ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 October 2012, 02:52 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Arsen
Location: So Cal
Watch: 16600 SD
Posts: 186
|
1675 Transformation-What would you have done?
In the beginning 2004:
After Rolex Service 2006: In 2012: Please feel free to comment. Thank you for looking |
10 October 2012, 03:40 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Watch: Rolex.Tudor.PAM
Posts: 1,554
|
1st your 2006 (Swiss) dial is different to your 2012 (<25) dail. So you or someone has changed it out since the service in 2006.
If you have changed it back since the 2006 service then I like what you have done in 2012 . The way I initially read this was the watch had aged since the 2006 service. Disregard my opening sentance. Cheers |
10 October 2012, 03:41 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Arsen
Location: So Cal
Watch: 16600 SD
Posts: 186
|
|
10 October 2012, 03:46 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: johannesburg
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 4,407
|
Did you buy a second watch?
|
10 October 2012, 03:54 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Arsen
Location: So Cal
Watch: 16600 SD
Posts: 186
|
|
10 October 2012, 03:59 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: johannesburg
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 4,407
|
|
10 October 2012, 06:54 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Was the dial shown in 2004 the original? Shouldn't a PCG have a gilt dial? I'd have kept the original dial, I think. Maybe get a new/other minute hand, and a new plexi and service the movement. Looks good now though!
|
10 October 2012, 07:09 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Willem
Location: Pretoria RSA
Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX
Posts: 1,072
|
Very nice.
__________________
Rolex Datejust II WG/SS Blue 116334 "8368xxxx" Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43 126600 "94A6xxxx" Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller 116660 "V84xxxx" Rolex Deepsea D-Blue Horizon 116660 "3170xxxx" Rolex Explorer II Polar 16570 "T20xxxx" Rolex Explorer II Black 216570 "G53xxxx" Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "P32xxxx" Rolex GMT-Master II Ceramic 116710LN "V97xxxx" Rolex Submariner 16610 "Z61xxxx" Rolex Submariner Ceramic 116610LN "G79xxxx" |
10 October 2012, 07:15 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
It looks very nice but it does not appear to be period correct.
|
10 October 2012, 08:22 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
My guess was also that there where other parts involved . . .
The patina between '06 & '12 . . . was to obvious A really different watch you got now . . . I like it . . . parts may not be time/year correct but you can always swap HAGOne |
10 October 2012, 11:47 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
I love the patina, would have preferred guilt dial to be more period correct. Looks great
|
11 October 2012, 12:00 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
I have no idea if it is period correct or not, but I like the 2012 version. Then again, I like the 2006 version as well :)
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
11 October 2012, 12:13 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston
Watch: 116509 BlackArabic
Posts: 1,176
|
why not just keep the patina parts in the other watch?
i prefer the 2006 clean version
__________________
Life is an adventure or nothing at all. |
11 October 2012, 01:21 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
X2. The original dial probably was gilt.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
11 October 2012, 01:46 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PA
Watch: SubLV, 1665 Rail
Posts: 1,054
|
I like the look but from a collector's point of view it decreases value. Great look though
__________________
|
11 October 2012, 04:23 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tampa
Posts: 19
|
I like the 2012 faded look it gives it such a vintage feel.
|
11 October 2012, 04:38 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
|
11 October 2012, 05:04 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
|
12 October 2012, 12:17 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Arsen
Location: So Cal
Watch: 16600 SD
Posts: 186
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.