ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 July 2011, 03:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: Daytona, Explorer
Posts: 218
|
176 Question
I have been thinking about a 176 or177 but have not been able to see one in person. My question is this - does a 176 or 177 wear "smaller" than other 44mm models. I am wondering this because it seems to me that watches with a matte type finish sometimes appear smaller than a similarly sized watch with a more polished look. Anyone with any thoughts on this? Truth is I would prefer the smaller look but would still like to try something larger than a 40mm. If there are any other recommendations of 44mm Pams that might wear smaller I would love to know. Thanks for any opinions on this.
|
4 July 2011, 03:11 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
The titanium is same size as regular luminors but I would opined that they feel about 30% lighter so it wears taper(will not hang) to the wrist and feels more snug. In every panerai collection, there should always be a TI.
Good luck with your choice! Best, Fred/NYC |
4 July 2011, 03:40 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
They look the same to me, but the subtle hue of the brushed titanium is more modest and less blingy hence making it less noticeable - but not necessarily appear smaller. Though it does feel alot lighter!
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
4 July 2011, 05:35 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,297
|
no, i don't think it "looks" smaller, and, to me, it doesn't weight THAT much lighter, either (mostly b/c i don't think either SS or titanium luminors are particularly heavy).
comes down to personal preference. between all-polished and titanium, i prefer the brighter all-polished to the duller (imo) titanium. ultimately, all-polished was a bit much for me, so, i went brushed case + polished bezel (164). |
4 July 2011, 06:18 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Barry
Location: california
Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI
Posts: 1,289
|
I use to have a 177 and I have a 312!!
From that I can tell you that the 177 is lighter. But size wise it's the same.
__________________
|
5 July 2011, 04:34 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: Daytona, Explorer
Posts: 218
|
thanks for the help!! I am leaning to the 176. From what I understand some years are painted dial and some sandwich. Is there a specific year or serial when they go from one to the other?
|
5 July 2011, 08:24 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
Great choice! I do not find the 177 to wear smaller than my 000, but I do find it to be much more comfortable especially for long periods of time. I also prefer the darker brushed appearance, which gives it a more casual look with the right strap. Perfect PAM for summer!
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
5 July 2011, 10:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Nice shot Charles!
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
5 July 2011, 11:10 AM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
Quote:
The painted dial stopped at the 176G series.. so if you still prefer a titanium with a painted dial, there are the 55 and 116 but those, are slightly harder to find and comes at a premium. Good luck with your decision. Sandwich or painted, both winners. Best, Fred/NYC |
|
5 July 2011, 11:36 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
Here is a titanium with painted dial in a 118. The brownish tone serves as a great contrast vs. the painted numeral markers:
|
5 July 2011, 12:08 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Fred! How many pams do you have? Lol..
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
5 July 2011, 01:45 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: Daytona, Explorer
Posts: 218
|
Those are both GORGEOUS watches. Now I may be leaning toward the 177. Something tells me I can't go wrong. Thanks again for the info!!
|
6 July 2011, 10:15 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
|
14 July 2011, 10:07 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: kansas city
Posts: 16
|
Exact same size, just lighter weight.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.