ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

fitter_happier · 19 February 2013, 05:48 AM

Can someone tell me the first year of the 16613? Was the 16803 the transitional model?

It has been a while since I owned a sub, and I'm rusty. Not to mention my subs were always all steel, never a TT. I have a 16613 on hold and am anxious to learn more about it.

I never understood the TT sub until I overhauled one for a friend a few months back. Afterwards I had to have one.

His was a no-holes SEL. Mine will have holes and non-SEL.

Alpino · 19 February 2013, 06:21 AM

.

16610 and 16613 1st appearance is Q1 1989.

Lug holes up to 2003, and SEL introduction with new band 93250/93253 in 2000.

fitter_happier · 19 February 2013, 09:00 AM

Thanks, that is helpful. Was there any overlap in the models?

Was there ever a 16613 that used the 3035 movement with open 6 and 9 date?

Alpino · 19 February 2013, 09:13 AM

.

No 3035 for 16613. 16610/13/18 were there to introduce the 3135.

. Dial :
89 to 98 : SWISS-T< 25
98 to 99 : SWISS
00 To 10 : SWISS MADE

. laser etched coronet in 99

. with the end of lug holes 16613 become 16613T in 2003

. engraved rehaut in 07

fitter_happier · 19 February 2013, 10:05 AM

Wow, incredible knowledge. Thank you!

It seems the 16803 is somewhat rare. Is it worth more money than an early 16613?

fitter_happier · 20 February 2013, 07:24 AM

info deleted

ROGERWILCO357 · 25 February 2013, 10:31 PM

what is the difference between the 16610 and 16613 ?

fitter_happier · 26 February 2013, 01:18 AM

16610 = all steel sub
16613 = steel and gold sub

ROGERWILCO357 · 26 February 2013, 06:46 AM

ah two tone got it..

19 February 2013, 05:48 AM	#1
fitter_happier "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: there, there Posts: 105	First year of 16613? Can someone tell me the first year of the 16613? Was the 16803 the transitional model? It has been a while since I owned a sub, and I'm rusty. Not to mention my subs were always all steel, never a TT. I have a 16613 on hold and am anxious to learn more about it. I never understood the TT sub until I overhauled one for a friend a few months back. Afterwards I had to have one. His was a no-holes SEL. Mine will have holes and non-SEL.

20 February 2013, 07:24 AM	#6
fitter_happier "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: there, there Posts: 105	info deleted Last edited by fitter_happier; 20 February 2013 at 07:25 AM.. Reason: wrong thread

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

19 February 2013, 06:21 AM	#2
Alpino "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Paris Posts: 2,556	. 16610 and 16613 1st appearance is Q1 1989. Lug holes up to 2003, and SEL introduction with new band 93250/93253 in 2000.

19 February 2013, 09:00 AM	#3
fitter_happier "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: there, there Posts: 105	Thanks, that is helpful. Was there any overlap in the models? Was there ever a 16613 that used the 3035 movement with open 6 and 9 date?

19 February 2013, 09:13 AM	#4
Alpino "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Paris Posts: 2,556	. No 3035 for 16613. 16610/13/18 were there to introduce the 3135. . Dial : 89 to 98 : SWISS-T< 25 98 to 99 : SWISS 00 To 10 : SWISS MADE . laser etched coronet in 99 . with the end of lug holes 16613 become 16613T in 2003 . engraved rehaut in 07

19 February 2013, 10:05 AM	#5
fitter_happier "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: there, there Posts: 105	Wow, incredible knowledge. Thank you! It seems the 16803 is somewhat rare. Is it worth more money than an early 16613?

25 February 2013, 10:31 PM	#7
ROGERWILCO357 Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Michigan Watch: Submariner LV Posts: 580	what is the difference between the 16610 and 16613 ?

26 February 2013, 01:18 AM	#8
fitter_happier "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: there, there Posts: 105	16610 = all steel sub 16613 = steel and gold sub

26 February 2013, 06:46 AM	#9
ROGERWILCO357 Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Michigan Watch: Submariner LV Posts: 580	ah two tone got it..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)