The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 April 2012, 08:24 PM   #1
ggelvis
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
14060M or the new 114060

Guys, I am going to buy my first Rolex this year. I am interested in the ND sub. Two options are now available: a G serial 14060M from AD or wait for the new released 114060. 14060m is definitley a classic model, however, I prefer a "strong" brecelet; also I am concerned about the bule hairspring, does it matter that much? The 114060 has a Non SEL and soild bracelet, but is it more brittle?
So what is your option?
Thanks
ggelvis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2012, 08:33 PM   #2
Kingair
"TRF" Member
 
Kingair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
Good question
How are we going to take your decision . . .
Go and try each at a Rolex store and compare.
In real life on your wrist and take your time
Make sure you buy the one that suites you 100 %

Good luck
Kingair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2012, 08:37 PM   #3
wokafu
"TRF" Member
 
wokafu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
I'm leaning towards the SUB C ND..but thats cause i already have a 14060M... I say get the classic as a 1st...and im sure the SUB C ND gon follow soon
wokafu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2012, 08:57 PM   #4
ggelvis
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Thanks, I just tried the old one, looks great but feels very light. Hope the new one will be available in a couple of mons.
ggelvis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2012, 08:58 PM   #5
ggelvis
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by wokafu View Post
I'm leaning towards the SUB C ND..but thats cause i already have a 14060M... I say get the classic as a 1st...and im sure the SUB C ND gon follow soon
how do feel about your 14060M?
ggelvis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2012, 11:12 PM   #6
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
This topic has been discussed a lot lately. If you do a quick search for 14060 you will get lots of threads on the subject. Here is the latest.

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...ghlight=14060m


IMHO, the ceramic has to much gloss on the new Rolex sport watches. If Rolex gave the dial and ceramic insert a matt finish like the new Omega PO's, it would have been a huge hit. Now it has sadly fallen into the world of jewelery, get a 14060 now.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2012, 11:21 PM   #7
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Bah Humbug
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2012, 11:59 PM   #8
brettpaul
"TRF" Member
 
brettpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
I would get the 14060 - if you get the G-serial I believe it should have the blue parachrom hairspring (not that it matters). I've got one myself and will also get the 114060 when it's released...honestly, the bracelet on the 14060 is just fine...it's worked better than most other brands for the past 50 years!
brettpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 12:08 AM   #9
bigwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
bigwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,307
Easy. 14060M. Not a fan of the fat lugs.
bigwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 12:11 AM   #10
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggelvis View Post
Thanks, I just tried the old one, looks great but feels very light. Hope the new one will be available in a couple of mons.
And that is a bad thing? I don't care for the ceramic bezel or the maxi lugs. Old school all the way
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 12:14 AM   #11
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggelvis View Post
Thanks, I just tried the old one, looks great but feels very light. Hope the new one will be available in a couple of mons.
Lightness is the beauty of the watch, you forget it's there until you need it
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 12:18 AM   #12
errol0_7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: them come and go
Posts: 689
ceramic for me, looks awesome, I like the newer clasps and fat lugs and also a big fan or the ceramic bezels that Rolex make
__________________
John
Sub 126610LV incoming
GMT 126710 BLRO
YM 40 126622 Rhodium
IWC Portugieser Automatic 40.4mm - Pink dial
errol0_7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 12:44 AM   #13
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Hairspring is a dont care IMO.

I think the old bracelets are plenty strong. What are you worried about?

It's fine to wait for the new one of you prefer the new mods. Do you?
You will likely be waiting for a while...
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 02:29 AM   #14
Roxas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 516
Parachrom hairspring doesn't matter much. And the bracelet of 14060M is pretty strong. The new model has a better clasp.
Roxas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 02:38 AM   #15
FX44
"TRF" Member
 
FX44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingair View Post
Good question
How are we going to take your decision . . .
Go and try each at a Rolex store and compare.
In real life on your wrist and take your time
Make sure you buy the one that suites you 100 %

Good luck
+1 Try each one on, buy the one that looks and feels the best to you
__________________
Submariner 114060
FX44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 03:21 AM   #16
springbar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggelvis View Post
Guys, I am going to buy my first Rolex this year. I am interested in the ND sub. Two options are now available: a G serial 14060M from AD or wait for the new released 114060. 14060m is definitley a classic model, however, I prefer a "strong" brecelet; also I am concerned about the bule hairspring, does it matter that much? The 114060 has a Non SEL and soild bracelet, but is it more brittle?
So what is your option?
Thanks
Don't be misled by macho-looking lugs or end-links: neither ever fail. Bracelets are only as strong as their weakest links, which are the spring bars.

The 14060 bracelet is very strong and functional, and appeals on a nostalgic level, but does seem out-of-place on an expensive watch in 2012. Those of us who prefer it know who we are. If you're undecided, you'd probably prefer the new one.
springbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 05:14 AM   #17
stockae92
2024 Pledge Member
 
stockae92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,964
you won't break the 14060M bracelet if you are wearing it on your wrist

don't worry :)

i would go for 14060M because its already discontined and soon they won't be available as new watch at the AD

if you like the 114060 down the road, you can still get them new cause Rolex will be making them years to come
__________________
135
├┼┼╕
246 R
stockae92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 05:16 AM   #18
Bobble
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Paul
Location: Midlands UK
Watch: GMT IIc, Daytona
Posts: 423
I would go old school, if you think how many older Rolex's are still running without the 'Blue hairspring", including my two old Omega's, one being 47years and the other one is 78 years old and both have such a lovely 'tick' the latter one especially
Bobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 05:18 AM   #19
boogiebot
"TRF" Member
 
boogiebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
personally i like the updates to the case as well as the ceramic bezel and glide lock clasp of the new subs. my vote goes for the new sub nd. im sure whatever you end up with you will love and you really cant go wrong with either.
boogiebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 05:38 AM   #20
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
I don't get why people wouldn't go with the new one. How many of you go to a car lot and buy the old discontinued model??? If you want a ND Sub buy one that's a few years old and save 50%. The ND Sub C isn't worth the asking price either IMO but I'd rather have it than the older one.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 05:48 AM   #21
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
If you go pre-owned, you'll be able to find nice examples for 50-60% of the new NDc. Only you can decide if the ceramic bezel, fat lugs and new bracelet is worth it.

Either watch is a fine choice.

Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 06:27 AM   #22
CDNWatchNut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
If a significant concern of yours is the strength of the bracelet, then I would add to what springbar said above. The springbars are indeed the weakest link. And to add to that, I would suggest that the old school 14060 with lug holes and thicker springbars all the way through is superior In this aspect to the new sub ND-c with it's standard spring bars and no lug holes. Just another thought to consider if robustness is important to you.
CDNWatchNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 06:15 PM   #23
Roxas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwalker View Post
I don't get why people wouldn't go with the new one. How many of you go to a car lot and buy the old discontinued model??? If you want a ND Sub buy one that's a few years old and save 50%. The ND Sub C isn't worth the asking price either IMO but I'd rather have it than the older one.
I don't like the case of the new one. Also the old one is cheaper.
Roxas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 06:21 PM   #24
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Classic 14060 for me!
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 06:38 PM   #25
wokafu
"TRF" Member
 
wokafu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggelvis View Post
how do feel about your 14060M?
a week after i got my 14060M i tried the 116610 ..i was eager to trade it for the SUB C..before i did anything 'stupid' i seek some advice from the experts here on TRF...most of the experts here ask me to keep it coz its a true classic ...so i did..and sure enough the 14060M grew on me...the classic look..its comfortable and its cool as it is....to me the upgrade version got everything i love ...the glide lock/ceremic bezel/ a larger case...but i think its a lil 'unfair' to compare both side by side because 14060 kept its 'heritage' wherby the upgrade version got what i like to call 'better quality' ....if you ask me to choose again as my 1st...i will still pick the classic especially now since its been discontinued...hope this will help you instead of confusing you...but like all em TRFers said...you win either way because its a ROLEX...

p/s-did i mentioned about the lug holes where the new version's lack of..?
wokafu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 06:57 PM   #26
ggelvis
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by wokafu View Post
a week after i got my 14060M i tried the 116610 ..i was eager to trade it for the SUB C..before i did anything 'stupid' i seek some advice from the experts here on TRF...most of the experts here ask me to keep it coz its a true classic ...so i did..and sure enough the 14060M grew on me...the classic look..its comfortable and its cool as it is....to me the upgrade version got everything i love ...the glide lock/ceremic bezel/ a larger case...but i think its a lil 'unfair' to compare both side by side because 14060 kept its 'heritage' wherby the upgrade version got what i like to call 'better quality' ....if you ask me to choose again as my 1st...i will still pick the classic especially now since its been discontinued...hope this will help you instead of confusing you...but like all em TRFers said...you win either way because its a ROLEX...

p/s-did i mentioned about the lug holes where the new version's lack of..?
nice review, the 14060M does feel great. I need to wear both of them to make a final decision, but the problem is that the new one may be avaiable way late this year...
ggelvis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 06:59 PM   #27
ggelvis
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
theprice of the new one seems to be added 10% .
ggelvis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 06:59 PM   #28
Wristmaster
"TRF" Member
 
Wristmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: A.K.W
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Me Watching U
Posts: 587
Get classic. And ceramic date later.
Wristmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 07:04 PM   #29
wokafu
"TRF" Member
 
wokafu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
no prob my man....there's plenty of great 1st class seller here on TRF if you dont like the new one...cheers..
wokafu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 10:12 PM   #30
mopsey
"TRF" Member
 
mopsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
Without starting yet another thread about the 14060m, I feel obliged to announce that i had a call from AD yesterday to say that a brand spanking new Sub is on it's way with my name on it. Hopefully it'll be with me on Thursday evening.
Oh the joys. I feel it's going to compliment my 16570 perfectly.
__________________
Lest we forget.
mopsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.