ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gatt · 9 March 2013, 08:33 PM

http://www.ebay.it/itm/ROLEX-SUBMARI...item23282717c7

Should it have a 9315 bracelet? I cant judge if it has pointed crown guards as well.
Thanks for any help.

Mark020 · 9 March 2013, 11:51 PM

Serial is 2.3 so no 1960 but later. And no PCG as well.

violetman · 10 March 2013, 12:00 AM

not pointed crown guards , not gilt dial as well

springer · 10 March 2013, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gatt

http://www.ebay.it/itm/ROLEX-SUBMARI...item23282717c7

Should it have a 9315 bracelet? I cant judge if it has pointed crown guards as well.
Thanks for any help.

The 9315 bracelet would be an appropriate bracelet for a late 1960's Submariner. The 93150 bracelet was released during the mid-1970's which would not be original for this watch. From my experience, you will see many early Subs wearing the 93150 bracelet. It does not seem to be a major issue with collectors due to the value of both bracelets being relatively the same if in average to above average condition - although a period correct 9315 bracelet in excellent condition for a specific Submariner will usually be a couple hundred dollars more than a comparable 93150 bracelet.

MichaelB_Can · 10 March 2013, 01:57 AM

My 5513 is 2.4 million and it's a 1969 if that helps .

Mike B , Canada ⌚

MichaelB_Can · 10 March 2013, 01:59 AM

He has it listed as a 1969 now not 1960 . Did it get changed ? They didn't have pointed crown guards then . It was one of the first ft first dials.

Mike B , Canada ⌚

turpe · 10 March 2013, 02:38 AM

Maybe the original listing said 'Late 60' when he meant 'Late 60s'?

MichaelB_Can · 10 March 2013, 03:01 AM

I don't know but in 69 no pointed guards ft first started and guilt dials where long done. Here is a picture of mine . All correct .

you be the judge .

Mike B , Canada ⌚

Gatt · 10 March 2013, 04:51 AM

My fault: I wrote late '60 instead of late 60s. Yes, it is listed as 1969.

The seller confirmed, with some roughness of manners, the wrong bracelet type.

MichaelB_Can · 10 March 2013, 04:57 AM

It should be a folded link bracelet 9315 with 280 endlinks I believe , if you get it I'm sure you could sell the bracelet and get a 9315 or maybe trade for 1. I personally don't think it's that big of a deal . You see so many now with no bracelet on a nato for sale .
But that bezel dot is so white it would drive me crazy . I'd try to find an older one. But that's just me .

Mike B , Canada ⌚

9 March 2013, 08:33 PM	#1
Gatt "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Italy Posts: 5	Is this a real late '60 5513? http://www.ebay.it/itm/ROLEX-SUBMARI...item23282717c7 Should it have a 9315 bracelet? I cant judge if it has pointed crown guards as well. Thanks for any help.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

9 March 2013, 11:51 PM	#2
Mark020 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 2,133	Serial is 2.3 so no 1960 but later. And no PCG as well.

10 March 2013, 12:00 AM	#3
violetman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: HK Posts: 96	not pointed crown guards , not gilt dial as well

10 March 2013, 01:57 AM	#5
MichaelB_Can Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 332	My 5513 is 2.4 million and it's a 1969 if that helps . Mike B , Canada ⌚

10 March 2013, 01:59 AM	#6
MichaelB_Can Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 332	He has it listed as a 1969 now not 1960 . Did it get changed ? They didn't have pointed crown guards then . It was one of the first ft first dials. Mike B , Canada ⌚

10 March 2013, 02:38 AM	#7
turpe "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: California Watch: JLC MasterCalendar Posts: 113	Maybe the original listing said 'Late 60' when he meant 'Late 60s'?

10 March 2013, 03:01 AM	#8
MichaelB_Can Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 332	I don't know but in 69 no pointed guards ft first started and guilt dials where long done. Here is a picture of mine . All correct . you be the judge . Mike B , Canada ⌚

10 March 2013, 04:51 AM	#9
Gatt "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Italy Posts: 5	My fault: I wrote late '60 instead of late 60s. Yes, it is listed as 1969. The seller confirmed, with some roughness of manners, the wrong bracelet type.

10 March 2013, 04:57 AM	#10
MichaelB_Can Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 332	It should be a folded link bracelet 9315 with 280 endlinks I believe , if you get it I'm sure you could sell the bracelet and get a 9315 or maybe trade for 1. I personally don't think it's that big of a deal . You see so many now with no bracelet on a nato for sale . But that bezel dot is so white it would drive me crazy . I'd try to find an older one. But that's just me . Mike B , Canada ⌚

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)