ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 August 2007, 10:34 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Accuracy Update
|
10 August 2007, 10:43 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ..
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 1,820
|
Now that is one accurate watch! Also....GREAT image! Cheers, Bill P.
|
10 August 2007, 10:48 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
.
Not to worry Mike....as the battery runs down it will be spot on... |
10 August 2007, 10:57 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
That is spot on accurate!!
Doing the math on that, its basically gains 0.071 seconds a day!! Just gotta love that new caliber 3186 movement! Its quite a revolutionary movement. I hope they will introduce the blue hairspring to all the other models as well.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
10 August 2007, 11:01 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
Wow! That is amazing. Are you sure they didn't slip some quartz in that baby when you weren't looking.
|
10 August 2007, 11:03 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,571
|
That is wonderful! Wow. Glad this one is working out for you so well.
|
10 August 2007, 11:14 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Watch: GMT II TT 116713
Posts: 133
|
My 116713 is still settling down. I hope that I get mine running with near the accuracy of yours.
|
10 August 2007, 12:42 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
|
My 16610 still runs right at +1 sec/day after three weeks. It does not appear, yet, to be affected by positioning. We'll see... Congrats on the excelent accuracy! How DID we get to be such WISs, anyway? It is fun, though
__________________
SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464 |
10 August 2007, 06:34 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
|
10 August 2007, 06:38 PM | #10 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,593
|
That's great Mike, so I take it you haven't even laid it down at night to obtain any positional variation adjustment?
Great looking photo by the way. I haven't worn my Ceramic in over 2 weeks, because I paid $400 for the service of a TAG and it's already gone back twice after service and I'm just testing it out (10 seconds+) per day now before it goes back to TAG again. Some people are a little cutting about Rolex, but their servicing is like heaven compared to TAG (at least in my experience). My TAG is marked "chronometer"...yeah right Anyway, I'm looking to strap the GMT back on. |
10 August 2007, 06:42 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
That is extraordinary results, Mike!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
10 August 2007, 08:17 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
On the wrist It's been amazing. It'll be interesting to see in a few more weeks how it's doing as the movement settles in more. My experience has been a bit of speeding up after a while. I must say this is rapidly becomming my favorite modern piece!! |
|
10 August 2007, 08:29 PM | #13 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Mike i am amazed i never heard of a thing like that. Do you guys think that this is happening because of the upgrades that the movement had?
|
10 August 2007, 08:50 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
Other owners of the new GMT II have reported "bad" timing, in fact down to minus 4 seconds (which IS within the COSC standards, but nevertheless still pretty "bad" timing). But if you are really lucky, the way the specific watch you buy was actually adjusted - PLUS ÝOUR wearing manners - combine into an incredibly precise running timepiece, as with Mike's GMT II. BTW: I asked my AD (after I had some correspondance with Mike about this extraordinary precision), and my AD said that the "rules" about being able to regulate the timekeeping of your Rolex by simply putting the watch in various ways on the bedside table ("positional correction") in fact does not really apply to the MODERN movements as they are not easily influenced by positional correction (that is probably also the reason as to why the leaflet with the rules of "positional correction" is also no longer supplied with the "modern" movements of Rolex). Again a BTW: For those who may not know: The "positional correction rules" are: Watch laying FLAT on the table, crystal upwards: Watch will GAIN some secs. Watch laying HORIZONTALLY with the winding crown DOWNwards: the watch will lose a couple of secs. Watch laying HORIZONTALLY with the winding crown UPwards: the watch will lose some MORE secs. But as stated, these "positional rules" would tend NOT to work with modern Rolex movements. BUT: Once your Rolex has "settled in" (say about a months time of wearing it), you can simply go to your AD and let him know what YOUR specific "wearing manners" are (i.e. "office work"? "Active life style" etc., etc.). That way you can actually have the Rolex adjusted to go pretty "spot on"
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... Last edited by SPACE-DWELLER; 10 August 2007 at 10:04 PM.. |
|
10 August 2007, 08:59 PM | #15 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
|
Quote:
Which Tag do you have Steve?
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN |
|
10 August 2007, 09:00 PM | #16 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Nice info spacedweller i didn't knew that the positional rules do not apply on new movements
|
10 August 2007, 09:05 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
Please call me Bo
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
10 August 2007, 10:13 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,950
|
Quote:
Man, what a piece of junk. One second in almost 2 weeks, I'd return it for a FULL refund. On second thoughts, I'll give you $500, and I'll throw in shipping too. Seriously though, that is damn good accuracy. I really, really like the new GMT too. Pity it didn't come out before I bought my blue TT Sub. Wear it in good health, my friend John. |
|
10 August 2007, 11:07 PM | #19 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,593
|
My TAG HEUER is the Tag 6000 Chronometer ETA movement. It was working fine until I took it into TAG.
I really wanted this watch for a long time. Maybe I just need to give it a little time to settle down. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.