ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JRRolex · 30 October 2007, 09:34 AM

I was wondering if anyone could describe, or post side by side pics of these two jewels, I own a 14060m, and have always loved the vintage 5513, although I have never held one. What is are the differences physically? I know the crystal/dial is, but what about the case, bezel, and bracelet? they seem so alike, yet there is something I cannot put my finger on that sets them apart. -J

mike · 30 October 2007, 10:30 AM

Can't do a comparison, don't have a 14060.

The two use a different movement. 15xx slow beat for the 5513 and 3xxx fast beat for the 14060. Different steel and of course dial. I've found the 5513 feels lighter than the newer version (one's I tried on). And yeah, there is a different look.

5513,

Tools · 30 October 2007, 10:38 AM

14060M:

Cut them out and lay them side by side..

mcubed · 30 October 2007, 11:20 AM

Check this out

http://www.oysterworld.de/5513vs14060.htm

SPACE-DWELLER · 30 October 2007, 11:24 AM

You get a flatter look with the 14060M due to the sapphire crystal, and also the WG dial figures are not applied to the 5513, making for a totally different look.

mike · 30 October 2007, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcubed

Check this out

http://www.oysterworld.de/5513vs14060.htm

Yep! Forgot about that link. Great comparison!

daunwaun · 30 October 2007, 01:45 PM

cant add anymore then what the members above have already added!!

JRRolex · 31 October 2007, 11:36 AM

You guys (and ladies) ROCK! The link was great and exactly what I was looking for :)

30 October 2007, 09:34 AM	#1
JRRolex Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: John Location: usa Watch: Sub 14060m Posts: 61	14060 vs. 5513 physical comparison I was wondering if anyone could describe, or post side by side pics of these two jewels, I own a 14060m, and have always loved the vintage 5513, although I have never held one. What is are the differences physically? I know the crystal/dial is, but what about the case, bezel, and bracelet? they seem so alike, yet there is something I cannot put my finger on that sets them apart. -J

30 October 2007, 11:24 AM	#5
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	You get a flatter look with the 14060M due to the sapphire crystal, and also the WG dial figures are not applied to the 5513, making for a totally different look. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

30 October 2007, 01:45 PM	#7
daunwaun "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: toronto Watch: 18K YG Day Date Posts: 2,985	cant add anymore then what the members above have already added!! __________________ DAUNWAUN

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

30 October 2007, 10:30 AM	#2
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Can't do a comparison, don't have a 14060. The two use a different movement. 15xx slow beat for the 5513 and 3xxx fast beat for the 14060. Different steel and of course dial. I've found the 5513 feels lighter than the newer version (one's I tried on). And yeah, there is a different look. 5513,

30 October 2007, 10:38 AM	#3
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,514	14060M: Cut them out and lay them side by side..

30 October 2007, 11:20 AM	#4
mcubed "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: US Posts: 468	Check this out http://www.oysterworld.de/5513vs14060.htm

31 October 2007, 11:36 AM	#8
JRRolex Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: John Location: usa Watch: Sub 14060m Posts: 61	You guys (and ladies) ROCK! The link was great and exactly what I was looking for :)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)