The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 October 2012, 12:33 AM   #1
S52
"TRF" Member
 
S52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL230
Watch: me fly-by
Posts: 789
Close call! (crown unscrewed+ h2O)

So had a pretty scary close call a couple weeks ago.

I was down in Key west on a work trip, and had my trusty GMT on my wrist. My buddies were already in the pool so I grabbed a can of brew and jumped into about waist deep water... right as I was about to dunk the watch under I felt over the crown as a final safety check and wouldn't you know it the freaking crown was completely unscrewed!

Its a good thing I was only a couple of beers in otherwise Im certain that check would not have occurred!

It was ironic too because after the scare, my friends and even a couple strangers commented "hey you've still got your watch on, are you sure it wont get ruined?"

So lesson learned... any time theres even a chance of me being near water while wearing these watches, obligatory crown check will occur!

Anyone else have similar stories/ blunders to share?

__________________
GMT Master II 16710B BLRO--Sea Dweller 16600--Submariner 1680--Milgauss 116400--Tudor BB58 79030B--Omega Speedmaster Pro--IWC Mark XV Automatic--Breitling Aerospace
S52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 12:36 AM   #2
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
I once took a shower after setting the time but forgot to screw down the crown. No big deal.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 12:37 AM   #3
RolexDivers
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
Even with the crown unscrewed, the sub is good for 100ft water submersion.
As far as GMT, well maybe good for 50ft unscrewed?

BUT yes, water is water and it will find its way into your case so always have your crown screwed in, don't take any chances.
RolexDivers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 02:23 AM   #4
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexDivers View Post
Even with the crown unscrewed, the sub is good for 100ft water submersion.
As far as GMT, well maybe good for 50ft unscrewed?

BUT yes, water is water and it will find its way into your case so always have your crown screwed in, don't take any chances.

Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 02:26 AM   #5
Kingair
"TRF" Member
 
Kingair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexDivers View Post
Even with the crown unscrewed, the sub is good for 100ft water submersion.
As far as GMT, well maybe good for 50ft unscrewed?

BUT yes, water is water and it will find its way into your case so always have your crown screwed in, don't take any chances.
Great info . . . didn't know that

Thanks

HAGWe

Kingair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 03:10 AM   #6
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
I see your a fellow aviator. Preflight checks my friend
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 03:15 AM   #7
RolexDivers
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
and along the same lines, I think the DSSD, with its crown unscrewed,
is 1000ft water resistant ---- can you believe that? It is amazing to know that at its most vulnrerable point, the DSSD acts like a SUB at its strongest ....
RolexDivers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 04:02 AM   #8
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
The trip lock crowns are just as waterproof open as they are closed. The issues people have are almost always due to not servicing the watch and the o-rings don't seal like they are supposed to.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 04:18 PM   #9
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
Too much misinformation IMO.

A correctly functioning (read serviced and pressure tested) Rolex crown is waterproof to its rated depth with the crown unscrewed.
In the case of the triplock that is 500 bar (multilply that by 14.8 psi)
The screw down function is to prevent you from using the crown at depth.

The Daytona pushers have a screw down function which is also there to prevent them from being used at depth but notice that the Daytona screw down pushers don't have a 'crown' style seal as it is not needed.

S52 would only have had a problem if his crown stem or case back seals had been worn.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 04:22 PM   #10
versatile1
"TRF" Member
 
versatile1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Too much misinformation IMO.

A correctly functioning (read serviced and pressure tested) Rolex crown is waterproof to its rated depth with the crown unscrewed.
In the case of the triplock that is 500 bar (multlply that by 14.8 psi)
The screw down function is to prevent you from using the crown at depth.

The Daytona pushers have a screw down function which is also there to prevent them from being used at depth but notice that the Daytona screw down pushers don't have a 'crown' style seal as it is not needed.

S52 would only have had a problem if his crown stem or case back seals had been worn.
Oh.
versatile1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 04:59 PM   #11
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
My
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 05:29 PM   #12
Watchmutt
"TRF" Member
 
Watchmutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 724
word
Watchmutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 05:52 PM   #13
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I once took a shower after setting the time but forgot to screw down the crown. No big deal.
Likewise I was once 30m underwater and I noticed my crown was unscrewed on my SD,but did not panic as it was insured.On return to surface after our planned dive watch was fine and still fine today after hundreds of hours underwater in salt and freshwater.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 08:57 PM   #14
James M
"TRF" Member
 
James M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 16610
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Too much misinformation IMO.

A correctly functioning (read serviced and pressure tested) Rolex crown is waterproof to its rated depth with the crown unscrewed.
In the case of the triplock that is 500 bar (multilply that by 14.8 psi)
The screw down function is to prevent you from using the crown at depth.

The Daytona pushers have a screw down function which is also there to prevent them from being used at depth but notice that the Daytona screw down pushers don't have a 'crown' style seal as it is not needed.

S52 would only have had a problem if his crown stem or case back seals had been worn.

I never knew this
James M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 09:16 PM   #15
Brushpup
"TRF" Member
 
Brushpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Likewise I was once 30m underwater and I noticed my crown was unscrewed on my SD,but did not panic as it was insured.On return to surface after our planned dive watch was fine and still fine today after hundreds of hours underwater in salt and freshwater.
Now we have someone openly admitting they subjected their SD to the harsh and rigorous conditions of taking it 90 ft down? In Salt water no less!

What is this place coming too?
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member


PClub # 10
74,592
The safest place for your watch is on your wrist.
Brushpup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 09:45 PM   #16
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brushpup View Post
Now we have someone openly admitting they subjected their SD to the harsh and rigorous conditions of taking it 90 ft down? In Salt water no less!

What is this place coming too?
Well it was pure accident I remember setting the time and giving it a wind then my group come up on deck so just put watch down by my gear.After planning the dive with my group just put watch back on wrist after kitting up and doing a buddy check then all in the water.I was busy just watching and checking my group while going down making sure they were all OK.But when we reached out planned depth just checked watch and computer and noticed crown was unscrewed.But my priorities were my group and not the watch as watches can be replaced lives cannot.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2012, 10:05 PM   #17
Brushpup
"TRF" Member
 
Brushpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
Peter, I was just being sarcastic about someone actually diving with a SD.

Sorry my humour and sarcasm didn't come through.
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member


PClub # 10
74,592
The safest place for your watch is on your wrist.
Brushpup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 01:09 AM   #18
S52
"TRF" Member
 
S52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL230
Watch: me fly-by
Posts: 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Too much misinformation IMO.

A correctly functioning (read serviced and pressure tested) Rolex crown is waterproof to its rated depth with the crown unscrewed.
In the case of the triplock that is 500 bar (multilply that by 14.8 psi)
The screw down function is to prevent you from using the crown at depth.

The Daytona pushers have a screw down function which is also there to prevent them from being used at depth but notice that the Daytona screw down pushers don't have a 'crown' style seal as it is not needed.

S52 would only have had a problem if his crown stem or case back seals had been worn.
Interesting, thanks for the info did not know this!

Even so, still feel much more comfortable with it screwed down if getting wet!
__________________
GMT Master II 16710B BLRO--Sea Dweller 16600--Submariner 1680--Milgauss 116400--Tudor BB58 79030B--Omega Speedmaster Pro--IWC Mark XV Automatic--Breitling Aerospace
S52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 04:54 AM   #19
knuss
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 130
I've almost made this mistake several times.
knuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 07:15 AM   #20
GeoGio Greece
"TRF" Member
 
GeoGio Greece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Too much misinformation IMO.

.........In the case of the triplock that is 500 bar (multilply that by 14.8 psi)
The screw down function is to prevent you from using the crown at depth.


S52 would only have had a problem if his crown stem or case back seals had been worn.
500 bar is 5000 m in depth , (1 bar = 10,33 m of water )

The triplock has three seal areas, the second, being the one on the inside of the crown, the no 3 of the cut section , "seats" only when screwed down.

So, concluding, I am of the opinion, that the inside seal, ( Nos 1 & 2 ) on the crown axis and possibly theone ( No 4 ), of the trip lock, on the end of the "male" threads - neck, can hold some liquid-water penetration, when open, but srewing down is the "procedure" that secures the watch, as the latter, due to the tappered shape in the inside of the crown, "seats" the o-ring to seal and the crown seats the seal inside it.

There is a slide somewhere showing all these seals in a cut section, but could not find it now in my files. ( I did !!! )

I once just got my Sub wet while unscrewed with no damage, but some friends, with AK and DJ ( twinlock models ) had them open when showering or at sea and were floaded with water.



__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones.

DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series

Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series
GeoGio Greece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2012, 12:20 PM   #21
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Cool pics!
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2012, 01:25 AM   #22
gregdolley
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Greg Dolley
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rose Gold Daytona
Posts: 1,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Too much misinformation IMO.

A correctly functioning (read serviced and pressure tested) Rolex crown is waterproof to its rated depth with the crown unscrewed.
In the case of the triplock that is 500 bar (multilply that by 14.8 psi)
The screw down function is to prevent you from using the crown at depth.

The Daytona pushers have a screw down function which is also there to prevent them from being used at depth but notice that the Daytona screw down pushers don't have a 'crown' style seal as it is not needed.

S52 would only have had a problem if his crown stem or case back seals had been worn.
Good info!
gregdolley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2012, 04:13 AM   #23
sub-eddie
"TRF" Member
 
sub-eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Dr. Eddie
Location: Texas
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Likewise I was once 30m underwater and I noticed my crown was unscrewed on my SD,but did not panic as it was insured.On return to surface after our planned dive watch was fine and still fine today after hundreds of hours underwater in salt and freshwater.
Does insurance cover water damage? I have jewelers mutual but don't know exactly if they would cover that. I've always been curious to know if they do and I once asked them but I didn't get a straight answer.
sub-eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2012, 04:19 AM   #24
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoGio Greece View Post
500 bar is 5000 m in depth , (1 bar = 10,33 m of water )

The triplock has three seal areas, the second, being the one on the inside of the crown, the no 3 of the cut section , "seats" only when screwed down.

So, concluding, I am of the opinion, that the inside seal, ( Nos 1 & 2 ) on the crown axis and possibly theone ( No 4 ), of the trip lock, on the end of the "male" threads - neck, can hold some liquid-water penetration, when open, but srewing down is the "procedure" that secures the watch, as the latter, due to the tappered shape in the inside of the crown, "seats" the o-ring to seal and the crown seats the seal inside it.

There is a slide somewhere showing all these seals in a cut section, but could not find it now in my files. ( I did !!! )

I once just got my Sub wet while unscrewed with no damage, but some friends, with AK and DJ ( twinlock models ) had them open when showering or at sea and were floaded with water.



Nice cross sectional. Is it me, or is there a "top crust" to the crown?
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2012, 07:54 AM   #25
Tri-Tip
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-Tip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CA, USA
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 6,474
So, say you are 100 feet down and notice that the crown on your Sub is unscrewed. Do you leave it unscrewed until your surface, or screw it down? Could screwing it in while submerged force water into the watch?
Tri-Tip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2012, 07:58 AM   #26
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Wouldn't want to "plunger" any saltwater into the watch...
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2012, 07:03 PM   #27
GeoGio Greece
"TRF" Member
 
GeoGio Greece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
Nice cross sectional. Is it me, or is there a "top crust" to the crown?
This is supposed to be a "real" crown assembly cut off.

Because the crown "construction" metal is steel, ( for technical reasons ), while the appearence must have been gold in this example, the cutting off "twisted" the over layed gold metal sheet, just slightly detaching it from the steel base in this specific point to form this "crust".

If you have an experienced and trained eye ( like mine , being an enginner and having worked for years with metal constructions, cut off sections, x-rays on pieces, ultra sounds, destructive and non destructive proofing methods, etc ), you can clearly see the tubular construction of the main shaft, how the tappered assembly of this tube mates with the crown, the different metal / construction of the neck, the threads on the neck and crown and how they develop and fit, the "crust" continuation all over the crown, the "O" - rings seats, the lathe patterns, etc.

I once "fished" this picture from somewhere on the net, I do not even remember where and when, and kept it. Its good that I did !!
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones.

DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series

Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series
GeoGio Greece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2012, 08:13 PM   #28
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by sub-eddie View Post
Does insurance cover water damage? I have jewelers mutual but don't know exactly if they would cover that. I've always been curious to know if they do and I once asked them but I didn't get a straight answer.
At the time it was all insured with my all risks dive insurance including myself camera equipment, diving equipment, and watches all for unexplained loss or water damage.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2012, 12:18 AM   #29
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoGio Greece View Post
This is supposed to be a "real" crown assembly cut off.

Because the crown "construction" metal is steel, ( for technical reasons ), while the appearence must have been gold in this example, the cutting off "twisted" the over layed gold metal sheet, just slightly detaching it from the steel base in this specific point to form this "crust".

If you have an experienced and trained eye ( like mine , being an enginner and having worked for years with metal constructions, cut off sections, x-rays on pieces, ultra sounds, destructive and non destructive proofing methods, etc ), you can clearly see the tubular construction of the main shaft, how the tappered assembly of this tube mates with the crown, the different metal / construction of the neck, the threads on the neck and crown and how they develop and fit, the "crust" continuation all over the crown, the "O" - rings seats, the lathe patterns, etc.

I once "fished" this picture from somewhere on the net, I do not even remember where and when, and kept it. Its good that I did !!
Ok so I haven't used proper engineering terms. And I laugh a lot. I agree, cool pic.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2012, 12:33 AM   #30
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
About three years ago, a good friend of mine jumped in his pool with the crown unscrewed on his GMT II. He never noticed it until after the fact and was in the pool for some time. Later he noticed the crown's position and eventually the watch started fogging. He had the watched checked and it did have water inside. He brought the watch to an AD and had it checked and the watch was sent to the RSC in NYC for repair. It cost him $2500 to have it repaired. He also told me that his home owners insurance paid for most of the repair.

The inner o-ring in the tube will wear with time and lose is ability to have a proper, water tight seal. Every since this incident with my friend's watch, I always check my crown before exposure to water.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.