ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 October 2012, 07:22 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: uk
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 725
|
Why no AR coating on Rolex
Why don't Rolex have AR coatings on their watches, I see Omega,Breitling and lots of other brands do it so why don't Rolex.
|
17 October 2012, 07:25 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
it wears off over time and i doubt it was ever a deal breaker for a purchaser. but the real answer is, nobody knows 100% why.
|
17 October 2012, 07:26 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Rolex themselves have said that they consider the prominent crystal to be a core part of their design, and that an AR coating would detract from this
|
17 October 2012, 07:27 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
There IS an AR coating on Rolex crystals with a cyclops these days... it's placed under the cyclops to get a better view of the date from an angle.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
17 October 2012, 07:29 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: YG DD lchdp
Posts: 2,963
|
any coating can scratch and may not have the properties of the synthetic crystal
|
17 October 2012, 07:33 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
|
17 October 2012, 07:38 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
|
|
17 October 2012, 07:41 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
I like being able to take reflected light off the bezel and shine it in peoples eyes. Cannot be done with AR coating.
cheers:
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
17 October 2012, 07:54 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 781
|
I agree. For me it is pointless to buy a watch if you can not shine it in peoples eyes.
__________________
...And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years... |
17 October 2012, 07:57 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: texas
Posts: 245
|
FWIW, a 'how to remove AR coating' thread will pop up regularly over on the Omega forums.
|
17 October 2012, 08:41 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
As alluded to already, scratches are only an issue if the AR coating is applied to the outer surface of the crystal.
I for one, would love to see Rolex apply AR coating to the underside of the entire crystal. I certainly think cyclops that have it are easier to read and look better than those without it. |
17 October 2012, 08:52 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
|
Quote:
I have a watch with AR but it is key because the synthetic crystal is dome shaped. |
|
17 October 2012, 08:53 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
The Rolex crystal sure do look pretty.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
17 October 2012, 08:55 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
The problem with the double AR coating is the bluish tint that you get. I like my Rolexes the way they are.
|
17 October 2012, 08:57 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
|
17 October 2012, 09:08 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Quote:
Scratching the the AR coating is serious stuff and I found it very difficult but it eventually happened. My PO has scratches on the AR coating but they're imperceptible except when pointed out. After wearing the PO for so long and now having a SD, I've learned to appreciate the AR of my PO, it makes the dial and markers pop out at you and very beautiful to photograph the dial. While the lack of coating on the SD has never made it actually difficult to tell time, I can say that in certain lighting situations the watch face looks bland and dull, while in the same situations my PO looks so clear and focused. Since my wife has been wearing my PO lately I've had the chance to obsess and stare at them both while we're about and have made comparisons of everything that's visual. I do love the look my SD has in certain angles, it gleams and shines and looks very beautiful, so many reflections, the black oily dial, scalloped bezel and its edges, the hands/markers, etc. all compliment one another. The crystal shines and matches the rest of the watch to create a shimmer the PO cannot match, and I love it. One side effect of the lack of AR is that the SD shows every kind of mark or smudge from fingers and such, and a simple wipe just doesn't clean it. On the other hand, there's nothing like looking down at the dial of my PO and and seeing the crystal clear dial, invisible crystal, like I could touch the hands. The watch face looks like it's in sharp focus, nothing dull in any light. When you look at the dial you interact one on one with it, no crystal middle man. My wife is anti-wis but she also made this observation between the two. I just enjoy them both, and accept their qualities individually. Both awesome watches, the honeymoon with each is never over. This stuff about scratching the ar is baloney, I'm more concerned about scratching my SD's bracelet and case which seem like scratch magnets. I'm ocd about my stuff and the scratches to the ar on my PO are nearly unnoticeable except under scrutiny. The grass isn't always greener and since I like the way my SD looks, I'd have to say that before I'd say that Rolex should add AR, I'd first like to see a prototype, but it may be promising, maybe not. |
|
17 October 2012, 09:22 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
The DSSD needs the AR coating on that doomed crystal... Very distracting when viewing the time on it.
|
17 October 2012, 09:56 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
You are all thinking reactive; let's think proactive: dump sapphire and go back to acrylic.
Plastic for the win!
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
17 October 2012, 11:26 AM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
The AR technology isn't really up to my expectations. I want it integrated into the crystal and polarize as well.
As long as they are still using surface coatings (whether inner surface or outer surface) I think Rolex should stay away from it - just becomes another headache for owners.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.