ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Ugliest New Rolex | |||
Yachtmaster II two tone 44mm | 64 | 50.39% | |
GMT Master II 40mm yellow gold w/green dial | 12 | 9.45% | |
DeepSea Sea-Dweller 44mm | 12 | 9.45% | |
New Explorer II 42mm Orange Hand | 5 | 3.94% | |
Submariner Green Dial 40mm | 11 | 8.66% | |
Pointless Poll | 42 | 33.07% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
17 September 2011, 05:56 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
For Diehard Vintage Fans only!
We just had the prettiest DRSD contest so here's one in another direction.
Poll is not meant to offend. Just for fun to see if any of you find some of these models "esthetically challenged". |
17 September 2011, 06:03 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Dumb poll.
|
17 September 2011, 06:52 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
|
17 September 2011, 07:01 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 49
|
great time suck while at work. Ugliest vintage watch poll on the general forum to even things out?
|
17 September 2011, 07:02 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
|
17 September 2011, 07:12 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
|
Strange poll...
__________________
Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown... |
17 September 2011, 07:18 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,947
|
The new Datejust/DateDay is far uglier than the models listed above. IMHO.
|
17 September 2011, 08:25 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
|
18 September 2011, 11:49 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Shanghai
Watch: Too many to tell
Posts: 522
|
With the Brand taking a turn towards New Money / Power / Macho-styled Watches, I could not agree more with this poll. I could also agree that there are quite a few ugly vintages out there and would be equally happy to participate in such a poll. Let the games begin / Mesdames et Messieurs, Faites vos jeux!
|
18 September 2011, 12:16 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
It is a tough call, the Yachtmaster or Deep Sea - I see those two are leading the poll too.
I'd say the Deep Sea.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
18 September 2011, 07:58 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
|
|
18 September 2011, 08:27 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,689
|
I've also seen that the Milgauss, Explorer 1 and Airking are not too popular too on the attractiveness front though they do have some following.
__________________
Last thing I remember, I was Running outta sight I had to find the passage back,To the place I was before. ’Relax,’ said this Rolex place,We are programmed to receive. You can checkout any time you like, But you can never leave! |
18 September 2011, 08:56 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
I was guess the poll is not 100% exhaustive, LOL
Here is a parade of the candidates for the Miss Esthetically Challenged Rolex Pageant: Yacht Master 44mm Rose Gold and Steel: Gold GMT w/ Green dial and yellow insert: DeepSea 44mm: Sub Green dial green insert: Explorer II Orange hand 42mm: |
18 September 2011, 09:53 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
[QUOTE=roro;2746155]I was guess the poll is not 100% exhaustive, LOL
Did you really expect members to talk down on other members watches? |
18 September 2011, 10:22 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
Who added the last option to the poll?
__________________
..33 |
18 September 2011, 10:24 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
18 September 2011, 10:28 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
|
Guess what I voted for???
All these watches are beautiful watches. |
19 September 2011, 12:14 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: CT
Posts: 729
|
While I don't believe that any of these are necessarily "ugly", the YMII is just a little "too much" in my humble opinion.
It just looks like the most "un-Rolex" of the bunch... But again, just my humble opinion... |
19 September 2011, 04:41 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
That's a good way to put it. I guess most of these are not necessarily completely hideous but they're just not what constitutes Rolex pedigree and understated elegance IMHO. But then again, Rolex does sell every watch they make so there are fans of these watches out there...
|
19 September 2011, 05:04 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
x2 My thing is that people have different tastes and none of the watches, except the E2, is tasteful to me. However, my tastes, as well as the tastes of others, will most likely change in time and I suspect that my opinions will follow.
|
19 September 2011, 08:29 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Looks like the YM is the clear "winner" by a longshot. Pretty much what I was expecting as IMHO it has a busy dial, huge case, and major bling factor.
Pdoukas, you have a point. However, I think that this can swing one way and then the other. I actually had a DeepSea which was an impulse purchase when it first came out. I thought the watch was great initiallly (curved crystal, chromalight luminous, ceramic insert, glidelock). However as I kept wearing it, the initial appeal of these details wore off and I just noticed the huge 44mm diameter, 18mm thickness, and extra lines of superfluous literature on the dial and case. I actually used the watch for diving and was disappointed that Rolex didn't even address an obvious issue: too much reflection/glare off the bottom side of the crystal at too many angles ruins legibility while diving. The luminous intensity of the Chromalight is also too weak. Although I recognize the technical prowess of a watch that can withstand a depth of "3900m" its too clunky and "show-offy" for a Rolex. A side note on the "3900m", its a marketing figure for the Asian market since the number 4 is bad luck in Asia (the number 4 and the word "death" are written with the same character in certain Asian countries). Imagine a watch for diving that has "Death"on the dial... Anyway, I digress and this is not a review of the DeepSea. The point is, I unfortunately see the rest of the line of Rolex sports watches following the same trend: large cases, exaggerated dials, in your face details, etc. IMHO, Rolex is straying off the path of what made Rolex watches great for alot of people: Wearable elegant tool watches that are UNDERSTATED. Personally I think its a bit of a shame for such a great and established brand. Its a Rolex, it doesn't need to scream out loud that its a Rolex! |
19 December 2012, 04:56 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Air-King 5500
Posts: 2,620
|
I personally think that the dj 2 is pretty ugly.
|
19 December 2012, 03:10 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Linda
Location: New York State
Watch: Boys Tudor Sub
Posts: 1,131
|
|
19 December 2012, 09:27 PM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DB
Location: :noitacoL
Watch: :hctaW
Posts: 6,703
|
As they say... beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And the tastes of the beholder may change over time.
The 1655 or Milgauss might have won that "ugliest" poll a few decades ago.
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. |
19 December 2012, 10:19 PM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
|
Quote:
That's my opinion.
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member PClub # 10 74,592 The safest place for your watch is on your wrist. |
|
20 December 2012, 12:16 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Linda
Location: New York State
Watch: Boys Tudor Sub
Posts: 1,131
|
Can someone show me how to do a poll so I can take a poll and ask everyone if this is the dumbest poll ever?
|
20 December 2012, 01:11 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Heath
Location: Lawrenceburg KY
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 3,982
|
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Just because a watch may not be "MY" type, doesnt make it ugly. I would never look at a watch on someones wrist that they worked hard for and spent money on and tell them it was ugly which is what this poll is asking me to do.
I think everyone knows what my vote was and I am glad someone added the pointless poll option so I could vote as well. These watches are not cheap to the average meber here and I think it would be pretty low to say there watch is "ugly" JMHO
__________________
“You may delay, but time will not.” ― Benjamin Franklin |
20 December 2012, 02:56 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
|
i think the YM is one of the nastiest looking watches out there. yet i really like the new skydweller. it's a fine line between nasty and awesome, i guess...
__________________
2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.