1675 PCG case

[dstacy]

Any thoughts on this case? If its authentic it sure looks good for being 54 years old.
http://m.ebay.com/itm?itemId=121328156090

[AbsolutelyROLEX!]

looks good here

[crowncollection]

hmmm looks fake from here

[dbphotos]

Numbers too hard to read to make a good judgement.

[dstacy]

Originally Posted by crowncollection

hmmm looks fake from here

Just curious what do you see that makes you say that?

[crowncollection]

Originally Posted by dstacy

Just curious what do you see that makes you say that?

Engraving font is wrong easy to see, 1960's watch did not have that font on certain letter until later I cannot mast more otherwise fakers will fix it, like they fixed the long E's

[Goiguidoc]

Originally Posted by crowncollection

Engraving font is wrong easy to see, 1960's watch did not have that font on certain letter until later I cannot mast more otherwise fakers will fix it, like they fixed the long E's

X2

Totally agree. The font doesn't match the year the serial number.

[dstacy]

I'm pretty slow to openly pronounce something a fake and call someone a liar but I do find it amazing that a 54 year old case has ZERO corrosion on it.

[springer]

Originally Posted by crowncollection

Engraving font is wrong easy to see, 1960's watch did not have that font on certain letter until later I cannot mast more otherwise fakers will fix it, like they fixed the long E's

Besides the "incorrrect font for a certain letter," the watch appears freshly stamped - the stamping is too perfect! The early 1960s stampings never looked this good.