The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 17 August 2012, 09:46 AM   #1
baldyspoon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: uk
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 725
114060 Disappointment

Tried on the new sub after help from trf members and must say I was disappointed, I could not beilive how light this watch is. Maybe because I am used to my Omega Seamaster and Planet Ocean and Breitling Chronospace that it felt so light on my wrist. I thought one knock of this watch and it would snap not a thought I've had with my other watches, it is a lovely watch but I would be frightend to wear it in fear of breaking it. I know lots of members on here have this watch so please don't have a go at me as I love the watch just not how light it felt on my wrist.
baldyspoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 09:49 AM   #2
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
I'll speak for Padi.....why is it people think bigger, heavier etc. is better?????

P.S. I thought the OP was disappointed in the new ND sub as it was the last tool watch w/ lug holes in the line-up & now they're gone.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 09:50 AM   #3
TonyD
2024 Pledge Member
 
TonyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Boston North
Watch: Meteorite Daytona
Posts: 1,471
Hey it is what it is. I agree lots of Rolex do feel somewhat light compared to other watches. Try a vintage GMT on for size some day! It feels like a toy because the links are all hollow.

Wear what you like. My one suggestion would be to try it again some other day. My DSSD is about as heavy a Rolex as you will see and it is still dwarfed by a lot of the watches you mention.

The good news is that 99.9% of the guys here on TRF will not judge or tease you, but truly wish that you find a watch that makes you happy. (Like me!)
__________________
Pepsi GMT/SD43/DSSD Blue/ DJ41 TT Rose Diamond Dial/ Daytona Meteorite/ SS Sky Dweller White Dial/ IWC Bronze Big Pilot/ Aquanautic Super King / Omega Ploprof 1200 / Graham Scarab Diver
TonyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 09:55 AM   #4
joffrey888
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: philippines
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyD View Post
Hey it is what it is. I agree lots of Rolex do feel somewhat light compared to other watches. Try a vintage GMT on for size some day! It feels like a toy because the links are all hollow.

Wear what you like. My one suggestion would be to try it again some other day. My DSSD is about as heavy a Rolex as you will see and it is still dwarfed by a lot of the watches you mention.

The good news is that 99.9% of the guys here on TRF will not judge or tease you, but truly wish that you find a watch that makes you happy. (Like me!)
buy with your heart...me 2 hope you will find a watch that will make you happy.....
joffrey888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 09:56 AM   #5
Al1988
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New York City
Watch: Watch
Posts: 1,000
Makes me wonder, if you thought the 114060 with the updated bracelet and clasp felt weak and breakable, then I shudder to think what you thought of the 14060M with the older style bracelet and clasp, or rather any Rolex that does not have a glidelock or easy-link bracelet
Al1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 10:03 AM   #6
caryyee
"TRF" Member
 
caryyee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
It may be 'light' compared to a PO but the case and bracelet is built to the same bulletproof standards as any other Rolex sports watch. If you encountered a force strong enough to break the watch while wearing it, then I pity what that force would do to your arm! :-)
caryyee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 10:23 AM   #7
Feras
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Feras
Location: Bahrain
Watch: Rolex,Tag
Posts: 1,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Robert View Post
I'll speak for Padi.....why is it people think bigger, heavier etc. is better?????

P.S. I thought the OP was disappointed in the new ND sub as it was the last tool watch w/ lug holes in the line-up & now they're gone.
X2
Feras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 10:36 AM   #8
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
Everything is relative and what you're accustomed to.

I promise you the Sub can take every bit as much punishment as those other watches, maybe more.

It's not really that the Sub is light, it's more that the PO and Breitling are a bit overweight and could benefit from a little dieting. :) Wear a Patek Aquanaut on rubber for a few days, then try on the Sub, it'll feel like an anvil. ( Dont own a Patek, but was amazed at how light and thin it seemed when I tried one on. I'll admit, my first gut feeling was it was flimsy and toy-like, but of course it's really not.)
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 10:37 AM   #9
ROGERWILCO357
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Watch: Submariner LV
Posts: 580
and that is why I love the Rolex Sub feels nice not too light but not a brick on my wrist either , built to last and outlast ..Just the opposite reaction I tried on the Breitling and that felt way to heavy and bulky for my taste but to each his own , always buy what feels right for you.
ROGERWILCO357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 10:39 AM   #10
The Godzilla
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 200
Rolex = light but strong

maybe the 904L is lighter than 316L but stronger, something like Ti
The Godzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 10:55 AM   #11
Dan2010
"TRF" Member
 
Dan2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
You REALLY think it will break in half so easily because it is light? Rolex watches are legendary for being sport watches and taking punishment.

I am with Padi on this.

I just don't understand peoples thinking anymore.
Dan2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 11:13 AM   #12
gwozhog
"TRF" Member
 
gwozhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Point Blank, TX
Posts: 2,894
That's to bad because the watch is a legend and a work horse. To me it represents the ultimate tool watch.
__________________
I once dated a girl in high school and her dad told me I would never amount to anything. He was right
gwozhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 11:38 AM   #13
sleddog
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
sleddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
You can't please everyone, and that's why there are other models out there to select....we are after all, individuals!
Always good to hear another's point of view though!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!!

TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..
sleddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 11:42 AM   #14
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Godzilla View Post
Rolex = light but strong

maybe the 904L is lighter than 316L but stronger, something like Ti

Not true - they are both stainless steels, with a slightly different composition

If the 114060 was made of Ti then it really would be light!
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 11:42 AM   #15
Bangel
"TRF" Member
 
Bangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
I think the sub is as sturdy as they come, but if it's not to your liking then more power to you for being a step closer in your decision making about choosing a new watch.

After all, everyone has their own tastes and we all like different watches for different reasons.
Bangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 11:53 AM   #16
wineguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mark
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 36
Compare a Sub to most quartz watches. It'll feel like a tank. It's all relative.
wineguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 12:07 PM   #17
Ebruner
"TRF" Member
 
Ebruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
Good thing you didn't buy it sight unseen then.

Different strokes for different folks.

I think most all SS Rolex watches will disappoint you with that being your criteria.

-Eddie
__________________
Ebruner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 12:09 PM   #18
floater156
"TRF" Member
 
floater156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
Isn't a light watch more comfortable for you?
__________________
Lead by example through production.
floater156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 12:13 PM   #19
Ebruner
"TRF" Member
 
Ebruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldyspoon View Post
Tried on the new sub after help from trf members and must say I was disappointed, I could not beilive how light this watch is. Maybe because I am used to my Omega Seamaster and Planet Ocean and Breitling Chronospace that it felt so light on my wrist. I thought one knock of this watch and it would snap not a thought I've had with my other watches, it is a lovely watch but I would be frightend to wear it in fear of breaking it. I know lots of members on here have this watch so please don't have a go at me as I love the watch just not how light it felt on my wrist.
I have a question, you have been a TRF member a long time, is the your first Rolex experience? I ask because other than the DSSD and Gold models, the 114060 is heavier than most SS Rolex.

-Eddie
__________________
Ebruner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 12:13 PM   #20
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Ask the watchmaker if he'll solder some lead to the case back.

Hey! There could be a new market out there for chrome-plated lead case backs.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 12:46 PM   #21
DJJon
"TRF" Member
 
DJJon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
Buy the WG Sub if it is weight that you want.

The original Sub/bracelet combo has legions of diehard fans quite because it isn't an anvil on the wrist but a tough competitor that has iconic classic lines. The 114060 is heftier as it is a modern extension of that design, but it is not a boat.

Gotta love it no matter what it doesn't have for all that it does have.
DJJon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 01:16 PM   #22
The Godzilla
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 200
I would said that the older Rolex model was indeed very light

However the new model with new maxi case, bracelets and clasp, the weight improved a lot and feels much solid
The Godzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 01:27 PM   #23
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
I remember in another thread the 114060 is only 2.5 grams lighter than the 116610... not nearly the difference between the 14060 and 16610.

I own both the 116610 and 114060 and they both feel substantial enough IMO, love them both
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 01:45 PM   #24
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebruner View Post
I have a question, you have been a TRF member a long time, is the your first Rolex experience? I ask because other than the DSSD and Gold models, the 114060 is heavier than most SS Rolex.

-Eddie
a solid question....
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 01:55 PM   #25
wokafu
"TRF" Member
 
wokafu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
go for the beast aka DSSD...i'm sure it wont make you feel the same as the 114060..i tried the 116610 felt like its going to break my wrist...
wokafu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 02:04 PM   #26
wuyeah
"TRF" Member
 
wuyeah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 952
Don't worry, most of Rolex will feel shocking light if you own Breitling or Omega. Soon you will get use to it and later will start pick on why other watches are built so heavy on wrist and made you feel uncomfortable.
wuyeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 02:13 PM   #27
gregvisser
2024 Pledge Member
 
gregvisser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Greg Visser
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 587
Its all in the date wheel. Leaving that out drops a lot of weight out of the watch.

It's plenty strong and plenty beefy. Bigger is not neccessarily better.

Greg
gregvisser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 03:10 PM   #28
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregvisser View Post
Its all in the date wheel. Leaving that out drops a lot of weight out of the watch.

It's plenty strong and plenty beefy. Bigger is not neccessarily better.

Greg
What do you know, you're a Pam head now anyway. :)

Besides, in my case, big is good. :)
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 03:17 PM   #29
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
Interesting thread. Great read guys and it's nice to have a civilized discussion and not have someone getting angry.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2012, 03:27 PM   #30
Marrk
"TRF" Member
 
Marrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
Just this week, I tried on the 114060 for the first time. I thought it was thick and heavy and big, not light and fragile. So, I was disappointed for the opposite reason.
Marrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.