Be honest, your Sub/DS's Glidelock...

[Megalobyte]

I love, love, did I mention love, my Sub C. I do feel it offers significant improvements over the 16610. One of the big ones I was really looking forward to was the Glidelock. I live in hot, humid FL, I frequently find my watches a little too loose, then when I'm hot and sweaty it's almost too snug. So, I thought the Glidelock was like a godsend, couldn't wait to use it.

Trouble is, I never do. I'm not sure why, other than I haven't felt the need. Though my wrist does swell at times, the bracelet still feels ok, when it gets loose, it's not really so loose I need to make it tighter.

I don't know, I truly expected to use it all the time, and I just don't.

Anybody else find this to be the case?

[tkc324]

I dont have the Sub c, however I do have the Daytona and GMT2c, both with easy link. I have used the half link almost everytime the weather gets hot and humid. Partially, its probably because I wear my watch very snug, I can barely fit my pinky thru the bracelete. If you dont wear your watch that snug, I dont think your wrist can swell that much to require the glidelock.

[Eric88]

Personally, I found it to be more of a novelty or thing to fiddle with out of boredom. The classic flip lock does everything I need.

[Dan2010]

Had 2 Sub Cs and found the glidelock great but the easy link on my GMTIIC just as useful in reality. Both are more comfotable than the old bracelets in my opinion.

[xjeeunitx]

I use the glidelock almost everyday as my wrist changes in size constantly. I make changes up to three micro adjustments depending on the situation so it's definitely a benefit for me. The regular flip-lock or DJ/GMT2C clasp are decent but the glidelock seals the deal for me in clasps for ALL watches. Notice I said all.

[Sherwooddavid]

I love the glidelock on my Sub C. Use it all the time.

[Danand]

Originally Posted by Sherwooddavid

I love the glidelock on my Sub C. Use it all the time.

X2.

[clarencek]

I don't use it either. The value for me was that it let me get just the right fit - not tight when it's cold and not tight when it's hot. I don't have a watch that fits better thanks to the glidelock.

[sirjohnbrian]

Before losing a lot of weight from dieting, I used the glidelock on my DSSD all the time. Usually, I would adjust it about 1 or 2 notches.

For diving with a wetsuit, it is indispensable.

[DCgator]

I have to ask this question related to this subject and would appreciate feedback from those of you with the knowledge - are the glidelock clasp on the Subc and Deepsea inter-changeable? I have a Deepsea but not a Subc. I am asking because the clasp on the Deepsea is too long for me. If the clasp on the Subc is shorter and would fit on a Deepsea I'd rather wear a shorter clasp. Thanks!

[MortgageGuy]

Originally Posted by clarencek

I don't use it either. The value for me was that it let me get just the right fit - not tight when it's cold and not tight when it's hot. I don't have a watch that fits better thanks to the glidelock.

X2, I have used it but very rarely. I do like being able to get just a perfect fit with it in just seconds Not a deal maker for me but it is nice. The old tinny basic Rolex clasp that has been around for decades has never failed me and works perfectly IMHO too

[jenniferjanef]

I own both the subc and he dssd. In terms of the 'glidelock' they are almost totally different thing. I mean, the function of the glide lock on the sub is almost "brutal" when compared to the dssd 'fluid' when in the operation of the lock.. You really need to try them out and compare them. Thus, I hardly ever adjust the lock on my subc.. I find the easy lock is a lot easier to operate and use it very often on my gmt2c. To sums it up, after I have been so used to my dssd, I just don't like the glide lock system on my subc. I feel it is not the real deal, and some how a 'discounted' version of the real glide lock system. .. James

[dddrees]

I also only have the easy link, and I rarely use it. But it is nice knowing I have that option.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by Eric88

Personally, I found it to be more of a novelty or thing to fiddle with out of boredom. The classic flip lock does everything I need.

Have to agree myself worked around the middle and far east for many years as a dive guide, and PADI/BSAC instructor.Never ever had any problems with both of my fliplock watches, and both watches have seen quite a bit of abuse over many years underwater and on surface in very high and very humid temperatures.

[nGage7962]

I don't have a Sub-C but I use the glidelock on my DSSD all the time and as for the comfort aspect mentioned above, it is extremely comfortable on my wrist and I don't find the clasp too long. I guess it just depends on the shape and size, but the glidelock enables the most comfortable fit of any watch i have owned.

[never2late]

I use my sub C glide lock quite a lot as my wrist swells in the heat. It makes things much easier for me.

[rogerrabbit168]

I have the DSSD, don't find the need to use the glidelock

[Watch Professor]

I very rarely use the Easy Link on my GMT IIC. I have the bracelet adjusted so that it fits very well in all types of weather.

[travisb]

I also live in the humid state of Florida and thought that I would put a lot of use to the updated clasp, but I can't recall the last time I actually used it.
The SubC fits just perfect on me.

[SaddleSC]

In the winter, I use it primarily to get the perfect fit and leave it alone. However, in the summer, I have found that I use it 4-5 times a week and it is great to have in those situations.

[jay_man2]

With my Sub c's I've used the glidelock to move it one notch back during the heat of the summer. I expect I'll be moving it back to the original position in the fall.

[masterserg]

For me it was a one time thing, to get it exactly right when sized. After that I didn't feel the need to change it ... Nice to know that I can though ...

[Mr. K]

never adjust mine but glad I have it just in case.

[HDHNTER]

I use it quite often.

[learpilot]

Originally Posted by xjeeunitx

I use the glidelock almost everyday as my wrist changes in size constantly. I make changes up to three micro adjustments depending on the situation so it's definitely a benefit for me. The regular flip-lock or DJ/GMT2C clasp are decent but the glidelock seals the deal for me in clasps for ALL watches. Notice I said all.

What he said !! Its VERY useful.

[Rig]

Is the glidelock enough reason alone to upgrade from a 16610 to a ceramic sub?

[Megalobyte]

Originally Posted by Rig

Is the glidelock enough reason alone to upgrade from a 16610 to a ceramic sub?

Ok, here's a can of worms.... :)

I personally think so. As others said, though I don't use it daily like I expected to, it did allow me a quick and easy perfect fit. Im also one who's weight fluctuates, has something to do with my proximity to Ring Dings, but anyway...the GL does come in handy for when I do Atkins for month or so and drop 25 lbs.

But, the upgrade to the bracelet and clasp is more than just the quick adjust feature. And, there are other worthy upgrades that I feel make the Sub C a finer watch, worth the premium. The relative merits are of course debatable, but, you have: a nicer clasp/bracelet, significantly better Lume/easier to read dial, super case which personally I prefer, I'm a big guy, even without excess ring ding consumption, 6'8", size 17 feet, so, the older Sub was just a little small on me. The C is the perfect size. Then there's the blue hairspring which purists will say is meaningless. Perhaps it's only as good functionally as the prior top grade nivarox, but it's one of the last parts that wasn't in house, so, by doing the spring in house, the movement becomes virtually 100% in house Rolex, which appeals to me.

Then you have the ceramic bezel. I know the pros and cons, theoretically more durable, but way more costly to replace. There's another feature of the bezel I like. The numbers cannot be scratched off, as they're deeply engraved into the ceramic. From what I gather, these bezels are pretty technologically sophisticated. Aside from the rare Internet story of a chipped bezel, they do seem to be extremely durable and virtually scratch proof. I also personally love the way the bezel reflects light, it gives the watch just a touch of a gem quality absent on aluminum insert watches, I realize that's subjective, and arguably at odds with the purpose of a true tool watch.

[Darlinboy]

I use it wuite often, especially on days of varied activity indoors and out.

[drdenn]

Originally Posted by Megalobyte

I love, love, did I mention love, my Sub C. I do feel it offers significant improvements over the 16610. One of the big ones I was really looking forward to was the Glidelock. I live in hot, humid FL, I frequently find my watches a little too loose, then when I'm hot and sweaty it's almost too snug. So, I thought the Glidelock was like a godsend, couldn't wait to use it.

Trouble is, I never do. I'm not sure why, other than I haven't felt the need. Though my wrist does swell at times, the bracelet still feels ok, when it gets loose, it's not really so loose I need to make it tighter.

I don't know, I truly expected to use it all the time, and I just don't.

Anybody else find this to be the case?

This is so funny, as I thought I would use it more often as well. I remember several times while wearing my 16610 thinking I wish I had a paper clip or watch tool right at this moment so I could loosen it up a bit. So, when the Glidelock came out w/ the other improvements I was thrilled.

That said, I find myself not using daily, but on average about once every 10 days. So, in the big picture it's super convenient when I do use it, and on those moments not so much a novelty at all! So, I am guessing that I would have a hard time going back to the previous clasp, as when I did want to adjust on the fly (like when at the gym) it would take more effort and planning rather than a 2 second fix.

[phampau]

I use it everday! I like the easy link also.