ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 December 2012, 03:27 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,038
|
SubC running fast after only 40 minutes
Quick question everyone. The question is basically the thread title. At any rate I keep three of my four in constant rotation and when not wearing one of the three it stays on a winder. My other one is kept in a drawer of the winder for safe keeping and to keep as close to mint as possible. The three are my 214270, 216570, and the 114060. The SubC is the one Im referring to. I havent worn it it probably 6 days but its been on the winder. So today I pull it out to give a few manual winds even though its on the winder as Ive read its good to wind your Rolex every week or so even if its worn everyday. Granted I havent been but Im sure the winder takes the place of my wearing it everyday. So on to the question. I set it today per time.gov at 11 35 am to the second and now at 12 24 pm it is already 10 seconds fast. Any cause to be alarmed? The watch is maybe 2 months old and is a Random Serial 114060. Sorry guys for dragging out such a long post for a simple question.....
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask |
18 December 2012, 03:30 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
Is this the first time you timed it? Sounds odd to be 10 sec off that quickly..
__________________
Russ |
18 December 2012, 03:37 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,038
|
Nope Ive timed it before over the last few months and always something with COSC standards. Mainly always running a little fast but NEVER this fast. Im wondering if the manual winding had something to do with it because as I stated I only did a few manual turns because when I was doing it I could tell the main spring was a little tight already. I did maybe 6-9 turns. I Probably shouldve done NONE being it was on a winder 24/7 for 6-7 days. Should I let it wind down and keep that winding station off and try again in a few days??
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask |
18 December 2012, 03:40 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 108
|
Your time interval is much too small. COSC standards are an average over a much longer time
|
18 December 2012, 03:40 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
It sounds magnetized. That's about the typical rate of acceleration for a magnetized movement.
|
18 December 2012, 03:44 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,038
|
Your so right! I forgot all about that. I tell you what, out of all 4 of my watches the 214270 G Serial is the most accurate. That one is deadly accurate. Then the 216570 and lastly the 114060. My other one I couldnt say because I havent worn it in over 6 months but if I remember correctly it was also a little fast.
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask |
18 December 2012, 03:47 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,038
|
Okay. Who can demagnetize it. Would I have to send it to RSC or can my A D do it? Is it pretty simple to do and how long?
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask |
18 December 2012, 04:02 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
Your AD or an indie certified watchmaker is an option...
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
18 December 2012, 04:11 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,038
|
Guys thank you so much for your concerns but I think Gator08 nailed it. I have time.gov still open as one of my many pages at work and now I swear to you its now ONLY about 4 SECONDS fast. Wow! How stupid do I feel now. I actually watched 2 mins go by comparing the SubC to the website to make sure I wasnt wrong and Im not. Im guessing over the next 12 hours it might even get better. Thanks again Gator08 and everyone. Have a great day. Now its time to leave the office a do some Christmas shopping....
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask |
18 December 2012, 04:13 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Well if you believe the Rolex marketing getting a magnetised hairspring thats near impossible with the parachrom hairspring and would most seriously doubt if his watch is magnetised in any way.And IMHO to the original poster I would say its a error on your part.And a winder will not fully wind a watch and always fully manual wind around 40 full crown turns clockwise before putting on a winder.A winder will just keep the watch running myself just cannot see any point in winders on any watch especially one with just a date.And to test any watch for accuracy it must be done over at least 5 days.First fully wind watch 40 full crown turns clockwise only.Then sync your watch with a reliable time source for this test any quartz watch will do.Once you have sync time wear you watch as normal but for 8 hours plus a day.Check time daily with same setting source over 5 complete days and nights then average the loss or gain over those 5 days for a accurate result.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
18 December 2012, 04:37 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
Quote:
To answer: no, I don't believe marketers/marketing. I like good old fashioned science myself. I had a watch that was apparently exposed to some errant flux and was running 10-12 seconds fast per 12 hour period that I had demag'd. That said, this situation (provided his information was accurate, which it was not) seemed similar if not identical. |
|
18 December 2012, 06:23 AM | #12 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,038
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask |
|
18 December 2012, 09:46 AM | #13 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
Why don't you take a read, this is pretty good info. http://people.timezone.com/library/extras/200708222443 |
|
18 December 2012, 11:03 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
|
18 December 2012, 10:55 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: KL
Posts: 36
|
Make sure you have healthy connection to the internet to be consistent and use this:
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/simpletime.html It's fast loading, I quite sure it's pretty accurate. Hope this helps. |
18 December 2012, 11:02 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
18 December 2012, 11:17 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Quote:
While in the Rolex marketing video it states the Parachrom is 10 time more shockproof, but what they don't state is to what.Most cetainly not the Nivarox ones that they and most of the watch industry have used for the past 40 odd years.And with magnetic test where they hold a powerful magnet over a open case on a watch.So if you don't wear your watch dial down with the case back off with a powerful magnet near any hairspring.Then I would doubt in the real world that it would make little or no difference whatever the name of hairspring in the case. Today they sometimes quote watch is magnetiesd but in most cases all the watch needs is simple regulation.And if and its a big if any watches hairspring or other part gets magnetised its very very simple to De-magnetise. Now Nivarox thats the name of the alloy much like Rolex calls there Parachrom.Today it is used mainly in the watch/clock industry, but also in other micro-machine industries and in certain types of medical equipment and high presicion surgical instruments. There are several variations of the Nivarox alloy depending upon the intended application. These alloys are stainless steel alloys with high concentrations of Cobalt (42-48%), Nickel (15-25%) and Chromium (16-22%). There are also small amounts of titanium and beryllium. Hairsprings made of this alloy are highly wear-resistant,and they are practically non-magnetic in normal wearing,and non-rusting and possess a low coefficient of thermal expansion. Nivarox 1 through 5 is a series of grades of hairsprings with number 1 being the best quality. The most commonly encountered Nivarox hairsprings in the watch industry are grades 1 to 3. The alloy is unaffected by heat and normal every day ordinary magnetic fields. There is however, also the Anachron hairspring which is said to be of even higher quality than the Nivarox No 1 grade.Who knows perhaps that the grade that Rolex used over the past 40 odd years. Fact research specs from Nivarox Far.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
19 December 2012, 12:51 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
Stating your watch was running 10 seconds fast after 40 minutes. Watches don't speed up and slow down drastically without mechanical issues.
No, it was a Grand Seiko....8L35 Quote:
Respectfully, as much as I love the Rolex brand, the parachrom hairspring is made of metal and therefore is subject to magnetism. Remember, other parts in a watch movement can have magnetism introduced into individual components thus creating erratic timekeeping. |
|
19 December 2012, 02:16 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
|
In normal day to day life where are people experiencing magnetic fields powerful enough to magnetise watches?
|
24 December 2012, 12:05 AM | #20 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Jan
Location: PA
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 1,110
|
|
24 December 2012, 12:07 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Seriously neither of those are even remotely in the ballpark
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.