ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 November 2013, 04:49 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
|
my thoughts on my sub-c clasp
When I first bought my submariner about half a year ago, I noticed how long the clasp was, say compared to the GMT-IIC, Explorer and Daytona.
Well, it's been 6 months into it and whenever I have my sub on my wrist and turn it over to look at the crown, I feel like the clasp size is just perfect. I actually like how the large clasp is able to cover about 80% of the bottom of my wrist and I feel it looks really classy without showing its links. This is just a personal view and is not intended in insulting anyone who owns either of the above watches, which I think are gorgeous. Does anybody share my point of view on how perfect the size of the clasp is? When I look at the Exp II 216570, I feel the clasp is actually quite small. |
5 November 2013, 05:22 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
It's all relative but I do like the easy glide clasp. Wish I could find an 18k YG one.
|
5 November 2013, 05:33 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
|
Yup, at first I thought the clasp was a bit long on the SubC and would definitely be a scratch magnet but 2 months down to wearing the SubC, I do believe the long clasp is just right for my 6.5 inch wrist and I just have 1 tiny hairline scratch so far. So it's all good.
No experience yet on the 42mm Expy and new GMT2c so I can't comment on their clasp. |
5 November 2013, 07:16 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
|
yup, the clasp is a winner. and, for me, the little nicks and scratches it easily picks up add to my enjoyment of the watch.
|
5 November 2013, 07:37 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
I prefer the bigger clasp as well.
I wish it was on all models in the pro line. |
5 November 2013, 07:55 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
I'm not bothered by the scratches on my Glidelock clasp, but I actually think the overall look would be better if the clasp was shorter and more of the bracelet was exposed.
I know this would reduce the functionality of the clasp, but I don't need the full range of adjustment it currently offers. (Yes, I wear a Submariner but I don't dive.... ) |
6 November 2013, 12:43 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
I like the old clasp better it looks and feels part of the bracelet. the clasp on the DS is one half of the band. To big and bulky for me.
|
6 November 2013, 12:47 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
Love the features of the newer clasp, wish it could have been engineered tad shorter though.
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
6 November 2013, 12:56 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: WatchULookinAt
Location: US
Posts: 564
|
I like it a lot, the precision manufacturing and engineering of it is fantastic!
|
6 November 2013, 01:17 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Best bracelet-clasp ever made IMHO.
|
6 November 2013, 10:13 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Glidelock aficionado here
It's a pity that Rolex don't offer it as an option for all the sporty models
__________________
|
6 November 2013, 10:39 AM | #12 |
Server Advisor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: LA & NY
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,118
|
|
6 November 2013, 11:58 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 453
|
Hadn't given the size much thought; too impressed with how well it works.
|
6 November 2013, 01:46 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 82
|
I agree !
|
6 November 2013, 02:08 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Clarita CA
Posts: 1,028
|
Couldn't agree more. I love every single thing about my Sub C. EVERYTHING!!!
|
6 November 2013, 03:19 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Singapore
Watch: Sky/Sea/Land
Posts: 681
|
somehow the glidelock is slightly more scratch resistant... |
6 November 2013, 04:28 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: sam
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Me Tint
Posts: 3,777
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.