ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 February 2013, 10:29 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: SE Fla, Munich
Posts: 45
|
6605: fake, real or pieced together?
I am looking at this watch tomorrow http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mens-ROLEX-6...item29fa819209 from ebay; the seller happens to be in the same town where I live.
(Rotated the first listing pic 90° to see the hands better; more pix online) What strikes me as odd: a) the hands – it looks as if the hour and the minute hand do not match, the latter resembling a mangled Dauphine if I'm correct b) a gold dial with a white date wheel? c) no TswissT ? d) the sn is listed as 345632 - I have a list of s/n from 1946 to 1987 (forget to note source; durn), and according to that there are no six-digit s/n's except in 1957 and 1958, which started with 6... and 8... S/n's starting with 3... were used 1971 through 1973, but this watch should be from the 50s or 60s if I'm not mistaken. As I'm writing this post I'm getting more and more suspicious. What is your opinion? |
1 February 2013, 10:44 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DB
Location: :noitacoL
Watch: :hctaW
Posts: 6,703
|
Serial number is in the right range for a 6605 ( there is a good serial number chart in the TRF reference section). Dial is refinished, although markers appear correct. Hands have been replaced. I'd wonder what else may have been altered.
On the plus side..... IMO the price is too high. Oh wait, that's not a plus.
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. |
1 February 2013, 12:39 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
to expensive, the lugs and bezel are way overpolished and the shape is compromised imho there are better examples, the watch should have dauphine or alpha hands, the dial is refinished, but at least the single and double arrow head or some call them dart markers remain.
__________________
watches many |
4 February 2013, 04:15 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
|
..ditto.
|
5 February 2013, 06:19 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Air-King 5500
Posts: 2,620
|
The dial has definatly suffered from a poor refinish.
|
5 February 2013, 09:02 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Quote:
HAGOne |
|
5 February 2013, 09:07 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: SE Fla, Munich
Posts: 45
|
Yup, and what about the non-matching hands?
Btw, I didn't go see the watch; waste of time. |
5 February 2013, 09:59 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Not sure about the date wheel.
|
20 February 2013, 12:08 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: vince
Location: niagara falls ny
Watch: tt blue face sub,
Posts: 58
|
the letter m is off looooook
|
20 February 2013, 12:14 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,872
|
$4K for this? $14,700 dollar replacement value? This guy is smoking rope!
__________________
|
20 February 2013, 12:51 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
|
The current Rolex Datejust model in solid 18K on a gold/lether strap retails for $18K or so. I was offered a brand new white gold model for $13,600 by an AD in the virgin islands and I seriously considered it. So, as far as 'replacement' cost, he's not too far away, assuming replacing with a current model. Also, I agree that $4k is too much for this watch, but around $3k would be reasonable.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.