The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 22 August 2011, 02:15 AM   #1
7sins
"TRF" Member
 
7sins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,621
Panerai on a small wrist?

So, I have been debating on buying a panerai lately, I am deciding between a 312, 351, 359 and 111. The problem is I have the wrist size of a 12 year old girl (I am 23 FYI). Does anyone have any experience with how a 44mm Panerai will fit on a small wrist in terms of size and also long term comfortability? Below is a picture of a 42mm Navi 1461 jours on my wrist for comparison sake.

7sins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 02:29 AM   #2
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Those are large models your are contemplating. I would try them on, but should not be issue. You may want to try some of the base models (000, 111, 112) as they tend to wear a little smaller than 312 or 351. 351 is a very light watch, and I would highly recommend it for a smaller wrist over the heavier 312. Also look at 40mm 241. Just some thoughts.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 02:54 AM   #3
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
What Paul said I dumped my third 48 and stepped it back up to 44mm. I really wanted an in-house 1950 model. I wouldn't of bought one if it didn't come in Ti. The 312 is nice, but too to heavy in my opinion. I really love my 351. The brushed Ti case, gold hands and tabacco dial are very unique. I can pull it off with my relatively thin 6 3/4" wrists. My wrists are more rounded than flat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
Those are large models your are contemplating. I would try them on, but should not be issue. You may want to try some of the base models (000, 111, 112) as they tend to wear a little smaller than 312 or 351. 351 is a very light watch, and I would highly recommend it for a smaller wrist over the heavier 312. Also look at 40mm 241. Just some thoughts.
__________________
Adam
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 03:23 AM   #4
snog
"TRF" Member
 
snog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 908
111 as it's manual (and a great first Pam) tends to fit better and is smaller on the wrist then some auto models but will still be big on your wrist,it really comes down to if you want to wear a watch and forget it's there,for me walking through a doorway would be done sideways and I have 7.5'' wrists,I would go to your AD and try them on first.
snog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 04:43 AM   #5
KeWa
"TRF" Member
 
KeWa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
Watch: Panerai 305
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by walds11 View Post
The 312 is nice, but too to heavy in my opinion.
I am currently lookingnat a pam 312 and would like to know how much it weighs?
KeWa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 05:44 AM   #6
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
Not sure how much the 312 weighs. I meant it is too top heavy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeWa View Post
I am currently lookingnat a pam 312 and would like to know how much it weighs?
__________________
Adam
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 05:50 AM   #7
RJRJRJ
"TRF" Member
 
RJRJRJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,495
Ive got a 6.75" wrist and wear a 320. Its big, but in a good way.
RJRJRJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 03:27 AM   #8
Rolex Junky
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Lorenzo
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 116710LN & 116201
Posts: 849
THE PROBLEM WITH A LARGE CASE ON A SMALL WRIST IS THAT THE CASE WILL GET BANGED UP MORE EASILY! I think the diameter of the case should fall within the width of the wrist. Just my
Rolex Junky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2011, 08:48 AM   #9
pacifichrono
"TRF" Member
 
pacifichrono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Tom
Location: San Diego
Watch: 1968 GMT 1675
Posts: 1,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex Junky View Post
THE PROBLEM WITH A LARGE CASE ON A SMALL WRIST IS THAT THE CASE WILL GET BANGED UP MORE EASILY! I think the diameter of the case should fall within the width of the wrist. Just my
I agree. My wrist is only 6-7/8" and I find that I tend to bang big-case watches into things, plus they don't feel that comfortable with all that weight on one side.
pacifichrono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 03:50 AM   #10
john333
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
john333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gotham
Posts: 1,274
Best advice is to try them on yourself...so you can see how they fit on your wrist. IMO you would be better off with something like a 000, 005, 111, 112, 176, or 177 to start. While I love the look of the Luminors with the 1950 case, they are a little too thick for me.
john333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 04:13 AM   #11
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
It all depends on the size and shape of your wrists. I'm slightly lucky in that I have a pretty flat wrist given that I'm only 6.5" around.

Just try them on and only you can decide.

This is 42mm and wears big on me.


This is 45mm and wears perfect on me.


Here is a good 44mm for me.


Here is a BAD 45.5mm for me.


I wish I had a pic, but the 46mm IWC Mission Earth fits me like a glove.





















So, your wrist on a watch will fit........only one way to find out.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 04:24 AM   #12
MrTito
"TRF" Member
 
MrTito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Watch: BLNR, JLC Deep Sea
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
It all depends on the size and shape of your wrists. I'm slightly lucky in that I have a pretty flat wrist given that I'm only 6.5" around.

Just try them on and only you can decide.

This is 42mm and wears big on me.


This is 45mm and wears perfect on me.


Here is a good 44mm for me.


Here is a BAD 45.5mm for me.


I wish I had a pic, but the 46mm IWC Mission Earth fits me like a glove.





















So, your wrist on a watch will fit........only one way to find out.

Now you're just showing off!!!! Nice wardrobe
MrTito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 05:02 AM   #13
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTito View Post
Now you're just showing off!!!! Nice wardrobe
Not all are mine. I try on other people's watches and take a pic.

I have a 127 too (picture that is). Too big on me.



__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 04:29 AM   #14
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Just test them out and give it a shot as Mik said. They do come in different sizes by the way.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 05:07 AM   #15
skyedog
"TRF" Member
 
skyedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
I have a 6" wrist and I have a 050 40mmand a 336 42mm it looks fine...
but the other day when I am at the Ad I try on a 210 45mm and I really like it,
I guess the thickness make a big difference!

The only thing is I can never pull it off with a cal dial w/ 47mm it like I am wearing a clock on my wrist!
Attached Images
   
skyedog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 04:56 PM   #16
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7sins View Post
So, I have been debating on buying a panerai lately, I am deciding between a 312, 351, 359 and 111. The problem is I have the wrist size of a 12 year old girl (I am 23 FYI). Does anyone have any experience with how a 44mm Panerai will fit on a small wrist in terms of size and also long term comfortability? Below is a picture of a 42mm Navi 1461 jours on my wrist for comparison sake.

your 42 mm look ok on you so a 42 mm will look ok too. it will look bigger at first but i think you call pull it off.

the only problem is...that other people will notice it most of the time
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 05:09 PM   #17
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,521
I agree. The Navi looks ok.

Wear wharever makes YOU feel good.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 05:29 PM   #18
jay_kay
"TRF" Member
 
jay_kay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
My wife has tiny wrists but pulls the 44mm Luminors off with ease. Don't bother with the 40mm!!! You'll just end up flipping it for a 44!!
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
jay_kay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 12:57 AM   #19
mboverst
"TRF" Member
 
mboverst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay_kay View Post
My wife has tiny wrists but pulls the 44mm Luminors off with ease. Don't bother with the 40mm!!! You'll just end up flipping it for a 44!!
This, as some members here can attest to from the last GTG, my wife wear's 44mm PAM's almost daily!

Take the plunge and wear it a day, I promise it'll be weird at first and you'll be so used to it by day two that you won't want to go back to anything smaller.
mboverst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 01:07 AM   #20
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by mboverst View Post
Take the plunge and wear it a day, I promise it'll be weird at first and you'll be so used to it by day two that you won't want to go back to anything smaller.
x2
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 01:19 AM   #21
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
I think buying a panerai is not a small purchase.. So I highly recommend you to try it on before making any decisions.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 06:28 PM   #22
andrew79
"TRF" Member
 
andrew79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
I dont think you have problem with 44 mm pam... it will look just fine.... trust me, been there, done that.... work just fine for me in the end.
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera
Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570
Panerai 111 , 232
andrew79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2011, 06:34 PM   #23
MP5
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
40mm PAMS are a bad idea. They are hard to move. Always go with the 44
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 02:37 AM   #24
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
I'll chime in as a former 40mm wearer who traded up to the 44's and 45's. I've found that the observations of the different models feeling and wearing differently to be true, e.g., I'm not crazy about the 3 day autos in the 1950 case, but the winding models are all fine.
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 09:29 AM   #25
7sins
"TRF" Member
 
7sins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,621
Thank you everyone, this has been a huge help. I plan on going to the local AD here in Manhattan and trying on a few. My biggest issue is being young no one will give me the time of day, regardless if I am in an expensive suit or wearing my Navi. It looks like the radiomir wears a little smaller, I might just have to get one too.

Watches - an expensive hobby.
7sins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 10:40 AM   #26
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7sins View Post
Thank you everyone, this has been a huge help. I plan on going to the local AD here in Manhattan and trying on a few. My biggest issue is being young no one will give me the time of day, regardless if I am in an expensive suit or wearing my Navi. It looks like the radiomir wears a little smaller, I might just have to get one too.

Watches - an expensive hobby.
I find that it is best to just be open and honest with the AD. Tell them you love the look of Panerai and want to take some test drives so to speak but are worried about the size on your wrist. Need to decide if the watch is right for you. If they are any kind of salesmen/women, they'll treat you with respect and try to get you to come in again to buy a Panerai, JLC, etc.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 12:46 PM   #27
snog
"TRF" Member
 
snog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 908
you don't need them to give you the time of day, just pass you the watches to try on ,unless you walk in with notes falling out your pockets these guys can be $£%"$ to most people,if they are too up themselves, just start with the Pams, then move on to the Rolex, try the whole shop on,and if they really pee you off, ask them do they stock G shock!
snog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 02:42 PM   #28
watchyou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
PAM 24 on small 6.1 "wrist


PAM233
watchyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 10:04 PM   #29
jacksonian
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchyou View Post
PAM 24 on small 6.1 "wrist


PAM233
Looks awesome! Rock it, brother.
jacksonian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 09:04 PM   #30
rolexsweep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: RG DD40
Posts: 1,149
111 fits great on my wrist, I have small wrist trust me, looks big but I love it
__________________
"Did you get that at retail?"
rolexsweep is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.