repairmen will go to the trouble of e.g. converting SS DJs into TT DJs by adding original+non-original aftermarket spare parts is enough to put me off them for good.

You pay a bit more but in the end you get more. It seems that is very much a fact of life.
RLXGMT-1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 11:41 AM   #22
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by RLXGMT-1675 View Post
Mike,

Its my fault, kinda. I edited my original post after you replied to it which is why you missed my 3rd point.

Take a look at this pic:


On this pic we see the caseback of a 1970 GMT 1675. It shows clear signs of pitting/rust/corrosion. Now admittedly some watches are better taken care of than others.

I am aware that 904L steel is pretty much an example of Rolex overdesigning their watches "Because we can".

Are you aware of, say, your own watch having such corrosion issues? I was pretty much under the impression SS doesn't corrode when not exposed to sour/sulphide/hydrogen sulphate environments.

And a question for anyone who has dabbled in vintage watches, regardless of brand.
How long does a mechanical watch last?

Mine is certainly in great shape but do you guys reckon my swiss timepiece can actually last, say, another 40 yrs. That would be a grand total of 80yrs.

Frankly, I'm quite surprised Rolex achieved all this back in the 60's without the aid of CAD and immensely fast personal computers!

Just imagine how spectacular their modern watches are if their 40yr old models are this good!
Yeah, I've seen corrosion like that before. I've been pretty picky with the pieces I've selected if bought pre-owned. Pitting and corrosion are two things I look for (among other things).
My experience is that this comes from a lack of care and maintance. Many of these fine timepieces were certainly used in the manner in which they were designed, but I constantly read reports and posts of " I haven't serviced my watch in X number of years". Any steel, whether 316, 904, or some other type WILL show signs of pitting and corrosion if some program of maintanceis not followed.
Witness the corrosion and pitting problems Rolex had with hand sets of 50s 60s 70s and some 80s vintage pieces (not to mention the dial) that can be traced to little or no maintance--servicing, changing gaskets, crystals, etc... allowing moisture to enter the timepiece.

It's my belief that with proper maintance and correct parts there's no practical limit to the life span of a vintage piece. I'm aware of some VERY serious collectors with pieces approaching 80 and 90 years of age that are not only worn on a regular basis but keep time within chronometer specs.

The oldest piece in my stable is a GMT gilt dial bearing a 1.3 mil number. This watch is accurate to within LESS than +1 sec. a day. It has been used, but cared for, and still has it's orginal dial and hands,


Close up of dial.


I know the modern 3xxx fast beat movements are tough accurate movements, but I'm of the camp that just feels the 15xx movements were over engineered monsters that just absorbed tremendous punishment and never looked back.
Watchmakers whom I respect feel the the human engineering that went into these movements simply put them in a different league. I'm not a watchmaker, but I know from years of real world experience these are unbeliveable movements.
My most accurate watch is this "old sub" that saw the bad side of Vietnam. It runs at +/- 0 deviation.

mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 11:51 AM   #23
mikey
"TRF" Member
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
My watch is a product of the SS to TT conversion and I love it. Paying more for the same thing makes no sense!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Monster DJ.jpg (65.3 KB, 589 views)
mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 12:36 PM   #24
RLXGMT-1675
"TRF" Member
 
RLXGMT-1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
Yeah, I've seen corrosion like that before. I've been pretty picky with the pieces I've selected if bought pre-owned. Pitting and corrosion are two things I look for (among other things).
My experience is that this comes from a lack of care and maintance. Many of these fine timepieces were certainly used in the manner in which they were designed, but I constantly read reports and posts of " I haven't serviced my watch in X number of years". Any steel, whether 316, 904, or some other type WILL show signs of pitting and corrosion if some program of maintanceis not followed.
Witness the corrosion and pitting problems Rolex had with hand sets of 50s 60s 70s and some 80s vintage pieces (not to mention the dial) that can be traced to little or no maintance--servicing, changing gaskets, crystals, etc... allowing moisture to enter the timepiece.

It's my belief that with proper maintance and correct parts there's no practical limit to the life span of a vintage piece. I'm aware of some VERY serious collectors with pieces approaching 80 and 90 years of age that are not only worn on a regular basis but keep time within chronometer specs.

The oldest piece in my stable is a GMT gilt dial bearing a 1.3 mil number. This watch is accurate to within LESS than +1 sec. a day. It has been used, but cared for, and still has it's orginal dial and hands,


Close up of dial.


I know the modern 3xxx fast beat movements are tough accurate movements, but I'm of the camp that just feels the 15xx movements were over engineered monsters that just absorbed tremendous punishment and never looked back.
Watchmakers whom I respect feel the the human engineering that went into these movements simply put them in a different league. I'm not a watchmaker, but I know from years of real world experience these are unbeliveable movements.
My most accurate watch is this "old sub" that saw the bad side of Vietnam. It runs at +/- 0 deviation.

Damn fine watch that 1.3 mil GMT!

As far as maintenance I am of the opinion that a movement service/dissassembly is required every 5-6 years but that a case refinish should be put of for every 2 services as, especially on vintage pieces, you don't want to overpolish the case.

As far as collectors operating 80yr timepieces, what can I say. I am stunned.

These are exactly the kinds of things one should say to the many who first-hand reject the very notion of expensive, quality timepieces with the usual line "A 10$ Timex will show the time just as well"...
RLXGMT-1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 10:29 PM   #25
RLXGMT-1675
"TRF" Member
 
RLXGMT-1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey View Post
My watch is a product of the SS to TT conversion and I love it. Paying more for the same thing makes no sense!
Mikey,

My comments were not against any Rolex owner, such as yourself, from doing whatever one wants with something one legally owns.

The issue is when certain people in the watch trading/repair/service industry misrepresent such items and neglecting to mention their history, i.e. how they started out.
RLXGMT-1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 10:32 PM   #26
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,510
Absolutely Amazing Rolex and the PIX are excellent.

Thank you Mike (and others) for the history and the details of this one. I could sit and read it over and over.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 10:44 PM   #27
RLXGMT-1675
"TRF" Member
 
RLXGMT-1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 8
Mike,

Thanks a bunch for all that great info.

This place is truly a treasure chest of info on our shared passion, Rolex watches!

I am very proud to be a member of TRF and look forward to posting pics of:
1) An OQ 19018 (1987)
2) Rose TT DJ 1601 (1967)
in due course.

Thanks for everybody's responses!
RLXGMT-1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2007, 10:46 PM   #28
RLXGMT-1675
"TRF" Member
 
RLXGMT-1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 8
Mikey,

My comments were not against any Rolex owner, such as yourself, doing whatever one wants with something one legally owns.

The issue is when certain people in the watch trading/repair/service industry misrepresent such watches and neglect to mention their history & subsequent "transformation" when they are reselling them.
RLXGMT-1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 June 2007, 12:04 AM   #29
Rockrolex
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Rockrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,955
RLXGMT, that is one beautiful vintage GMT. She cleans up real nice, too.

Wear it in good health. With proper maintenance, it should last for several lifetimes.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular.

Tosser Cabinet Member

Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
Rockrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2007, 08:56 PM   #30
givenup
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: dave
Location: london
Watch: sea dweller
Posts: 55
lucky boy. money well spent. give it another 40years of love.
givenup is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.