ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 July 2012, 12:17 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
Love/Hate relationships. What do you like and dislike about your Rolex?
I love my DSSD dearly, to say the least. There are a squillion things I love about it. BUT, inevitably there are pros and cons to everything in life....
I love the ring lock ring around the dial of my DSSD. It's an engineering marvel that is an important structural part of of its waterproof system. It serves a very important purpose and I love it how Rolex has shown it off by exposing it around the dial. But to a degree I also dislike the ring, as I also prefer a bigger dial that stretches out to the bezel instead of having a ring. I love its maxi dial. But I dislike its matte finish, as I prefer a glossy dial (like on my SubC) instead. What are some of the things you like and dislike about your Rolex? |
6 July 2012, 12:20 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Watch: Sea Dweller 116600
Posts: 252
|
I'm not too fond of the hollow centre links on my GMT II. They sometime rattle when I'm driving.
What I love about the GMT is the interchangeable bezels. You can't beat 3 watches in one. I'm sporting an all black insert on my GMT at the moment.
__________________
Ex. 2014 GMT II BLNR 116710 Ex. 2014 Daytona 116520 Black Ex. 2004 GMT II "Coke", "Pepsi", "Black" 16710 Ex. 2006 Platinum Yacht-Master 16622 Ex. Breitling Emergency Coral E76321 |
6 July 2012, 12:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
I have had love/hate relationships with all my watches until last week. I bought a DSSD and it is the culmination of all the things I have ever wanted in a watch. There is not one thing that I dislike about it. It took me alot of watches to finally find what I was looking for long term.
|
6 July 2012, 12:25 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
Quote:
NICE!!!!! |
|
6 July 2012, 12:26 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Quote:
|
|
6 July 2012, 12:31 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
My TT Blue SubC is everthing i want,there is nothing i dislike about it. The only watch i might,and thats a big might,change it for would be a GMTc Pepsi,if they ever made one.
|
6 July 2012, 02:26 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
There are no cons to any of my watches from my perspective.
I bought them after considerable thought with a bit of love at first sight. I think that my Sub is more versatile for everyday wear, but the Explorer and the DJ are also great for daily wear and especially those times when I don't want to wear a large watch. I'm pleased was punch with mine.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
6 July 2012, 02:27 AM | #8 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Quote:
|
|
6 July 2012, 02:30 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
|
The only complaint I have about my Yacht-Master is how high maintenance the bezel is. It is a little vulnerable to scratches and dings (compared to the other sports models), and VERY expensive to replace or service.
With that being said, IMO the bezel is a large part of what sets the YM apart from all the other sports models, and there is not another SS Rolex model I'd rather wear |
6 July 2012, 02:36 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Love everything about both my Daytona and DJ! Wouldn't change a thing.
|
6 July 2012, 02:41 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
|
The 216570 is everything I ever wanted in a modern Rolex and I sure flipped a lot to get to this point. I don't hate much about the older stuff either. My hate relationship with Rolex isn't about the watch but the fact my watch isn't so rare and that RSCs can get away with trying to pull the wool over our eyes.
|
6 July 2012, 02:47 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: On Earth
Watch: A Few
Posts: 1,510
|
i hate it says "rolex" on the dial. can't really share my passion of horology with strangers, they'd just look at me and be like "why are you showing off your rolex?"
|
6 July 2012, 03:05 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
I'd say the cost, otherwise they are simply joy to own
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
6 July 2012, 03:11 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
|
6 July 2012, 03:16 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Watch: Rolex - a few!
Posts: 1,472
|
|
6 July 2012, 03:54 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
|
The TT DJ in my avatar is my grail.
If I didn't love it I'd get something else!
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here... Lug Hole Lover® |
6 July 2012, 03:54 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
|
6 July 2012, 04:03 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Rochester
Watch: 116610LV, 116613LB
Posts: 157
|
|
6 July 2012, 04:13 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Madrid
Posts: 55
|
I hate I can't have all the Rolex that I want
|
6 July 2012, 04:29 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
I'm very happy with my 16570. I don't know what I would change.
|
6 July 2012, 04:44 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Oh, I have lots of input. I have yet to find my ideal watch but I can easily describe it to you: SubC with a matter style of ceramic bezel (or even old style metal bezel insert), a domed crystal without cyclops and matte dial, perhaps slightly thinner lugs. There you have it. Perfection.
There is lots to love about the DSSD, the matte dial being one of my favorite things but it has way too much text and they could have certainly made it less chunky design-wise. A SD 16600 with a maxi dial/hands and a new style bracelet would certainly be a very nice watch. |
6 July 2012, 04:53 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
I wish my DJII had a bracelet adjustment similar to the glidelock.
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
6 July 2012, 04:54 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
Minor stuff. Love my DSSD except that it does have too many writings on the dial. Rolex did not need to include "Sea Dweller". The ring didn't have to have the GEV or RLS info; in fact that ring was not a 100% necessity so that the dial could've been bigger and different than the maxi dial used in the SubLV, SubC, etc. My opinion only.
|
6 July 2012, 05:16 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollywood
Watch: SMP007/GMTIIC/DSSD
Posts: 204
|
I love them all and took a lot of thinking before buying. If there is something I don't love about the watch then I don't buy it because I don't really plan to sell it in the future. I would have to live with it forever. For example the old yacht mater, I like the way it looks but didn't like the clasp. But with the new yacht master with improved clasp it's back on the top of the list.
|
6 July 2012, 05:17 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
It could be a little bigger.
|
6 July 2012, 05:18 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Australia
Posts: 321
|
love my 16600, but wish it would have the new bracelt as found on the Sub-c
|
6 July 2012, 05:19 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
There's actually a famous post about this on TZ. The gist of it is, "I want a Rolex, but I don't want it to be a Rolex".
|
6 July 2012, 06:41 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 479
|
I love almost everything about my 16610 and 16600, except for:
... the cyclops on the 16610. I'm near-sighted so I don't need the magnification and the cyclops distorts and clutters the dial to my old eyes. ... the dial size to thickness ratio of the 16600. Great watch but it's a little chunky for the smallish dial. John |
6 July 2012, 06:45 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
I hate that I dont own more of them.
__________________
|
6 July 2012, 06:45 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
My only gripe about my 14060M is the the clasp...other then that...I am absolutely in love with it...thats right, im in love with my watch.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.