ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 October 2012, 12:29 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 411
|
BPH seem low with AP
Please smack me senseless when I ask this.... This is just a total newbie question...
I see a lot of watches showing higher BPH like 36000 by zenith and many other watches touting 28000. The APs are down in the 21000 from what I have seen... Why are they so slow? While I would agree that faster doesnt always make it better it seems to be a modern standard and that AP is behind in terms of the general market. Can someone enlighten me on this? The more technical explanation the better for my nerdy self... |
25 October 2012, 09:10 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
I think Rolex choose 28K BPM, Omega 21K. I have no idea what Patek have. Not sure it makes much if any difference in timekeeping.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
25 October 2012, 10:53 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
Here's a good article on the topic. http://people.timezone.com/library/c...omarticles0017
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
26 October 2012, 12:45 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 229
|
If you don't want to read the whole thing;
It's harder to make a low-beat be precise then it is to make a high-beat be precise. So an accurate, slowbeating watch is kind of cooler then a highbeat one. Kind of. I kind of prefer the smoothness of a highbeat myself, but it's not really a problem either way. |
26 October 2012, 02:10 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
|
|
28 October 2012, 06:17 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 411
|
That timezone article is pretty good. From reading a few articles I the past days I seem to understand a bit more the challenges. It seems like the industry is at a new point where it is looking now at some advanced polymers and moving away with traditional metals... One article I found had to do with the new AP escapement and they lowered the speed to deal with friction and nonlubricated design which the new escapement is supposed to handle over a long period of time.
Is moving to polymers a good or bad thing in most peoples opinions? |
28 October 2012, 08:00 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Quote:
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.